So, keeping dolphins in captivity, slaughtering dolphins, eating dolphins, hunting dolphins, and capturing wild dolphins is totally unethical, inhumane, and immoral... but captive cows, pigs, sheep, lions, tigers, bears (oh my!), chickens, monkeys, ducks, geese, llamas, goats, camels, horses, rabbits, deer, fish, wolves, snakes, turtles, donkeys, chimps, tapirs, gorillas, koalas, kangaroos, mice, rats, possums, cats, and dogs are all A-OK, huh?
Hmmm....
The self-righteous, performative moral indignation in this review section, from people who virtually all will (exactly like myself) happily eat intelligent, social, empathetic animals like pigs and cows, and who (again, like myself) have no problem with intelligent, wild animals captive in zoos, and (like myself) probably have intelligent, social animals captive in their own homes (cats, dogs, and other pets), is goddam hilarious.
For thousands and thousands of years, literally EVERY culture routinely hunted and ate wild animals, the way the Japanese hunt dolphins and whales, today. And even just a single century ago, I'll bet money that YOUR nation, dear reader, was slaughtering whales on an industrial scale, and that YOUR great-grandparents were fueling that industry, by lighting their homes with lamps burning whale-oil... so what is Japan's great crime here, specifically? Doing EXACTLY what every other developed nation did, but being a few decades behind the trend? Sticking to their own values, rather than caving in to international virtue-police, who try to puff up their own ego, by demanding that everyone else adhere to THEIR arbitrary moral standards?
I love animals as much as the next person- In the past year, I've spent considerably more money on vet bills for my elderly, cancer-riddled cat, than I have on my own healthcare. And I'm as repulsed at needless cruelty against animals, as everyone else is. But I'm also a pragmatist, and a realist, and someone with little tolerance for hypocrisy; Cordoning off one single species as being "immoral" to kill (in broadly comparable conditions to those under which deer, pigs, cows, etc are killed), just because they're cute, and look fun and happy on-camera, and because we grew up watching 'Flipper', while we happily scoff down bacon, pork and ham from pigs that are EQUALLY INTELLIGENT, is just arbitrary, hypocritical, irrational, emotion-driven nonsense.
(And I eat bacon too, btw. I'm not being some preachy vegan- I'm saying that we shouldn't break our arms, from patting ourselves on the back, for how enthusiastically we threw those stones, from here in our giant, glass house...)
This movie is a study in empty self-congratulation, and in the power of emotional manipulation, over rationality- Dolphins (of the species discussed in The Cove; primarily Bottlenose) ARE NOT endangered. Generally, cetaceans have been booming, for decades. Many of the larger whale species WERE threatened... 50 to 100 years ago, when the effects of the international whaling industry of the 1800s were still being felt... But the crude oil rush if the 1900s made whale-oil obsolete, and since then, 90% of cetacean species have been booming- Which begs the question of "Wait... specifically WHY do we have all these special laws and groups, protecting whales, when the whales are doing fine?"
And there IS a pretty clear answer to that question- The reason is, that the birth of the modern environmentalist/animal rights movement was in the early 70s- the "hippy" era, which was the culture this movement grew out of. And in the hippy/psychadelic scene, there was a pretty big fad for using whalesong in music, and for theories about cetaceans being psychic (and even experiments giving dolphins LSD, and having sex with human women, to coax out their "psychic powers"... I swear I'm not even making that up. The 70s were pretty wild...)- Basically, the hippy scene ALREADY revered whales and dolphins, so we got "SAVE THE WHALES" bumper-stickers, and dolphins/whales were used as a symbol for endangered animals... even though they'd ALREADY recovered from being endangered-
And to this day, that (completely false) cultural association between whales, and the urgent need for protection from extinction, still stands- People will spend literally hundreds of millions of dollars, on "saving" animals that haven't been threatened for a century.
So, of the reason we're meant to care about dolphins is environmental, then Yayyy!!! The problem is solved because they're not even close to be threatened, so the Japanese can safely harvest them, right?
Or, if the reason we're meant to care is ethical, because dolphins are so clever, and smart, and empathetic, well then pigs and cows are COMPARABLY smart and social and empathetic to dolphins- So me, you, and everyone else who isn't vegan, is EXACTLY as guilty as those evil, cruel Japanese men, slaughtering those poor dolphins....
So which is it? The problem that was solved 50 years ago, making the dolphin-killing A-OK? Or the problem where we're exactly as guilty as the Japanese, which would require YOU to change YOUR OWN behaviour, before you start waggling your finger at the Japanese, as if you're blameless?
Or... maybe we could just ACCEPT that the Japanese hunt dolphins, the same way that people in the US and Canada hunt bear, and Australians hunt Crocodiles, and people the world over 'hunt' fish- all on a far, far greater scale than the Japanese dolphin-killing? Because to me, it looks like that's the only rational, non-hypocritical option...
(Production-wise, The Cove is a competent-enough documentary, and 'gonzo' element of the film-makers getting directly involved in the story, is fairly well-done. But let's be real; This movie is about the supposed "ethical/enviromental issues", not the film-making)
2 out of 6 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends