Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Tony Takitani (2004)
10/10
A love letter to loneliness
25 October 2005
*whew* It's been a while since I've been this intoxicated by a film... at least not since February's Nobody Knows.

Tony Takitani is a beautiful poem to loneliness.

The eponymous character is a quintessential loner. As the prologue informs us: His father, a WWII vet who pretty much left most of his soul in POW camp, was not much of a father. His mother died a few days after his death. He has been self-sufficient for most of his life.

We see him mostly by himself, alone near his desk, sketching drawings of motors, engines, amongst other mechanized structures. As the omniscient narrator tell us: Tony doesn't understand the fascination over paintings imbued with passion and ideology. It is certainly fitting for a man bereft of any human connection with another individual to identify with the colder, impersonal realm of mankind.

His lonely streak finally ends when he meets a woman at work. She is pretty, approachable, and most importantly of all, attracted to Tony. After a semi-rocky courting, they finally marry. Tony relishes in this foreign arrangement, but this exchange of intimacy with another person has Tony terrified. He is terrified because, as the narrator informs us, he might be lonely again, regressing back to his former state of isolation.

Maybe I'm too hypersensitive for my own good, but I wept a little when I heard these words. I felt that it could've not been a more articulate way to express the vulnerability of humans, especially the ones living in this modern age. Tony is aware of the cruel, unrelenting nature of time: Just as his mother died within days of childbirth and his father barely escaped the "thin boundaries of life and death" in POW camp, he can easily lose all this one day.

As it is, the inevitable does happen. I shall not reveal the unfortunate fate of Tony's wife and of their relationship, but the biggest rift in their marriage is her shopaholic tendencies. As she, herself, summed it up during their first encounter together: clothes help alleviate the emptiness she feels. After Tony's delicate mention about her habits, she frustratingly tries to restrain herself, only to surrender to the compulsions. In lesser hands, this subplot could've been ripe for (unintentional) camp, but in director Jun Ichikawa's hands, this consuming dysfunction only adds more layers to the film's restrained and somber mood: Tony's wife is not in control of her actions, which in turn, diverts his state of love and companionship to loneliness, once again.

With his wife gone, Tony becomes downtrodden, and then obsessed. In a Vertigo-esquire twist, he hires a woman who is the spitting image of his wife to take care of the house while wearing his wife's fashion couture wardrobe. The hired housekeeper's reaction to the extensive collection of wardrobe is more or less, abnormal--and of which, unexpectedly serves as a waking call for Tony.

Tony realizes that the only way to obliterate the obsession of his wife is to obliterate all of her clothes. As The Christian Science Monitor pointed out, one of the underlying themes of the film is "the complex relationship between objects and memories." As the narrator aptly tell us: the clothes are like lurking shadows; ghosts, if you must. What was once worn by a breathing, living body has now been only relegated to the closet. Tony could not bear looking at the clothes without thinking about her.

His father, the one who has long neglected him, passed away not much longer afterwards. Tony does the same thing to his father's belongings (a trumpet and a collection of records): he obliterated them. For what good are objects if they only remind one of pain? One could argue that although Tony and his wife shared different feelings about objects (she wanted to obtain them, whereas he wanted to obliterate them), they had one thing in common: both internalized objects into their inner selves.

The relationship humans have with objects is only a secondary theme. The film, for the most part, is simply about loneliness and how an individual such as Tony deals with that state of loneliness.

As you can tell, I love this film (otherwise, I'd probably not write so damn long). But this film is not for everyone. A couple in the movie theater gave up within twenty minutes into the film. A lady in front of me told her companion (when the movie was over) that she was tempted to sleep throughout the showing.

But if you are a sucker for atmospheric portraits of loneliness, slow and beautiful pans, and crazy about the empty urban architectural spaces in Edward Hopper's painting, then please, by all means, see Tony Takitani.
60 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nobody Knows (2004)
10/10
a film with immense humanity
27 March 2005
It has been a while since I saw a film with this much humanity. That is, until I saw acclaimed Japanese director Hirokazu Koreeda's latest, Nobody Knows, about a quartet of siblings left to fend for themselves.

It's heartbreaking, just thinking about some of these random moments subtly displayed on screen. The look on an adolescent girl's face when her mom paints her nails. A little boy making silly faces in the mirror. A little girl's scribbling of stick people on a gas bill that has been months overdue... I can go on.

I wish I can put into words, or convey in some sort of way, the flowing of rampant emotions experienced when I saw these images: about how much it hit so close to home, how much it reminded me of my own family. But I can't. I guess it simply cannot be articulated in such a concise, simplified manner.

You'll just have to see it for yourself.
89 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Garden State (2004)
5/10
Doesn't live up to Sundance buzz, but decent enough
29 July 2004
Overall, it's an okay film. Certain portions of it felt beautiful and genuine, while other parts are disappointingly incoherent and out of place. Nothing as special as the folks at Sundance would want you to believe. Braff does show some promise as a filmmaker though. And Portman lights up the screen and overshadows Braff in her supporting role.

However, don't get me started on Braff's character and his withdrawal from lithium. Life is more complex than that. People are more complex than that. Its depiction of one's psychological mindset is as deep as "A Beautiful Mind" [insert a tone of indifference here]. Call it a cross between "Harold and Maude" and "The Graduate", but with way fewer emotional truths. I give it a B-/C+.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Identity (2003)
1/10
An Example of Hollywood Filmmaking At Its Worst
23 April 2004
This is a lame "psychological" thriller that doesn't make sense at all. Writer Michael Cooney (a.k.a Charlie Kaufman's commercially-minded twin brother Donald) should have done his homework on multiple-personalities disorder before scripting this awful mess of a film. The "twist" towards the end of "Identity" was not a twist at all. It was a given---and a irrational one. It only goes to show how stupid Hollywood films have become.

On an interesting note, the distributor of "Identity," Columbia, is the same one who backed "Adaptation." I guess they have a split personality being that they like both the Brothers Kaufman, one creative and brilliant, and the other intellectually challenged.
15 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed