Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Ad Astra (2019)
7/10
'Ad Astra" Review: A dramatic self-discovery journey unmatched by its visual spectacle.
21 September 2019
With 'Ad Astra', the take on the exploration of space makes a hard turn to the self-discovery drama, and pays less attention to the "fiction" part of its exuberant science display. Brad Pitt delivers a fine performance in a film that does enough to impress on the audience the inner struggles of its protagonists, but on a far more underwhelming level as its technical achievements.

Pitt portrays Roy McBride, a Major in the military's space division in "the near future." Pitt is summoned by his superiors and is informed that the catastrophic events of "the Surge" are believed to be linked to a an expedition called The Lima Project, which was headed by Roy's father, Clifford (Tommy Lee Jones). With evidence to believe Clifford may still be alive, the protagonist is assigned by the space military the mission of making contact with his father. What ensues is a self-reflective exploration of the protagonist's soul, and not so much of space itself.

The protagonist's principal conflict lies on his learning Clifford might be alive years after the "Lima Project" lost contact with humanity. Roy's depressive state of mind is the strongest part of Pitt's performance - his commitment to the mission of finding his father is founded on his sense of distance towards him. At one point, Helen Lantos (Ruth Negga) reveals to Roy information about his father that complicates both the moral and physical journey of the protagonist, and Pitt brilliantly manages to convey the heavy toll his family history takes on his psyche.

James Gray directorial vision is at a masterful level, even if his narrative isn't necessarily up to par. Gray somehow manages to keep us in awe of the technological reality of this future in an unexpected subdued and subtle manner. The mundanity of characters entering a rocket ship to the Moon and being tended to by flight attendants floating around the cabin is mesmerizing. As extraordinary as the military bases and overall structures in space and both in the Moon and in Mars seems to us, the audience, Gray also conveys humanity's integration of this new world into its quotidian life.

Gray's finds ways around the fabric of space to provide us with truly awe-inspiring images, but none that seemed unmatched or that stand out from other, just as memorable past efforts.

The biggest fault in 'Ad Astra' is perhaps a sense of narrative closure that seems small compared to the vastness of its visual spectacle. Sure, the story is ultimately a coherent one; but its sense of finality seems dissonant with its thematic. It seems as if Gray gave in to the question of what looking to the stars can tell us about our search for a purpose.

As implausible as the scientific endeavors of 'Ad Astra' might seem to us at this time, the movie is more keen to emphasize on our own struggle to find meaning for our existence. Looking to the stars for answers is certainly materially impossible as far as we are concerned today, and definitely within the technological grasp of Gray's "near future". But no matter which world, Gray seems to suggest, our human condition will bind our quest for meaning even beyond the stars. Although Roy McBride's story isn't a particular profound meditation on this matter, it is ultimately arresting enough on an aesthetic level to make us, the audience keep looking to the stars in 'Ad Astra' for answers.

7/10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Lego 2: Review
27 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The Lego Movie 2 is one of the films of 2019 that will need to provide a reason for their existence. The first Lego Movie's (2014) monumental success launched the Lego movie franchise and solidified the popular and critical recognition of its master creators, Phil Lord and Christopher Miller. While the films two spin-off followups (Lego Batman in 2017 and Lego Ninjago in 2018, where Lord and Miller were not as involved in the creative process) made it hard to keep the Lego momentum going, the duo proves in Lego 2 that they are indispensable to the magic that gives life to Lego. They provide director Mike Mitchell with a script as hilariously smart and sharp as their first one that completely justifies not only the existence of the The Second Part, but also of future installments.

Lord and Miller perfectly position the story with the characters from the first film in their original setting, down at their owner's (Finn) basement, five years after were they left off, only now the toys' have been immersed in a post-apocalyptic, Mad Max environment beautifully brought to life with stunningly crisp animation. Emmet (Chris Pratt), Lucy/Wyldstyle (Elizabeth Banks), and Lego Batman (Will Arnett) are again given center stage now in a world devastated by Finn's sister Bianca and her own collection of lego figures. The first act of the film separates Emmet from Lucy in an absurdly crazy capture sequence that is filled with hilarious, witty one-liners that layer upon each other and amount to a whole of a comedic sequence, as satisfying as an genuinely good stand-up segment. But what makes this part of the film shine is how on top of that which the audience is expecting of Lord and Miller and their legos, the film touches on how the protagonists' roles in the past can be complicated in terms of gender as their new adventure reflects the conflict between a boy (Finn) and a girl (Bianca).

Lucy, along with Lego Batman and a few other characters, are taken by General Mayhem (Stephanie Beatriz), who is bewildered by the silliness of the wasteland's crew while on a stormtrooper-like white suit and helmet and carrying a pink laser blaster that is creatively realized and adds to the thematic contrast of the sequence. The soldier wanders off to the "Sistar Universe" (Bianca's bedroom) where Queen Watevra Wa'Nabi, a heart-shaped shapeshifter figure brilliantly voiced by Tiffany Haddish, awaits their arrival for her marriage celebration. The scene develops into a music/dance number where a firstly reluctant Lego Batman falls for Queen Wa'Nabi's charms as self-referential D.C jokes are hilariously woven together with the lyrics. Lucy, meanwhile, is set on trying to escape while also resisting the idea, suggested by Mayhem in the previous kidnapping sequence, of Emmet being less of a hero than she is for not being a warrior.

Lord and Miller set Emmet on his own quest to save Lucy despite his less than ideal combative skills. The directors create, within the context of the protagonists' relationship, a complication of themes such as masculinity and female empowerment. Emmet comes across Rex Dangervest (Chris Pratt), who offers his help and experience with conflicts in the past as a long neglected toy - lost under the family's washing machine. The film later reveals Rex's evil inclinations in a clever and surprising twist that questions the association of a combative personality with gender roles.

Lord and Miller connect the toys' story with their owners' as they step outside the animation world and depict a sibling fight between Finn and Bianca that results in their mother (Maya Rudolph) confiscating the toys, which is portrayed in the legos' world as the "Ourmomageddon" (foreseen by Emmet in the beginning of the movie), in an amusingly chaotic sequence that holds onto the comedy and keeps the challenging moral assessment of the story at its center.

The twist provides the opportunity for the toys' reconciliation, while at the same time Finn comes to the realization that destroying his sister's play set maybe was not the best way to resolve to the issue of who would get to play with the legos. The sophistication of connecting the world of animation to the real world is masterfully replicated once more by Lord and Miller, who elevate the material by throwing in a complex story dynamic that will most certainly linger with moviegoers, regardless of age.

Lord and Miller construct an amazing social commentary that is just as commendable as the innovative comedic sensibility with which they enchanted their audience in the first film. While Mitchell does a fantastic job materializing Lord and Miller's amazing script, the franchise's original masterminds solidify their uniqueness in bringing bold ideas to their work that builds on their reputation and leaves the viewer impatient for the next one.

8.5/10
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
'Going in Style': Review
5 April 2017
Joyful, hilarious, touching, exciting. "Going in Style" fits in all these categories, proving how age does not – and should not – deprive actors of comedic spirit. Michael Cane ('Joe'), Morgan Freeman ('Willie'), and Alan Arkin ('Al') give such good performances to the point that moments of lack of subtlety – from both the script and the direction – are minimized instead of forgiven. It is a hell of a good time from beginning to end.

Down on their luck, the three old friends struggle to simply get through the day is becoming more unbearable each day. 'Joe' is under the pressure of bank eviction notices, 'Willie' has to overcome the distance from the family, and 'Al', well, could not care less as long as he is not alone. Alan Arkin, by the way, steals every scene – "Little Miss Sunshine" vibes.

Their situation reaches its breaking point when their pensions are frozen. The three leads decide to rob their mutual bank and this part of the plot is what defines this movie for what it is. On the one hand, it plays up, to the maximum level, all the possible jokes and funny moments applicable to the circumstance – and the payoff includes a supermarket scene that I will not forget so soon. Another way it works is with the sneaky and twisty nature of the bank robbery operation – orchestrated with the help of 'Jesus' (John Ortiz). These do not just make sense, but they are truly clever.

The part where it comes across as not as bright is in its efforts of justifying the leads actions. Of course, situations like this can and do very well happen, and are genuine injustices. Michael Cane sells that emotion with a few dramatic scenes involving his granddaughter in the film 'Brooklyn', played by Joey King. It is, however, in dealing with the circumstances of the robbery and the nature of such a situation that it falls short. Again, this is does not get in the way of it being a good and fully enjoyable film; it only keeps it from having that extra level of much appreciated sophistication.

Ultimately, "Going in Style" does what it came to theaters to do: get constant, big, and loud laughs from the audience. It provides spectators with incredible 90 or so minutes of good fun at the movies. Despite hilarious supporting performances by Christopher Lloyd as 'Milton' and Ann-Margaret as 'Annie', the three Oscar winners leads carry this film with such class and wit that it makes it really hard not to enjoy the trip to the theater.

7.5/10
42 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Logan (2017)
8/10
"Logan" Review: Hugh Jackman, forever.
2 March 2017
It will be extremely hard for to continue the "X-Men" franchise after "Logan", should they choose to do so. This film is so immersed into itself that the potential consequences from the events that take place here put a huge question mark on not only if the films will continue, but also if they should continue. "Logan", apart from that, will make you leave the theater with your heart in your mouth, potentially bringing a tear out of your eye. Director James Mangold has put together a film for Hugh Jackman that marks and defines "The Wolverine" forever.

Set in the year of 2029, "Logan" presents Logan (Hugh Jackman) under circumstances that are very allusive and connected to the character's past. Patrick Stewart's performance as Charles Xavier is so vulnerable and realistic that it makes for more than usual humanely devastating moments during the film. Xavier copious seizures and Alzheimer's symptoms require Logan's care, with the help of Caliban (Stephen Merchant) who unlike the other two does not contribute to the film's strong sentimentality. X-23, played by Dafne Keen, serves as the link between Xavier and Logan's relationship.

It is Stewart's performance, along with Jackman's, the driving force of "Logan". To think back on all that Logan and Xavier have gone through in the past, particularly the many instances when Logan did things he never wanted to do and took solace in Xavier's words, is heart breaking. Here we have a Professor X who is dealing with a terrible mistake from the past that is linked to the disappearance of most, presumably, mutants, while being taken care of by Logan, who is not only dealing with his physical disease – adamantium poisoning – but also with the fact that he cannot truly find a purpose to continue to live under these circumstances.

That is the film's greatest achievement. The depiction of these characters' lives in such a completely different lens from what it what also seen in "X-Men" and "Wolverine" movies do indeed, though not entirely, justify the "Dark Knight" comparison. What make it close to Christopher Nolan's 2008 masterpiece are the subtle moments; the moments when the eyes, a walk, or the tone of voice allows the audience into the character's soul. In a farmhouse scene halfway through the movie, Xavier delivers a speech in bed when he speaks of how long he had not felt as happy he was in that moment. It is simply mesmerizing. From Stewart's performance, to the sublime use of sunlight and melancholic aura of the frame.

Where it falls short of being Nolan-worthy, however, is in balancing the overall tone of the film. This lack of subtlety is mainly due to choices related to Keen's performance and the use of explicit language. The language is not the problem. The problem is when the audience laughs at a curse word, when it was clearly not the intention behind the camera. This, of course, has to do with Mangold's poor choices. It is perhaps due to business reasons, to keep in a humorous aspect to the film that Fox feels necessary business-wise. Or, perhaps – and I would like to believe this to be the case – it is purely Mangold's own personal choice. That would mean that yes, he was trying to do the film's realistic and poignant tone justice and simply made the wrong choice. That only proves just how hard it is to make a superhero movie in this fashion, and how Christopher Nolan is, indisputably, a genius.

"Logan" is the coming of age "X-Men" movie. It is the culmination of the story of the character that was defined as the face of the franchise. It hits you like a train; it catches you off-guard, and out of the blue you are experiencing a movie dealing with disease, with death, with finding a purpose to keep on going. In a western. In a "Wolverine" movie. This one is special.

8.5/10
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
'A Bigger Splash': Superb acting forces make up for a slightly flawed script.
9 September 2016
The joyful experience of watching the unfolding of the indie style in a film where there is essentially no missteps in the acting level: 'A Bigger Splash' brings about that feel. Despite falling flat on certain points of the story, Luca Guadagnino, the film's director, beautifully captures not only the intense and profound relationships between his characters, but also is able to make good use of the European spirit, along with his cinematographer Yorick Le Saux, with stunning visuals shots of a variety of locations in the Italian island of Pantelleria.

The film only hinders itself in its conduction of some of its four lead characters within the narrative of the story. Despite brilliant performances across the board, Dakota Johnson's character (Penelope) seems to be overshadowed by the grandiosity brought in by Tilda Swinton and Ralph Fiennes to their performances. Matthias Schoenaerts' character (Paul), although being well fleshed out in the story, seems constantly adrift throughout the unfolding of the narrative surrounding Fiennes' and Swinton's characters.

Fiennes (Harry), whose display of range in recent years has been shockingly fascinating at this point in his career, masters every line delivered. So immersive is Fiennes himself in his performance that no one can help but feel very much in touch with the character he has created. At the same level, Swinton beautifully captures the intended chemistry between her character and Fiennes'. Even more impressive as she sells almost every scene in the film without saying a word, as her character (Marienne - a rock star) recovers from vocal cord surgery.

With the exceeding performance of the acting level, Luca Guadagnino (director) puts together a solid film, where the missteps of the storytelling might be disregarded by some, as the top notch acting, cinematography and for the most part Guadagnino's directing are simply too enthralling to be distracted from. 7.8/10
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed