5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Fuller House (2016–2020)
1/10
racist
27 August 2021
This show is highly racist against whites and generally not as funny or amusing as the older series, though I'm not surprised given who the creator is.

I'd rather watch a Larry David show for funnies. At least he can spread the funny amongst everyone rather than using a singular race as the butt of un-funny "jokes"..
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Society (2019– )
1/10
Bad acting, writing, and blatant partisan politics.
17 June 2019
I thought the show's premise had potential, but the acting, writing and blatant partisan politics are all so bad that you might as well just watch something else. I wish companies would stop making everything about politics, or at the very least put some effort in to make it more neutral and less cheesy. This would probably have been at least watchable if they focused more on the scifi/mystery than the badly written drama.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shooter (2016–2018)
1/10
Show written by people who have never seen nor know anything about guns.
22 June 2018
In the first 5 minutes they try to look smart by spouting off ignorant, bull crap gun information of the likes you'd expect from a dishonest gun grabber like Hillary.

A 223 is not too small for a wolf; in fact it's even deer legal in many states. Terminal performance depends on bullet type, load, and range - most 223 ammo should be just fine for a wolf at 200 yards. At 100 yards a 223 hollow point bullet will leave a pretty huge hole, more than enough for a coyote!

I don't know about other people but I for one am tired of fake movie science written by people who know nothing about what they're talking about.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
MacGyver (2016–2021)
1/10
Fake science, fake hacking, bad acting.
24 October 2016
Why did they have to crap on my favorite childhood show? Also, I'm seriously tired of blatantly fake movie science. Which is the entire premise of this show.

You don't hack an encrypted computer by shutting it off, busting it, and pulling the drive. That's the #1 way to ensure you won't crack an encrypted drive in your lifetime (or several). Why didn't they do something believable that actually works in the real world like freezing the f***ing RAM of a powered on and already decrypted system and removing it to extract the key while the ram has remnant power? Oh right their budget is too low to do research and that's not cheesy enough.

The early twist was kinda dumb. Heck, all 4 episodes I watched were kinda dumb. It was cringeworthy, only children would like this show and I think even that is a stretch.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of money
7 December 2010
This game looks and plays like some resurrected 1990's dinosaur.

The game is composed entirely of low quality, heavily artifacted QuickTime videos, and of course, requires QT installed to play it. You can't set the resolution manually, so if you're using an LCD, you'll get even worse graphics from monitor/gpu scaling.

The data of the game is huge, large enough that if they had used a proper modern codec, it would look OK (but yet it still wouldn't be OK, due to the gameplay!). They should have either made a regular movie or 3d game, either way would have corrected most of the issues the game suffers.

It's also buggy.

If you need more detailed review - look around. Just don't fall for the high rating on IMDb like I did...
5 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed