Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Cute
3 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This sequel adopts the same nostalgic narration technique and tone used in the original. Set in the 1970s following the passing of Ralphie's "Old Man," it answers the question, "Whatever became of Ralphie Parker?" Brother Randy and buddies Flick and Schwartz also appear, played by the same actors as in the original. This one doesn't have many (any?) new wacky scenes, but instead has frequent allusions to those in the original. Nevertheless, you could still enjoy this sequel without having watched the original.

I enjoyed the general feel-good feeling of the movie. It was able to do it without being schmaltzy like the Christmas rom-coms or preachy like the Christmas dramas.

The ending is extremely well crafted!

This is a movie did not disappoint.

Be sure to watch through the credits!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jesus Camp (2006)
10/10
Even more shocking through the lens of history
16 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This documentary was probably scary when it was made in 2006, but it's even scarier in the lens of history. It was prescient in 2006 and is instructive 2021.

I'll try to give as few spoilers as possible. The movie follows Becky Fischer, founder of Kids on Fire camp in Devils Lake (really!), North Dakota, and three children who are campers: Levi, 12; Rachael, 9; and Tori, 10. Levi and Rachael are friends and go to the same church in ND. Tori has traveled in from Kansas. It tells the story through vignettes of the children at home, at church, at camp, at play, and in other evangelical contexts (rallies and evangelizing strangers). There's no commentary between the vignettes. The opposing view is presented through conversations with Fischer and Mike Papantonio, a Christian radio host who doesn't agree with the politicization of religion or the techniques used to indoctrinate children.

The film opens with a Fischer making a comparison with her camp's indoctrination of children vs. Muslims'. Keep in mind, this is only 5 years from 9/11, and there's a lot of Islamophobia in the culture. She justifies her indoctrination by saying that some Muslims indoctrinate their children to carry guns or wear suicide vests. Then, the movie unfolds...

Much of the film shows stuff that's just part of the Pentecostal religion: praying in tongues, praying over the chairs in the building before the kids arrive. But there's a strong sense that the kids are indoctrinated, and in much more than religion. For example, one student, while being homeschooled is told "Science doesn't prove anything." The child is taught that Galileo was bad for choosing science over religion. In the same scene are discussions of why climate change is insignificant and evolution isn't real.

The picture the film presents of Fischer is not a pretty one. The movie was filmed when the Harry Potter books and movies were popular, and some of the kids had seen them. Fischer calls the characters in the series "enemies of God," and says that if Harry Potter had been in the Old Testament, he would have been put to death. Really, lady? At the main meeting, Fischer calls the kids "phonies and hypocrites." I know that a core tenet of Christianity is that humans are inherently sinful, but come on, these are kids! The kids are all crying, and one kid confesses that he's not sure he believes in God.

What's most disturbing, however, is the constant drumbeat of war. At one point, a white man with a South African accent tells the kids to "Break the power of the enemy over government" as the kids work themselves into a frenzy smashing cups with a hammer. At one point, Fischer says "make war with (government)," "This means war. Are you ready for it?" The kids are shown a cardboard cutout of then president George W. Bush and are told to "Do some warfare for him" at which point they begin speaking in tongues. At another point, two children tell the interviewer that they feel like they're "being trained to be warriors" At another point, a girl marvels that before her friends' dads, who are missionaries, go to a dangerous place, their kids rally around, jumping and shouting "Martyr! Martyr!"

With all the drumbeats of war, the scariest statement is from Fischer herself: "I think democracy is the greatest political system on earth, but that's just it. It's jus what's on earth. Ultimately, it's designed to destroy itself because we have to give everyone equal freedom."

The kids in the film are now in their mid to late 20s. We have to wonder. I think this is an important movie for everyone in America.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A real tearjerker!
22 October 2006
I just got back from the San Jose Jewish Film Festival, where I saw this film.Out of 10 points, I give this movie 11! At so many points, I was crying, cheering or yelling at the screen. This movie has everything: drama, love, racism, triumph (more than once), family relations.

As the description says, it is set first in Ethiopia, where a mother forces her son to leave and go with a Jewish woman so that he can live. He arrives in Israel through Operation Moses, and soon is adopted by an Israeli family.

Many times, he is faced with an Israeli society that doesn't accept him. In addition, he has a yearning to communicate with and be reunited with his mother. Each twist will bring out an emotion in you.

If you remain dry-eyed throughout this film, place a mirror in front of your mouth and nose and check for moisture.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Left Luggage (1998)
8/10
poignant
8 February 2005
There are movies about the tension between secular and religious Jews, and movies about Holocaust survivors. This one is both.

Chaiyah, a Jewish college-aged woman in Antwerp, Belgium, couldn't care less about her family's stories, and she finds the Chasidim to be particularly weird. A child of the sexual revolution, she's concerned with having a good time.

Through a family friend, she finds a job as a nanny for a Chasidic family. Although she's ready to quit the first day, she quickly develops a — no, a kinship — with the youngest boy with severe emotional difficulties. The boy, Simcha, can't speak, even though he's four, and when he's under pressure, he wets himself. Chaiyah brings him out. He begins talking, and even sings the Mah Nishtanah at the Seder.

The film shows us reasons for the Chasidic father's seeming aloofness to the youngest son, overt and less than overt anti-Semitism in Europe ("You don't look Jewish.") , and the ways the older generation has of dealing or coping with the past.

As the film progresses, Chaiyah becomes bonded with her people, which I think is the meaning of the final scene.

Some of the scenes can't really be appreciated without an understanding of Jewish culture and practice. I think this is particularly true of one of the late scenes between the two main women characters. It really floored me.

It's a real tear-jerker, but it's not without its happy moments.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed