Reviews

10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Human Zoo (2009)
9/10
My best Berlinale '09 film
20 February 2009
Not for the faint at heart, Human Zoo takes up the sociopathy of betrayal, in the context of love and war. Writer/director Rie Rasmussen also plays the main character, a woman of mixed Serbian-Albanian parentage narrowly saved from rape or worse in 1999 Kosovo by a man who is, aside from a quirky feminist streak, strictly psychopathic. During her subsequent time with him in the anarchic mafiadom of Belgrade, the camera returns to her wrist wounds from the war. She worries them open again and again; we see quiet drops of blood, richly red, artistic, fall onto an etched glass bowl in one scene, contrasting with some of the more effective portrayals of violence I've seen in recent years in the cinema. We observe the betrayal of nearly every norm of decent society as Rasmussen rages at this world of ours. It's a particularly female form of rage, and I, for one, think it's about time the world take note.

The film was not perfect, with a couple of confused plot twists that may have been due to either over-writing, over-editing or a combination of the two. But when I see this sort of energy in a director's first feature film, that's something to which I play close attention. Lead actor Vojin Cetkovic from Serbia dominates the half of the film that takes place in Kosovo and Serbia. He played a bit role in my to-date, all-time Berlinale favorite, Klopka. He's a thinking-woman's psychopath whose ruminations on the societal constructions intended to make us "human" are the strongest and most startling part of Rasmussen's work. Any actor capable of making me believe someone out there could truly find it more justifiable to kill children ["after all, what do they have: at most, maybe 5, 6, 7 friends?!"] is, strictly speaking, a cinematic genius.

I saw Human Zoo during its second Berlinale screening, and the post-film environment smacked of conspiracy, into which the audience sank with palpable satisfaction. Prior to the screening, Berlinale staff indicated it wouldn't be followed by a Q&A as they didn't believe the director was present. Afterward, however, the supporting male actor, Nick Correy, jumped on stage and angrily denounced Luc Bresson, much of the time without a microphone, until one belatedly surfaced, the Berlinale crew all the while indicating that scheduling didn't allow for a Q&A. He talked about obstacles to the film's financing and production, then Rasmussen showed up very briefly on stage, after which they both took it outside the theater.

Their message was that, short days before the Berlinale, a non-disclosure agreement had been signed and Bresson's name had, from complete absence, been elevated to a prominent place on the credits, this being the first time a film with his involvement had been chosen to open the Berlinale Panorama. Interestingly, IMDb has nothing linking him with this film as of this writing. Outside, the press swirled around (Variety panned it) and I thought to myself, this film will be a hit. We'll see, but with a beautiful, angry and talented actress/ex-model-cum-director/writer at the center of an artistic controversy, it has all the elements. If it actually gets released, then run, don't walk, to see this film.
19 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Deeply personal film provides broader food for thought
17 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
**** Any spoilers are only mild ones that I feel are necessary for an honest review.****

Truthfully, I am quite surprised this film has ended up being the one most on my mind one month post-Berlinale. As soon as I saw the title I just had to get a ticket. It made me think of all sorts of things -- not just the obvious, which is Spike Lee's Jungle Fever. The most interesting has to have been the divine Ms. Vaginal Davis' musings on the eroticization of black men at the 2006 Berlin Porn Film Festival. It's taken me some time to write this review, and I'm still not satisfied -- it was not an easy film.

It's hard to put my finger on what I liked about this film. It was unapologetic, I liked that. It was strongly autobiographical and didn't pretend to be anything other than a single person's view. The director is from a graphics arts background, which undoubtedly contributed to the strong presentation throughout of numerous idealized images and clips. We learned in the post-screening discussion that the producer, who is not appropriately credited, actually played nearly as important a directorial role. Much of what I think we are watching, although all questions were off-screen, is Yusuf Valley discussing this aspect of his life with his British producer. {This was James Mitchell, I believe.}

The discussion after the Berlinale has got to be the very first Q & A that I've EVER attended, in any film festival, in which ONLY WOMEN participated and the questions were all content-oriented (as opposed to technical). But most ranged from unhappy to quite upset, and perhaps I was one of the few white women who found it, quite simply, an interesting personal examination/confession. Perhaps I thought it a bit sad that he came to the conclusions that he did, but given his background in apartheid South Africa, it's hardly any wonder. I felt he did nice work locating his experiences within the broader socio-political context. I'd love to see more work like this that examines how media-driven sexualization and stereotyping of certain groups affects those who are not part of the favored group.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Leo (I) (2007)
8/10
Something Interesting from Sweden
23 February 2008
From this year's Berlinale, one of the films that lingers in my mind is becoming conflated with a 2007 offering from the same country, Sweden. It's hardly a country that comes to mind when I think of immigrants, which just goes to show how quickly all the old patterns are changing. Last year's film was När Mörkret Faller (When Darkness Falls). It primarily starred immigrants and consisted of 3 vignettes, the first of which blew me away. It was a very psychologically complex portrayal about how a family of Turkish immigrants treat the lost "honor" of an independent-minded daughter.

Similarly, this year's offering, Leo, was also concerned with violence and its effects on victims' loved ones. The film was violent and disturbing, but I always distinguish between gratuitous violence (which is worthless) and that which teaches us something. This film, for me, definitely fell in the latter category, as Fares asks questions about young men struggling to find appropriate responses to violence, and at the same time define their manhood. In listening to the post-screening Q & A with Fares and co-star Salehi, I caught only a few glimpses of maturity and insight. But the main character was played by professional actor Terfelt and the process of filming clearly relied on a synergy between the three that added up to something greater than its individual parts. All three may merit watching in the future, to see if further talent materializes.
21 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Serbian cinema has done it again at the Berlinale
14 February 2008
You may have seen my raves over Klopka from last year's Berlinale, but this year's offering was Love and Other Crimes (Ljubav i Drugi Zlocini in the original Serbian). I got excited the moment the film started rolling and I saw it starred Klopka's haunting Anica Dobra. At the end I stood up and asked, "What on earth is happening in Serbian film and how can we see MORE?" As an American, I can't help viewing the societal collapses endemic to Eastern Europe as the stimulus behind this post-modern film noir. But the director surprised me by answering my query in this vein with a note of optimism. Sure, of course, the end of open warfare is a definite positive, but to then see your society descend into the grips of common criminals in the inexorable name of capitalism, can hardly be optimistic!? I left the theater with the feeling that this particular young director had somehow surpassed himself, overreached his inherent ability. How wonderful when this is in service to art, and with the endlessly expressive face of Dobra, it is not hard to imagine this happening. Then, in further researching the film, I see a common thread -- Srdjan Koljevic, the co-writer -- and ask myself if perhaps he is the one to watch?
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Trap (2007)
10/10
A jewel of a film: the kind that comes perhaps once a year
13 February 2007
Every serious moviegoer enters each theater with the hope that this film will be that little gem that one can expect at most once a year (and some years it doesn't happen at all). This film is that little jewel; I was lucky enough to see it at its premier in the Berlinale. It asks the question, "what is a good man"? Can a man be good in some parts of his life and not at all good in others? In life, who becomes the ultimate arbiter of goodness? The film also introduces an interesting tension around traditional gender roles -- the husband/father expected to be the provider -- even while portraying seemingly modern women. This tension is an important driving force, in addition to the difficult challenge facing the main character. The resulting violence that occurs is at once completely believable and yet shocking; seemingly ancillary to the main plot is one scene of senseless violence against a street child that is quite breath-taking. There is a great symmetry to this movie, centering around a particular street corner on which that child hustles as a window-washer. We return to this place again and again, at different times and in different psychological states. Overall this film is masterfully crafted and acted with complex layers and much to reflect upon. I recommend it in the highest terms.
91 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Exquisite window on children's suffering of war
26 April 2005
I am a movie fan who wades through a lot of alternative films in the hopes of finding the rare gem that does make it through once every few years. This film is one of them; I saw it Wednesday and turned around and saw it again on Saturday. If anything, the second time I felt like it was over FASTER, which I suppose is another sign of how exquisite this film is. It is one of the saddest films I have seen, and but it treats the pain of war in an unblinking way, recognizing that some of us simply are not equipped to carry that pain, for reasons that cannot be fathomed.

This film contains scenes framed and shot in a way you will never have seen before; the cinematography was creative and fresh. The perspectives of the children involved were haunting and wonderful. To elicit performances from these young actors (the youngest being three years old) is simply genius. I have not seen the director's previous work, but I am looking forward to exploring what I hope will be a fresh new star from a part of the world that the West desperately needs to learn about.
59 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Witty and very on-the-mark
7 June 2004
As someone who has lived in California for 12 years (a transplant from the Northeast) and has spent much of that time absolutely infuriated at the shameful treatment of a whole segment of our population, this film provided a wonderful release of frustration at the sense of entitlement of so many "Americans". This film gently reminds us of so many truths that should be self-evident to any resident of a border state (not least that residents of more than 40 countries are also "Americans").

Those of us whose ancestors emigrated from European countries would do well to remember that scant decades ago we were vilified in equally disturbing ways as Latinamericans are today. Although this film does not explicitly make this point, I would hope that viewers recognize it as a humorous appeal to avoid repeating the same old cycle of racism experienced by the Irish, Italians, Poles, Chinese, Japanese, etc etc ad nauseum.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Unexpected and Existential
18 February 2004
Much of the nuance in this movie can only be guessed at by the facial expressions of the actors. Indeed, there are often several plausible nuances, after the film takes its totally unexpected 90-degree turn mid-way.

I was expecting a rather dull, trite romance with a ho-hum, half-hearted "twist". The twist was nothing of the sort, but rather completely unexpected. It was of the sort that demands many days of subsequent reflection on the quiet sadness of parallel existences that touch, at times, so briefly, and yet profoundly affect us.

This unexpected existentiality is exactly what I look for in a film. What the directors and actors managed in this work was new and different, quiet and reflective, and ultimately quite masterful.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Monster (2003)
5/10
Ricci's leadenness simply a fatal flaw (contains minor spoilers)
16 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Perhaps I am in the distinct minority when I say that this movie fell flat on its face, due to Ricci's flat-footed "interpretation" of her role (if you can call her complete lack of nuance an interpretation at all). Ricci seems incapable of grasping the concept of the lipstick lesbian, much less the purely vulnerable, unreasoning drive for protection, acceptance, and safe haven. There is one desperate scene of "untamed passion" in which Theron drastically overacts, apparently in a desperate attempt to get some sort of reaction from Ricci. Instead Ricci just giggles uncomfortably and peeps "I thought you weren't into women".

Who could believe any straight woman would be attracted to the leaden Ricci, much less attempt major life changes to assume a role as her protector? Although Theron's performance is a valiant effort given the extreme limitations she has to deal with, it ultimately fails. The terribly misguided casting of Ricci is the fatal flaw that makes what would otherwise be qualified as a difficult (but illuminating) film, into an unwatchable one.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sublime acting
29 December 2003
This little movie is simply sublime. I ran across it again when searching for more Sergi Lopez films. His range is simply amazing, from sensitive fantasy lover (as in this film) to the most dastardly twisted villain. I would be hard-pressed to think of any more talented male actor in European film today. I particularly liked him in "Dirty Pretty Things", due to its serious, thoughtful treatment of the pressures on immigrants. "A Friend Like Harry" was just great entertainment, humor of the darkest sort.

"Une Liason Pornografique" is still another type of film altogether. The French produce many interesting films on sex, some successful, some less so. This is of the best I can recall from my own 20-year love affair with European art films. Another recent French film that I can whole-heartedly recommend is Coline Serreau's Chaos, which took several years to cross the ocean to the U.S., but was originally released in 2001. Also Chocolat by Claire Denys, another quiet but piercingly accurate character study.
37 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed