Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
The low budget and lack of originality keep this from being anything of value
1 December 2010
Being a fan of James Dean and his films I jumped at the chance to see this film. I was aware going in that it had a low budget and mostly unknown cast. But I thought the allure of Dean and the era of film making would be interesting enough to not require expensive sets or name actors. Long story short, I was wrong. Sometimes the most important part missing is a lack of capable direction.

Casper Van Dien does what he can with a badly written script. No set pieces are explored anything further than a two shot exchange. The scene where Van Dien playing 'Dean' meets with the leader of a local gang is an example. What could have been an interesting look at Dean's preparation for his role in Rebel Without A Cause becomes a clumsy exchange between the two actors. The dialogue feels awkward and unrehearsed.

All supporting actors bring nothing to their roles. Diane Ladd uses every Italian cliché she can think of. Carrie Mitchum as Pier Angeli is tolerable but forgettable. And sadly this is Robert Mitchum's final role playing Giant director George Stevens.

One thing that really annoyed me was the lack of accuracy regarding the clothing. Aside from looking at a distance like the 50's, up close it didn't hold up to closer viewing. Van Dien could have been playing any L.A. 20 something in dressed down clothes. His attire was just cheap, generic clothing cobbled together to look simple. Only "Rebel's" red windbreaker was replicated for the movie.

On a positive note Casper Van Dien did an excellent job replicating a now infamous Dean clip warning drivers about the dangers of speeding. It's possibly the best scene in the film. It was the first time I was able to literally sit up take notice of Van Dien's acting. I wonder what preparation he did for the role. And secondly the final scene is very well shot. I wouldn't be surprised if that's where a lot of the planning and budget went. It was well directed, acted and shot.

All in all though this film still only gets a 3.3/10. You're better off watching "James Dean" with James Franco. A far better telling of Dean's life and legacy.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wolf (1994)
9/10
Nice movie with that old feeling
6 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the first proper werewolf movies that I ever saw. Sure I saw some when I was a kid but they were sleazy 80's movies with nothing memorable about them other than they wore leather and listened bad to rock.

This movie has that old 50's mood. The big houses, The city scape, the lead female characters, Randal's job. The soundtrack even uses some jazz. And they never make it seem stupid by saying "Werewolf" instead they talk around the word.

*Warning: MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS* The FX by Rick Baker are done very well. The subtle use of application effects instead of masks makes Jack Nicholson look 20 years younger. Everything about this movie is smooth. The end fight scene has one or two dodge wire stunts and rubber pitch forks but thats cool.

The movie is definitely one of the better werewolf movies not just for its theme but its characters. If you want just a balls-out werewolf movie you might have to rent some of the more recent films like the shoddy 'Van Helsing'.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed