Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Falls just short of "so bad it's good"
21 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Let's put aside the fact that it doesn't follow the original message of the story or, you know, the story itself. It can be forgiven for that, as well as asinine elements like Milady surviving and the Musketeers deciding that the best way to forestall a war between France and England was to blow up the Duke of Buckingham's house. The high production value adds it's part to make it at least visually interesting. The continued appearance of familiar faces will make you say "oh, it's so-and-so", which is just about the most fun you'll have all movie.

The fatal flaw of this film is, without a doubt, the script. It is so cliché and modernized that I amused myself by guessing what line would come next and was right an unnerving amount of the time. The jokes all fell flat, the Mission Impossible style of action made me want to cry, and it was clear that the actors were rushing their way through the lines as quickly as possible to collect their money. It made me smile that someone actually got paid to write this script, and then whoever played Constance got paid to look like she was reading off of cue cards every time she was on screen.

Let's talk about the actors, none of whom are French or bothered to try for a French accent. Watching the good guys was like watching paint dry. The Musketeers, who are all good actors, looked bored to tears, and while that might have worked for a time due to the rut their characters are in, it soon became clear that Matthew MacFayden's brain was taking a nap while he let his deep vocal chords say the lines, hoping the baritone would cover the necessary bases. Luke Evans did his hair in a mirror and knew that that would be enough to keep girls watching, so he didn't even bother. Ray Stevenson had the most charisma, and so predictably got the least screen time. Logan Lerman tried, but seemed more like he needed to go back to high school than one of the greatest swordsmen in France. I already discussed whatever Constance was supposed to me. A mannequin, perhaps. It seemed that the King and Queen had the only real character and heart in the entire film, which is unfortunate because she is barely in it and he is a dunce.

Oh also there is a character who is supposed to be comic relief played by James Corden.

Casting Oscar winners and fan favorite as villains almost guaranteed a complete overshadowing of the heroes, though this didn't make them exponentially more interesting. Christoph Waltz is good enough that he would have to try to fail, but he clearly regretted buying whatever it was that necessitated the salary of this movie. Milla Jovovich pretty much just did what she does every movie, which is not always a plus. Mads Mikkelsen gets a shout out for at least trying to do a good job despite awful lines and zero character development, and per the usual Mads, succeeding very well. At least he looked cool and managed to deliver his lines with a straight face and a certain amount of menace. I do feel that he broke character at the time of his ridiculous death, where I could have sworn that he was visibly relieved at finally being able to leave this travesty of a film. Orlando Bloom alone gets full stars as being the only person, including the audience, having any fun, and having a lot of it.

Bottom line is, unless you need a really good laugh, this is all Redbox has to offer or you're a big enough Bloom or Mikkelsen fan that you want to see them as another cool minor character, skip this one.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wanted (2008)
5/10
Mixed up
5 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
From the reviews on here I was expecting nothing more than a 2 star film, so I was pleasantly surprised that I didn't completely want to turn it off (though I did consider doing so about a third of the way through). The acting was fine, the action fine, the concept weird enough to keep me intrigued and the twist (while obvious) still took the movie in a better direction than the one it had been going in.

My main problems with this film was that parts of it just didn't jive. The first two thirds are a very Fight Club-esque story of a loser escaping his loserly life, complete with voice over narration. It's darkly funny and delightfully (if often over the toply) ridiculous. The final third, however, suddenly loses nearly all humor and becomes a violent revenge tale that took me a bit out of the movie, and the ending was silly, which takes me to the second blending issue:

For me, at least, the most sympathetic character was by far the father/Cross. He's stuck in a life where he can't be with his son (who he clearly loves and has watched grow up) and wants nothing more than for that son to NOT follow in his footsteps and have a "normal" life. Then it turns out his whole career is a lie and he spends his final days trying to protect his kid from that world and that fate. I didn't get it. Wesley should be honoring that sacrifice, not abusing it with quippy little "what the f*** are you doing with your life?" endings that made me think...well, I'm living a normal life with a normal family that your dad, the best person in this film, would be proud of. Nice try honoring his memory, Wes. I wasn't sure if the film was trying to convey that Wesley's dad was wrong or that Wesley is a special case, even though not being a part of the fraternity, new or otherwise, was pretty much his dying wish. Oh well, it wasn't the worst couple of hours I've spent.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's about the message, not the accuracy
25 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is neither as amazing or terrible as everyone seems to make it out to be.

Let's talk what stinks about this movie. The editing, for one, and huge chunks of the script for another. Macy's strange wife-vision scenes are not only badly placed, they're useless. Cutting them out of the movie and establishing a better relationship between the two at the beginning might have been a wiser choice, if they were necessary at all.

As far as realistic goes, this is no Das Boot. If it went for historically accurate U-Boat operations, it's not awful but it is far from perfect. The German crew does speak German, which is refreshing. Some of the line delivery from more minor actors was off. The music is a little cheesy, and I had a personal gripe with the large Nazi flag hanging behind the second German boat in the climax, as if to say "these Germans are the BAD Germans. It's okay if they die." It was a little heavy handed for a movie that's about...

...cooperation between enemies. Let's talk what's good about this movie, and that's the message. As much as I love films like Saving Private Ryan, little irks me more in war movies than the the Americans portrayed as the gung-ho patriotic heroes and all Germans as evil redshirts who can't hit anything with their guns and just wait around to be slaughtered. Though they do their civic duty and begin as the "bad guys", In Enemy Hands, much like films such as War Horse and Stalingrad (1993), portrays them as human. The German crew in this film are made up of both loyal sympathizers to the German cause who will go so far as mutiny to kill the Americans that they hate, and men like the Captain who are just tired of the war and want to get everyone home safe at the end of the day. Perhaps the most realistic is Ludwig, who dislikes and distrusts the Americans but follows his Captain's orders to the letter, is reluctant to fire on his countrymen but in the end saves lives. It is a realistic portrayal of men, not a bunch of swastika-painted monsters who want to make their sausage with Allied children. And through the trials, treason and mistrust, both crews learn that the others are men, as well, and THAT is what is great about this film. It might be fictional, but it is a story that I wish had happened during WW II and indeed, I am sure, at least began to happen in many parts of the world. It's important for people to see films like this at least once so that they don't linger under the impression that every German in the war was a Hitler clone.

As far as acting goes, don't believe what everyone else complains about. Scott Caan was the weakest of the leads but he wasn't distractedly bad, and he wasn't in it for too long. Til Schweiger didn't have to do much to look imposing and Captain-y, and he's easy on the eyes for the lady viewers. Macy was very good in a unconventional role, a normal looking fellow among a rather good looking lot of sailors. Thomas Kretschmann will always be the standout of whatever film he is in, managing to convey a plethora of emotions without Hollywooding it up for the camera. It's worth a watch for his performance alone, and it was good to see him finally survive.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed