Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Willy Wonka, Willy Wonka, the amazing chocolateer, Willy Wonka, Willy Wonka, everybody give a cheer!
22 July 2005
I saw this movie just yesterday, and I was very impressed. Tim Burton's version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a feast for the eyes and the imagination.

As I watched the movie, I did not find myself comparing it to the 1971 version at all. This adaptation is not so much a remake as an entirely different interpretation of the story, and it is fascinating in its own right and for its own reasons. It is also remarkably faithful to Roald Dahl's book, and because I had read the book just before the movie came out, I found myself thinking, 'oh, that part's just like the book' or 'I remember that from the book' numerous times. In fact, many lines were taken directly from the book.

I will admit that when I saw the trailers I thought, 'Hm. . .Johnny Depp seems awfully weird in this movie. . .' and I was a little worried, but leave it to Johnny to think outside the box and come up with a brilliant performance as Wonka himself. Little Charlie Bucket was just perfect- I liked him a lot more than the Charlie in the other film. The rest of the Bucket family was much more likable than in the other film too. And the other four children, Augustus, Veruca, Violet and Mike, were all wonderfully portrayed. They represented perfectly all the bratty children that exist in this world. A unique approach was taken towards creating the Oompa-Loompas, them being just one person, digitally copied. The fact that they were all completely identical did not bother me at all (although this could be because the actor who played them was in The Neverending Story, my favourite movie), and did not make them any less interesting. However, I will admit that their songs were a bit bizarre, but the lyrics were taken straight from the book.

Every single second of the movie seems to have been thought out with great care and therefore the overall look of the film is very polished, as though no expense was spared to make the film look perfect. The only two things that bothered me were the fact that the setting of Charlie's home-town was not clear. I think it was supposed to be England, but I was not always sure. The other thing is the including of Willy Wonka's father and flashbacks of Willy's past. That was definitely not in the book and I was at a loss to understand why it was put in. Oh well, at least it didn't take away from the fun of the movie. Speaking of fun, I was laughing out loud in the theater. It was all just so amusing and clever and wonderful. Please, do see it. Don't let the weirdness bother you. There will be something to laugh over, I assure you.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
do not ever watch this horrible film
10 July 2005
In the beginning, there was The Neverending Story. It is the best film ever made.

Then, there was The Neverending Story II. I'll vent my spleen over that mess later.

And then, there came this waste of film and effort. Hold on a minute while I go throw up.

While it is a clean, safe film in terms of subject matter, the third NES should never have been made. And I mean NEVER. The first two movies covered all the wondrous things within the original book, so I don't understand why this film was made at all. It is just cheesy, stupid, abysmal, and an absolute disgrace to the idea of The Neverending Story.

First of all, what's going on with this stepsister of Bastian's that has somehow appeared? Wrong, wrong. . . Then, what happened to good old Falkor? And most of all, where is Atreyu? If you are bold enough to see this film, that is the one thing you will distinctly notice if you've seen the other two- no Atreyu.The boy who played Bastian was not nearly as obnoxious as the actor from the second film, but he just doesn't hold a candle to the original actor, Barret Oliver.

I have only seen this movie once, because I was informed of how awful it was, and just had to see for myself. It was a waste of my precious time. I hardly remember the plot line or anything important like that because it just didn't stick with me. One gets the impression that this was made as a sort of kid/family-friendly approach to The Neverending Story, because it is just so simplistic, and sacrifices the charm of the original characters and settings for the sake of being funny and entertaining. But trust me, it is NOT funny and it is NOT entertaining. Any NES fan worth their salt would be appalled by this film. If however you are not familiar with the Neverending Story, see the original 1984 movie and read the book and be contented with that.

Do not subject yourself to the torturous nightmare that is the Neverending Story 3, I implore you.

As for a star rating out of ten, I give this film nothing. Nil. Zip. Nichts.
56 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
94 minutes of neverending inspiration and perfection
9 July 2005
Ah. . .The Neverending Story. . .what a perfectly extraordinary film. The Neverending Story is my most favorite movie ever. I first saw it four years ago (2001), and that day is now much honoured. The NES changed my life- I know it sounds cliché but it's true. I shall not divulge into that however; I shall proceed to sing the praises of this fine fantastic film. I hope I don't leave anything out. . . The acting is very good- I've heard numerous claims to the contrary but I think it is just spot-on. No one but Noah Hathaway could have played Atreyu, Barret Oliver is the only true Bastian, and Tami Stronach is my hero as the ethereal, graceful Childlike Empress. The gnomes Engywook and Urgl are just wonderful also. All the characters make up a splendid ensemble. The music is perfect, the sets and locations are so unique (TNES is NOT generic fantasy), and the basic idea of the story is pure genius. The concept of The Neverending Story is so different and outside-the-box, yet universal and timeless and oh so relevant. It is all about the power and scope of one's imagination and how important it can be to just lose yourself in a story in order to fuel that imagination. The theme song also breaks the mold and perfectly captures the essence of the film. I defy the irksome comments made about this film. Falkor does NOT look like a dog, he is a luckdragon. The acting is NOT cheesy, and of COURSE the movie has to end at SOME point (I mean really, don't take 'neverending' so literally). If you've read the original book by Micheal Ende, you may feel that the NES is a bit too short. That's its only fault, really. Just a bit short. . .anyway, I encourage everyone to see this brilliant movie. 12 stars out of 10.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed