What's with all these critics here comparing "Allied" with the 1942 classic "Casablanca"? Just because early scenes are set in Casablanca, according to many reviewers here, then the films are obviously closely related as can be seen by the "many references and similarities to 'Casablanca'". Excuse me, but have I missed something - I cannot name even one character or incident in "Allied" that can be compared with those in the 1942 film. Not one!
Please help me out here - I'm absolutely perplexed by the insinuations made by those who come across as know-nothing know-alls.
Oh, and must every two human beings who have a loving relationship exude this so called chemistry? The absence of flying sparks, according to reviewers here, definitely spells failure and any such portrayal on screen points assuredly to lousy acting by those involved!
Some need to appreciate life as it is, not what they think it should be.
Overall, a most entertaining and meaningful film about love and war.
Please help me out here - I'm absolutely perplexed by the insinuations made by those who come across as know-nothing know-alls.
Oh, and must every two human beings who have a loving relationship exude this so called chemistry? The absence of flying sparks, according to reviewers here, definitely spells failure and any such portrayal on screen points assuredly to lousy acting by those involved!
Some need to appreciate life as it is, not what they think it should be.
Overall, a most entertaining and meaningful film about love and war.
Tell Your Friends