Change Your Image
primogose
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
El río y la muerte (1954)
Good, but not brilliant
This movie it's not the most personal job of Luis Buñuel, but it has its moments, and it's well told. I always wonder at Buñuel's mastery at storytelling; I mean, he seems very careless about the technical aspects of doing a film, like choosing the more distinguished framing, but always manages to tell us very clearly what's happening, even in his more surreal movies.
Said that, this particular film has, to me, a very weak part in the story of Doctor Gerardo and his mother. The Mexico D.F. scenes are too discursive, always leaning on the idea of the unavoidable character of human progress, that i think it's almost unbelievable nowadays. Also, I couldn't trust the change of Gerardo's mother point of view about revenge and honor when he arrives to the village. Not to mention the final reconciliation between Gerardo and Lorenzo, that, like some other user said, seems too sudden, or the way that Gerardo beats Lorenzo the night before.
I guess that Buñuel didn't have the same interest on this part of the history than on the central, western flavored flashback, that is the very spine of the film (It's a shame that Buñuel didn't directed a western movie). In his autobiography he said he didn't agree with the thesis of the movie: "let's all graduate, and we will stop killing ourselves". And i think he was right.
Calle Mayor (1956)
We are not helpless, Mr. Bardem
OK, I can understand why this movie had such an impact on some segments of 50's Spain; it was almost the first neo-realistic movie made on the country, and its attitude and principles were far away from the films that the Spanish industry made on the post-civil war years.
But it's very derivative of Rossellinni, and specially De Sica's movies of the 40's & 50's. It's just an attempt of doing what the European left-winged filmmakers of that period thought was right and meaningful: to denounce society's injustices.
I'm not against social concerned films, like the ones that directors above mentioned did, but sure i don't like to be preached from someone who thinks he's right and moral, and that's the way i felt seeing this film. Said that, i had to to confess i always have in mind the (very discursive) scene on which the old professor tells that boredom is just one of the biggest social problems, that leads people to do very cruel and insensitive things. Contradictory, but only in a way; just because i do agree with that idea i just can't justify that someone puts himself above someone else like the professor (obviously Bardem) do with the "not so young" gang of "good-for-nothing" men.
Finally i didn't like the despairing final; it seems like Betsy Blair's character has ceased to exist not taking the train to Madrid. Does that mean that leaving for a big city is going to settle provincial people problems? Why can't she take this like something that needs to reaffirm herself? I'd rather see a more open final.
Anyway, great Betsy Blair. It's a shame she didn't had the chances she deserved: "Marty" is my 50's favorite drama, and she is wonderful here too. Maybe she's not that ugly like some other user said, but when you see a film you always expect an incredible good-looking woman, and she was not, so to me she's believable on that kind of roles.