Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Rome (2005–2007)
Rome is where the heart is...missing...(but who cares!)
29 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Actually, that is unfair but this first episode had so many characters to introduce and so many story lines to kick off it was a wonder we had enough time for any emotional content. But what a feast for the senses, though. Gritty Roman battle against the Gaul (I believe more accurate looking than the free-for-all at the start of "Gladiator" by incorporating real Legion tactics...cool!). And there was some bit of emotional context or at times a glaring and purposeful lack of it. In one scene, Julius Caesar is giving a message that his daughter has died in childbirth. What would normally be a tender scene of loss we soon find to be one of cunning in that he is obviously more worried about the political loss (his daughter was married to his "friend" and rival...the daughter being the last real bond of peace between them). Yet in another scene, a woman we think to be callous and calculating (and she is) goes to great spiritual and religious lengths to ensure the safety of her son (and if Sunday mass was like this today, I would...well, be a vegetarian is all I can say).

I liked the small touches. The emphasis that Rome is a dirty, graffiti covered city (not the marble, uber-clean one of other movies and shows) is cool (in fact, graffiti plays a huge part in the stunning opening credits, oddly enough). And for those that do not think it "current" enough or out of date, there is an almost heavy handed scene where the Roman senate rails against Caesar and his 8 year "illegal war" and how it uses resources better used elsewhere and how the lives of their soldiers are being wasted on a useful fight. Again, almost heavy handed but it was clear where the filmmaker's point of view stands on the current war in the Middle East.

It has blood (a ton), it has sex (again, a lot) and it has cruel politics (in excess). It is everything this summer's "Empire" wanted to be but couldn't because it was made for prime time commercial television. Thank the Roman god's for HBO and their willingness to continually put out challenging and interesting programming in a way that can't be done anywhere else on the television right now. While I hope that the pace slows down a bit to explore the dozen or so main characters or so (some we know from history like Caesar, Brutus, Pompey, Octavian, and Marcus Anthony but others we don't like Titus and Lucius, the "common" soldiers introduced as well).
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A touching and funny homage to Spaghetti Westerns and film-making in general.
21 February 2005
Even if you aren't a fan of Sergio Leone's run of Western's shot in Spain on the cheap, you will still enjoy this movie. From the loving throwback title sequence to the obtuse Western camera angles to the heartfelt story of a boy connecting to his long lost grandfather, there is a lot to love in this picture. The standard Western archetypes are there but each one with a twist. Some aren't even known by names, simply by what they do in the Western re-enactment town. There is Hanged Man, Dragged Man (who is constantly being dragged by a rope behind a horse...it is his only trick, by golly, and he uses it for everything!) and the Sheriff and the Indians. Shootouts, pratfalls, drinkin', whorin', and by golly old fashioned quick draw shootouts. As an homage it is wonderful, from the claustrophobic close-ups, bird's eye angle on a dusty western street, Morricone-sounding music and Western bravado. As an homage to the love of film, it works as well. I will be surprised if it makes it to American shores uncut, though. There is a funny scene in it involving a prostitute and a young boy that is at once innocent and funny and oddly creepy. It is a funny scene, reminiscent of similar scenes in "Almost Famous" but in the US where the flash of a breast on TV causes seizures, it just won't pass the mustard. Which is too bad, because this is top film-making but what I am reading more and more as "the next Peter Jackson" or "next Robert Rodriquez." There are too few directors of that ilk, so give this one a try when it comes out on DVD or, if you are lucky, to the nearest art house cinema.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed