Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
I wanted to love it but - meh. By Christie standards it's below par
17 March 2024
Well, the scenery and locations didn't disappoint. They're absolutely gorgeous (filmed in Scotland I believe).

Agatha Christie stories are pretty rote so the bar isn't too high, but this two-parter didn't manage to clear it.

The body count was really too high for Our Hero (Luke Fitzwilliam) to sink his teeth into any one murder and frankly while he did ID the killer in the end ... he was one step behind the whole way, unlike say Miss Marple.

About the casting and the plot line:

I was very distracted by the fact that David Jonsson's left eye is much smaller than his right. There are many many closeups of his face where this affected my ability to focus on the plot.

Apparently in order to justify casting a Black actor in the lead role, they gave him a back story as being from a rich Nigerian family and coming to London to work in a diplomatic post as an attache to some British muckymuck. He speaks with a posh accent and there is almost no relevance to his African background in terms of the plot.

We get some stereotypical racist comments about "mud huts" from the local high and mighty lord of the manor, but almost everybody else in the film basically just accepts him and appears virtually color-blind. In 1954 rural England? I dunno about that.

Also, he's not given much to do, other than to wander around snooping, and then give a knowing smile in almost every scene.

The dialogue he was given to say didn't help at all.

I couldn't help feeling, this would have been a much better production if they'd just stuck with a snoopy old maid like Miss Marple as the detective.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uninteresting cases, uninteresting acting, uninteresting profiling
16 March 2024
11 episodes, 11 cases, 11 serial killers, exactly zero are memorable. We get endless scenes of profiler Micki Pistorius lighting cigarette after cigarette, closeups of her face looking blank (but she's thinking DEEP and TORTURED thoughts, we're meant to believe), and then when she talks, it's not exactly the stuff of genius. This show needed a lot more of the science of profiling.

And please explain how her alleged skills actually CAUGHT anyone? Then, after a killer is caught, she's supposed to swoop in and save the day by coaxing a confession out of him - with basically "tell me about your childhood." That's apparently all it takes for a killer to suddenly confess? PUH-LEEZE.
12 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Berlin Station (2016–2019)
Poor plotting, ridiculous dialogue, weak supporting cast, nice locations
14 December 2018
Ridiculous plotting, the writers don't care about even having their spies practise good spycraft. Like, if you sneak into a location to find an employee's file, don't put it back in the FRONT of the cabinet out of alphabetical order after you've waltzed in (on video) and asked for that employee, then snuck into the office to find the employee's address.

The actors can't pull off the idea that they are experts in geopolitical forces. And the characters keep having to do really dumb things. I never for a second think any of this silliness could actually happen in the real world. And would other reviewers please stop comparing this to John LeCarre? He was a master of the spy novel. This is a spy CARTOON in comparison to LeCarre's work!

But saving the worst for last, Ashley Judd is simply awful. You never believe for one second when she's on screen that she's anybody other than Ashley Judd trying to act all serious like she thinks a CIA station chief would act, and - gah.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Without a Trace: Hang on to Me (2003)
Season 1, Episode 13
In my top 5 of the best episodes of television drama EVER
18 April 2013
Periodically I see this episode on reruns of "Without a Trace" on ION TV and even though I know how it turns out, I watch it intently every time because it is TV drama at its finest. Charles S. Dutton is PITCH PERFECT as a father whose son went missing 5 years earlier on a camping trip, who cannot give up hope and is obsessed with finding his son. His desperation and determination show on his face in every scene, even without words. His marriage has fallen apart, he and his wife are divorced, and he resents her because he thinks she has moved on, while he cannot. He even loses his job because he can't focus on anything but finding his son.

This one will have you bawling tears at the end. I won't say whether they're tears of joy, or tears of heartbreak. But however it ends, it seems like the right ending.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed