Change Your Image
bjhabal
Reviews
Two and a Half Men (2003)
Is it really that bad?
Let's Face it, it is not the same as it was with Charlie Sheen, but is it really that bad? This is not a one man show, and every character have contributed one way or another to create moments of enjoyment for us, it is not only Charlie absent that reduced the quality of the show!, for instance, where is "Rose" the funniest stalker that I ever seen? Beside we have seen Charlie recently in "Anger Management" is he the same Charlie that we used to love, and supposedly he continued in "Two & half men" would his role as a handsome, rich playboy would be accepted especially after the way he looks right now (aged several years, lost a lot of weight and only God knows if he still using). Come on guys I love Charlie too but that does not give me the right to insult the hard works of every person contributed to this show. The bottom line is, yes it is not the same, I love Charlie, I love every character in the show and it is still funny and better than many other comedy that is airing right now.less
Anger Management (2012)
Not what I was expecting
Though I love Charlie Sheen, this is not a one man show, and the supporting actors/actress are either not funny, or may be the writing was not up to their talent. From what I have seen in the first two episodes, this show has no future unless something dramatically changed. In Two and half men every character had its momentum, and the jokes came out naturally unlike in anger management, where they force the joke on you though it is not really a funny one.On the other hand, I don't understand why the show runner insisting in repeating the role of Charlie as a sex addicted playboy, played in Two and a half men, which already have exhausted during the nine seasons run of the show, although he is capable of doing much better than that. The bottom line, I gave the show 5 point for Charlie Sheen overcoming his problems and returning to the T.V. screen, and not for the show itself.