"The Island of Dr. Moreau" 1977 PG 1h 39m
Disturbing subject matter, but a fair movie. I never liked Michael York, in his day. Thought he was pompous, overly dramatic, and gay. But surprisingly to me, he actually fits in this movie quite well. All the actors were good, but all of them were also a little stiff.
I would single out Barbara Carrera. Obviously she is the T&A; and I give her a 9 for that. But, she isn't a half bad actress. I kinda like the stuff she has done over the years.
I hate comparing adaptations and steenking books. I have never read the book, and I don't care. I am a movie buff. This 1997 version is a classic in it's own right. I remember it being widely discussed in 1977. It was quite the topic of conversation, for it's subject matter. I know. I was there.
I was also there when the '66 one came out, and when the '96 one came out. The '66 one caused quite the furor, also. But, we're not here to review those.
All aspects of the cinematography of '77 are excellent. The director strives to give it that feeling of the correct setting. The sets are costumes are well done, and period specific. Even the music harks back to the turn of the century. The photography is pretty good for 1977. If I was the King of Hollywood, back in '77, I would have insisted they adjust the screenplay. It seems like it stumbles along.
And guess what? Noflicks doesn't carry it. But, you can watch it free on YouTube!
The Bushwacker 12/31/2021.
Disturbing subject matter, but a fair movie. I never liked Michael York, in his day. Thought he was pompous, overly dramatic, and gay. But surprisingly to me, he actually fits in this movie quite well. All the actors were good, but all of them were also a little stiff.
I would single out Barbara Carrera. Obviously she is the T&A; and I give her a 9 for that. But, she isn't a half bad actress. I kinda like the stuff she has done over the years.
I hate comparing adaptations and steenking books. I have never read the book, and I don't care. I am a movie buff. This 1997 version is a classic in it's own right. I remember it being widely discussed in 1977. It was quite the topic of conversation, for it's subject matter. I know. I was there.
I was also there when the '66 one came out, and when the '96 one came out. The '66 one caused quite the furor, also. But, we're not here to review those.
All aspects of the cinematography of '77 are excellent. The director strives to give it that feeling of the correct setting. The sets are costumes are well done, and period specific. Even the music harks back to the turn of the century. The photography is pretty good for 1977. If I was the King of Hollywood, back in '77, I would have insisted they adjust the screenplay. It seems like it stumbles along.
And guess what? Noflicks doesn't carry it. But, you can watch it free on YouTube!
The Bushwacker 12/31/2021.
Tell Your Friends