Change Your Image
waitwhatmedia
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againReviews
Bipolar (2014)
So, so dire.
Being unfamiliar with any of the team involved, I was only drawn to this title due to having bipolar disorder myself. The film effectively manages to portray bipolar disorder about as well as Birth of a Nation portrayed people of colour. The major difference being BoaN is an accomplished film whilst this one is barely palatable.
To the film's defence, the camera choices were interesting (all static, portrayed as a cross between a vlog and found-footage), and some of the ideas it had were unique, but in general, the film isn't even bad or camp enough to be risible. Some bad films manage to be so bad they supersede their badness. They're destructive yet beautiful: like watching a building collapse or a cliff fall into the ocean. This was more like watching a melon being thrown against a wall. Destructive but also baffling, slightly unsettling, and leaving me with the realisation that there are so many better things in the world I could have just watched.
Acting-wise there were several attempts at comments on the banalities of life a la Tarantino and I'm still undecided as to whether or not the actors failed the screenplay there or vice versa (although I suspect it is both. I'm always wary of films that have "Hey bro!" and "Hey, it's me, your father" within the same scene. something something show-don't-tell). What I am certain of is that the acting for the vlog sections are continuously awful. The quality of the acting in combination with the median chosen reminds me less of an actual movie and more of a poor audition tape.
This doesn't even begin to tread the horrors of the actual narrative - it's kind of like the opposite of Limitless. Rather than taking a mentally healthy person and making them even better, we take a mentally ill person and make them even worse.
Following suit it begins to make use of as many clichés and inaccuracies as one can imagine about bipolar disorder. They're almost forgivable insofar as the film blames the symptoms that our protagonist is under - the violent outbursts, split personality, and so forth on the medication. That is until the second act where we learn that the medication was a placebo and our main character is actually an incredibly violent individual who bears traits that aren't akin to the disorder at all. The thing that pushes this film from a "truly bad" to "diabolical" is how it plays the psychotic murderer card, the split personality card, the no-chance-for-cure card for dramatic effect, and does so in a world where those beliefs are already so prominent and so damaging to the people who actually suffer with the disorder.
The film finishes with the wide shot of what the image of the film's poster is - and we are greeted with the overlay of text: "Harry Poole was judged and sentenced to life. He did not stay in prison for long and was sent to a mental institution. The psychiatrists tried their best to cure him, but they were facing someone incurable named Edward Grey." (I should note that this film is not based on a true story).
It's the campfire ending - the "it was the baby on the phone all along" ending, the "but he has been dead for 200 years" ending and so on. Therein lies as much as we need to know about the film: nobody should ever take anything about this film seriously. Fortunately, given the acting, screenplay, and narrative choices, it seems likely that anyone inclined to make such a mistake would be unable to sit through this film to do so anyway.