Reviews

13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Reacher (2022– )
2/10
Walker Texas Ranger vibes
26 December 2023
I caught the first 3 episodes of this acting was very wooden and predictable .fight scenes were very predictable it was like you were watching a rehearsal of behind the scenes footage .every punch thrown was telegraphed .I know this character is closer to the books than the movie version but the movie version was at least more entertaining .this show seemed to of been written by amateurs im not going to say one actor was better than another as all their performances were pretty unbelievable and one dimensional .Probably having to do with such a weak script to pull from .all the people giving this 8,9 and 10 rating must be either paid for bots or die hard fanboys .I give this a much deserved 2/10 over all it has a walker Texas ranger quality and feel for it .. I guess if your bored give it a try.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Billy Boy (I) (2017)
1/10
Don't watch unless you consider yourself Low Brow
17 June 2018
This movie is so bad forced me to write a review i'm not going to add spoilers as its not even worth leaking any out .The movie to me has a basketball dairy,kids,Bomb the system kind of vibe to it .All those movies were way better than this film ,this has a film student quality to it which is to say it doesn't have any quality at all.For such wooden predictable cliche writing the actors seem to over act .This is a film for pretentious tool bag hipsters/unwiped artsy fartsy asses as well as navel gazers .Very predictable story you know how its going to end even before the end .Not worth seeing at all then to top it off you have the explicit sex scene thrown in out of no where which just as out of place as the actors.Any time i see some graphic sex in a movie its a huge red flag that the movie is horrible and the sex is thrown into shock and get people talking about about a film that should of never seen the light of day what the girl from super girl was thinking by being in this is beyond me .Imdb really needs to install a negative rating system because giving this a 1 in the positive is too much i would rate this a - Negative 5 if i could .Nothing to see here folks unless you like seeing nude melissa bolona at the expense of being bored to tears by this mental masturbation fodder don't bother
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
White Girl (2016)
1/10
Don't waste time as this film offers nothing of real value
4 December 2016
i says write 10 lines ugh if only i had tuned in long enough to write ten lines i'll keep it short .

As a justin bartha fan this was the only reason my curiosity was sparked enough to want to watch this crap .WTF was he thinking ? they must of spiked his koolaid because he's too good for this tripe .The film maker made this film based of her life experiences .No need to go watch this film just .Listen to any one of the interviews shes given on the subject matter and you'll see what a empty soul she is .The main character of the film is no different she epitomizes the stereotype of blonde bimbo.She sleeps with anyone who will look in her direction does any drug shoved under her nose . The actress doesn't to bright either or think much of herself or her talents to take this role on .Maybe that's why she got the role even going as far sucking a dick on camera . For me easy nature was apparent for me the moment she decides to just make friends and get nice with the local drug pushers .Now some in the indie pseudo intellect world would defend the act on doing real sex on camera as being artistic and not at all what it appears to be . Thats bullshit you put a dick in your mouth on camera whether its real or prosthetic the act of sucking on it is unsimulated . This movie only appeals to very low brow young and dumb and or pseudo intellects of the indie film world .If you consider yourself a deplorable than this movie is for you if your a normal rational thinking person with any shred of real intelligence you'll stay away as it only reduces IQ points .Go watch the movie kids less pretentious than this film and is worth a watch avoid this at all costs if you have a life and or common sense . This movie is one of those movies that exists just for the sake of existing its all style no substance .
31 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
kelly+victor = dud
22 February 2015
I wish IMDb would delve into the negatives as well as the positive number realms because its the only way to truthfully cover films like these honestly .

Acting was decent

story was weak girl meets boy girl likes is into kinky asphyxiation type of sex .Even though she's 90 lbs soaken wet and couldn't gag a maggot .

Meaningless lives and meangingless sex equal a meaningless movie with no point or meaning 1-10 not worth your money or the time to think about or give meaning to it .You want to thought provoking material read a book .Skip this movie at any and all costs i made it 50 mins into the film and shut it off because i felt myself growing dumber by the second .Yes it was one of those films
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
if you skim through it you get a neat music video
21 June 2013
From the opening visually i liked the look of this film.It pulled you in on a visual level . That was where the intrigue stopped for me bottom line .This film is very long music video with a shoe string plot attached to it .Don't be fooled all the praise that comes from this movie is strictly fanboy.Very pretentious film starts out with trying to get to springbreak then windes up being a thelma and louise type format .The only good acting is from franco .Evertyhing else is caricatureish anyone who says harmony korine is great.Is obviously a fanboy go watch for yourself and don't listen or buy into the hype. This movie is done up by a college film student who is on the 5 year plan.If your looking for a message go to western union this movie just doesn't have a solid one .At least one that uncovers something we didn't already know about the youthes of today.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
To the Wonder (2012)
2/10
A 7 minute student film disguised as a 2 hour art film
13 April 2013
I just saw this last night and only made it to about the 20 minute marker before i came too my senses.I realized that films like this are supposed to capture some kind of aesthetic beauty.Its obvious the director is a very ambitious person .He lacks any passion though to give meaning to this film or its inhabitants.Terrence malick belongs in a art gallery ,you know the people you usually see.Sitting alone at a table hocking whatever cd's or DVD's they made in the name of art.He fails to grasp the point that films are about telling a story.Which he doesn't do very well at ,there is nothing but hype around this guy by his cult followers.

Ben affleck being the so/so talent he is, is very obvious he doesn't want to be in this film.The french woman just seems like a dandy like she doesn't know what the hell is going on.But to make it look like her character has a purpose feels the need to constantly be dancing or jumping around ;For no particular reason.The characters have no purpose the story is very bleak and bismal.The only love story i see here is T.M'S love of taking nature shots .If you've seen the first part of the film there's no need to see the second.Don't waste 2 hours seeing this film.You can go to any local film festival and see 10minute long films that are based on the same subject.Even for the curious viewer at least wait till you can see this film at a reduced price or wait till you can stream it online for free.

What malick does is being achieved by college and high school film students with the same quality.It seems like they understand how to sum up whatever message they be trying to convey. In a shorter amount of time than malick.Which after all isn't that the point ? to sum up life in its entirety ? Malick must of skipped or slept through those classes because he misses the point.To anyone with a brain who refuses to sip that coolaide cocktail that malick serves up to all his cult followers.If you want to know what this movie is about spend some time out in real life nature. It's more rewarding and you have a greater sense of fulfillment and growth as a person.Avoid this film at all costs
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Game of Thrones (2011–2019)
1/10
-9.4 rating is more like it (Horrible show)
3 April 2013
Where do i start first of all this show is HOR-RIBLE like a car wreck where a family of four gets mangled and killed horrible. I'm not trying to be mean i'm just going based off my observations.I will break this down as simple as possible.

Acting : Not good,if i were to rate the acting on a IQ scale i'd put it at 50.Which translates to being mentally retarded, the writing is some what to blame but.If these actors had any really good talent that was above average.They could make the show much better even with sh*&^% dialogue.Why any self respecting actor would chose to be on this show,is a sign that there is no good actors here at all.At least any with good judgement or integrity.Any actor with real talent would only be undermining themselves by doing this garbage.

Plot: Dungeons and dragons with lots of violence and lots of sex.Just think of eating something thats way overcooked and.You're pretty much getting the same thing here.Luckily this show has a built in audience or else it would of sank along time ago.The main ingrediant for this show has become just to shock and confuse people.To keep them interested which is usually a sign that the creators are struggling to keep this show afloat.Even going as far as throwing in the sex sounds when peter dinklage is getting his knob slobbed.It's like they had prepubescent boys in the editing room;working the sound effects.

Writing:I doubt there is any writers ,if i had to guess i would say they are just pulling dialogue right from the book verbatim.

Overall the show is held together by gum and paper clips ,theres only so many times graphic violence and sex will work .There was a scene where one of the male characters is giving a monologue with two female actresses.Performing sex acts on each other while trying to sound serious i felt embarrassed for the actor and actresses that had to put up with that.This show has absolutely NO substance what so ever the best advice i can give is this .If you want to know what this show is really like don't go to someone who is a fanboy of it .They will just sensationalize it for you.Which will just winde up misleading you to wasting your time watching this junk.This show trys

way to hard and doesn't deserve any of credit for its efforts. I wish IMDb allowed for negative numbered ratings so i could give this a proper rating.EPIC FAIL
73 out of 226 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Simply awful even for a porno
10 March 2013
I remember the first saw this show it was by chance and i caught it late night;on hbo.I just seen and ending clip with the sex and thought it was typical late night softcore cinemax type show.You know the ones with really cheesy acting and story lines.When i realized this was a actual show i couldn't believe it .When i came on IMDb and checked it out and saw the ratings my heart nearly stopped.I wish the ratings went into a negative.So i could give this a truthfully honest rating that it deserves whats so bad about it ?;where do i start .

The writing is bad you can tell by the dialogue its either that or the actors are bad or both.Usually you can tell the difference between a good actor dealing with bad dialogue.In the case of this show it doesn't matter they are both equally bad.I think the worse part of it is how these actors actually think they are doing something worth watching .There is absolutely no redeeming quality too this show what so ever. Some people might call this ground breaking ,colored t.v in the 60's was ground breaking.This is just mild core porn and considering the time and era we live in. This shows content is truly irrelevant in todays world .They seriously should of left out the sex.They should of hired experienced writers instead first year out of college grads.This is a show that just doesn't give crap .Know one here bothered to actually create something new and original.Their only concern was throwing spaghetti against the wall and seeing what stuck.Don't waste your time or life with this show read a book,you'll get so much more in return.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cosmopolis (2012)
1/10
5.4 ? Only in the bizarro world don't waste your time
30 October 2012
I was put on to this movie after seeing and interview with the beautiful Sarah gadon.After hearing a lot about it i figured what the hell i had nothing else to do .Immediatly the feeling i got when watching this.Went from bad to just pit of my stomach horrible.Atrocious is usually a term used when describing a horrible wreck of some kind.Here it's just as befitting a term the same with the word wreck.

*Robert pattison's performance and acting were hands down thee worst acting i've ever seen in my life.He should seriously quit after he's done doing those silly twilight films.It truly does pay off to be a good looking face in Hollywood.Im considering getting some plastic surgery myself so i can look just as good as him.Maybe that will end all my poverty as and actor and i can be another rich talentless hack.

*Dialogue : hands down the dialogue was horrible it was like the writer didn't exert the slightest effort .Which left me scratching my head like what is the point of even making a movie like this .Just about all the actors ,acted as if they were trying to remember facts from a text book .It was unbelievable ,dry and filled with rhetoric that i don't think the writer himself as well as the cast .Could or ever would be able to understand in two life times. I don't know why sarah gadon agreed to do this film .It seems like no one even bothered to read to script.The excuse of croneberg directing was enough for these people? pathetic.Which is sad ,i'm and aspiring actor if i was offered a part in this movie.After i read the script i would of taken it into the bathroom.Made my business and wiped my ass with every page before handing it back.With a NO WAY IN HELL attached. I've seen college short films that blow this one out of the water .Please if you want to destroy brain cells in a more creative way.Drink the butane out of a lighter.Or drop some acid tablets at least you'll have a more fulfilling experience. AVOID THIS MOVIE AT ALL COSTS PLEASE. Its not worth it there are kids starving in this world.Who could use that $10 David cronenberg doesn't deserve it .Even donating it to robert pattison so he can enroll in legit acting course.Would be a better way of spending your hard earned cash.
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lie with Me (2005)
1/10
Makes lifetime movies good
2 August 2012
I just watched this movie and automatically the first thing that popped into my head was .Lifetime special ,this was horrible even from a lifetime perspective .The main actress isn't interesting her male co star isn't interesting either .At times i wonder what why he was even there. For anyone who sits there's and says this is about love and relationships .You need to get your head checked this is about sex plain and simple . i kind of got the feeling of this being a lazy effort to resemble last tango .Fail big time at least tango had actual talented actors .I guess in a way this movie suits the talent or lack there of.Nothing artistic at all about this the director needs a serious reality check.When are people like this going to be banned from trying to pass pornographic films off art ? its insulting
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shame (2011)
1/10
Shame on you steve mcqueen for not doing your homework
6 July 2012
I finally went back and watched the ending of this movie so now i can give a full honest review .

The real shame with this movie is putting someone who calls himself and "artist" and not a director in charge.

The movie lacked fall from grace now seeing the complete performance i see that Fassbender's performance at times seemed strained or overacted .Mulligans performance like the movie itself seemed to be part of the background fluff .The 3some and and gay blowjob were pointless rock bottom scenario's .If a 3some with prostitutes constitutes a justifiable rock bottom for a sex addict.This movie should of ended with in the first 5mins of starting . As fassbender's character is seen with multiple prostitutes

Addiction is a sensitive topic and should be in the hands of a pro not amateur with a big ego. The subject of addiction here is so shallow and surface level;who are these people who are saying this deserves nominations ? .How this movie gets and almost 8 rating is ridiculous;Shame on the director. For not educating himself on the subject matter more deeply.Shame on the actors for not knowing better
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spartacus (2010–2013)
2/10
Good quality ? yeah right maybe On syfy network
3 April 2012
i just got done watching a few episodes of this show .which was more then i needed to see.

i understand its on t.v and you have a budget but this show is horrible it's like a cheesy scifi channel rip off of 300 .the CGI graphic's are laughable .the gore and violence is almost slapstick .the nudity and sex of course are thrown in to sell the show .my opinion most times when any kind of show or film throws in excessive nudity or graphic almost pornographic sex scene .You know it's to distract from the lack of quality of that particular show or film your watching . or to attract .the dialogue by far is the worst part of the show .even in 300 they didn't speak like as if they were modern day new yorkers ..it feels like this show was written by a bunch of high school seniors who skipped or didn't study hard enough in there history class during school.it's insulting to anyone with a half a brain .which according to the ratings given on this board the viewers are lacking big time . This show is a disgrace to the movie it's not even a close resemblance If you want a true spartacus experience watch the movie .its more accurate to the story and history .They should of just saved half of the money they put into hiring those writers and instead given them history lessons as well as writing lessons blah what a waste of time
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shameless (2011–2021)
3/10
i'll give it a "T" For trying
30 March 2012
This show mimic's the original version in a bastardized sort of way .

w.h macy's portrayal of the drunken absentee father is very 1 dimensional and unbelievable compared to the u.k father character. the grittiness of the original series is what makes it funny and great .which this show is lacking . the u.s version actors seem to be dolled up caricatures of actual people..the u.k version gives more authenticity once again with the grittiness.the characters on the u.k show resemble actual people almost like we are watching the real lives of people living in this condition.

If your looking for authenticity and good humor as well as a great show .Do yourself a favor and get the original version .
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed