Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Poor
31 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Porky's 2 was saddled with the unenviable task of following up The Most Successful Film In Canadain History(TM). It had the majority of the original cast and the same writer/director - what could possibly go wrong? Well, just about everything ...

The original Porky's helped to create the genre of the American high school sex-comedy - still a hugely popular and bankable theme today. Whilst the original creamed $111 million at the US box office, the sequel only scored a limp $33 million.

The problem with Porky's II is that it is supposed to be a sex-comedy, yet it has no sex and very little comedy. Whilst the original film had a pretty flimsy plot, at least it had one. The characters had clear motives, be it getting laid or taking revenge on Porky's. In the sequel the main motivation of the characters is to get a series of Shakespeare plays performed by their school drama group. Yes, that's right - they are no longer seeking out the pleasures of strip bars, peeping on the girls showers or trying to bed nubile cheerleaders - they want to perform a midsummer night's dream.

It's hard to come up with a more poorly conceived plot device for the Porky's series. It takes some suspension of disbelief to think that the likes of Pee Wee and Meat are going to do battle with folk of angel beach so they put on the works of the great bard.

The villains of this piece are also poorly realised. There is an extremely annoying hypocritical Reverend and a slimy politician. The role of Miss Balbricker is downplayed and Porky (the title character!) doesn't even appear in the film.

The "jokes" here are laboured, far outstaying their welcome. The best (worst?) example of this is the final scene in the restaurant where Wendy exacts revenge on the duplicitous politician. It is a scene so overdone, so overacted that it is painful to watch. To be this bad takes sausAGES.

Fans of the Porky film are not hard to please. Take some low brow comedy, add in copious amounts of gratuitous nudity and start counting in the cash. Remove these elements and you are left with a 90 minute waste of celluloid.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Under Siege (1992)
6/10
Underwhelming
30 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
A review of this film only really needs 5 words - "Die Hard on a boat", and no doubt this is how the producers of the film pitched it to the studio. Instead of the wisecracking Willis here we has the rather soporific Seagal.

The plot is the usual tosh (well, it's not like we are not expecting Shakespeare from the author of "Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle Of Death"). Terrorists - including an over the top Tommy Lee Jones and the ubiquitous Gary Busey (does he every play a good guy?) - take over a ship equipped with nukes. It's down to the ship's cook (Seagal) - conveniently an explosives expert - to save the day.

This is viewed by some as Seagal's masterpiece - perhaps a slight misuse of the word, but it seems like "Citizen Kane" compared to his more recent direct to video work.

Segall goes about dispatching his foes with a series of Heath Robinson-esquire explosive traps. A problem with Seagall's work is the lack of comedy - there is none of the cartoon violence of Jackie Chan or the smarmy comments of a Bond or a John McClane. Erika Eleniak tags along in full blubbing bimbo mode.

The high points of the movie come when Eleniak bursts out of a birthday cake bearing her fabulous breasts for the world (before inexplicably bursting into one of her blubbing fits).

Andrew Davis - the master of mediocre - directs with his usual competent but dull style. Admittedly this is notch above his "Chain Reaction" (also written by Lawton) but not as good as his "Fugitive" or "Perfect Murder".

Overall it's just Die Hard on a boat.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's wife Jim, but not as we know it ...
30 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The Stepford Wives is a film with a lot of unfulfilled potential. The plot revolves around strange goings on in the suburban area of Stepford. A new couple move into the area and the wife (Katherine Ross) soon realises something is afoot. It all seems to resolve around a secretive men's organisation.

There are a number of problem's with this film. Whilst the 70's was the classic area of paranoia films (think "The Parallax View", "All the president's men" etc), director Bryan Forbes fails to really convey the paranoia, tension and suspense needed. When compared to Polanski's "Rosemary's Baby" (another adaptation from an Ira Levin novel) it falls very flat indeed.

The screenplay is not particularly strong. I'd be interested to seen William Goldman's original script - apparently Forbes completely rewrote it.

The casting is all wrong too. According to the original novel (and Goldman's original screenplay) the wives themselves are supposed to playboy bunny types - the complete embodiment of the American ideal of a perfect woman. Nanette Newman may be a good actress, but centrefold material she is not. This somewhat destroys the husbands' motives. If you are going to make a replacement wife, you are going to make her as perfect as possible.

It was rumoured that De Palma was considered for the director's role - I think this would have been a far more interesting film with him at the helm.

Still, some of the concepts and themes are interesting - which in some ways makes it all the more disappointing that the final result is so flat.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scrooged (1988)
7/10
The Toast Of Christmas Pasts
30 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Richard Donner's "Scrooged" is feel good Christmas fable. A re-imagining of the Dickens classic, set in the caring and sharing 80s. The plot is simple - a hard hearted TV exec is shown the folly of his ways by a series ghosts. There are no twists or surprises - the outcome is obvious from the first five minutes, but that doesn't make it any less enjoyable.

The film is carried by a wonderful performance from Bill Murray - it's hard to imagine it working with anyone else in the lead role. There is a bit of bite to the comedy early one - particularly with the over the top trailer for "the night the reindeer died" - but this fades over the course of the film.

This is not a film for the cynical - it can be overly sentimental at times - but fans of 80s comedies and Murray should find a lot to enjoy here.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed