Change Your Image
Badmoviessuck
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
The Karate Kid Part II (1986)
Awful Sequel
Karate kid 2 is a mediocre movie.
SIMILARITY
Karate kid 2 is basically the first Karate kid but in Japan.
Daniel has a crush on a girl but gets bullied by a gang and in the end he has to fight to prove his worthiness and stop getting bullied.
They manage to have different elements in the movie to differentiate a little bit from the first movie but they have to much similarities so the sequel just becomes a rehash of the first one.
ROMANCE
I don't know why they needed to give Daniel another girl to fall in love with.
They just made a worse version of Ali and Daniels relationship.
There is no conflict and no chemistry within the relationship to make it believable that they are together.
And I have a game theory that Daniel and Ali have a very toxic relationship and that drives Daniel to cheat on her with The japanease love interest.
Cause it was never confirmed that they were broken up and in the beginning of the movie and when Daniels car was all busted up he talked about how annoying Ali is which is a sign that they are in bad terms.
VILLAIN
Sato is an meh villain.
The redemption arc they gave him was rushed but overall there was nothing that happened I this movie that made me really hate him.
DANIEL
I hate how helpless Daniel is when he fights Chozen and his men.
I thought after the first Karate kid he wouldn't be this helpless kid anymore (that was kinda his arc during that movie) but nope he is still helpless and gets beat up very easily which annoyed the hell out of me
But then in the final act when he fights Chozen he conveinetely manages to fight him fairly well (which he never managed to do before that) and the final fight between Danile and Chozen is a worse version of the fight Daniel and Johnny had in the first movie.
VERDICT
Did not like Karate kid 2 it was a poor movie.
4/10
The Karate Kid (1984)
Myaji
Karate kid is a good movie.
It's nothing amazing but it's good enough to get an 8/10.
CHARACETRS
Daniel is a decent character.
He starts of as a kid who gets bullied and learns to be good at karate and learning valuable lessons from Myagi.
What they did with Myagi was good.
They made him a fun guy while giving him some depth to make him more likeable and they executed that really well.
RELATIONSHIP
The relationship was mediocre.
It went pretty well at the beginning but in the end it started to lose sense.
When Daniel gets the new car and drives to Ali Ali gets made for no reason and then that springs off into Daniel being poor and Ali being rich and then that springs off to Lawrence kissing Ali against her will which makes the conversation clunky cause we don't know what even started the conflict since Ali was mad at Daniel for no reason.
DIFFERENCE
The noticeable difference in Karate kid and Karate kid (2010) is that the pacing is very different.
karate kid (2010) uses slow pacing for more dramatic effect but Karate kid dosent do that.
Karate kid is a very fast paced movie.
I believe that Karate kid (2010) handles pacing a tiny bit better than Karate kid since they manage to have more dramatic scenes which makes the movie better but the slow pace also means that the movie drags most of the time and it isn't the same for Karate kid.
VERDICT
Solid movie.
I really want to watch Cobra Kai
Kung Fu Panda 2 (2011)
KADUSH! 2 ELECTRIC BOOGALO
Kung fu panda 2 is a better made movie than Kung fu panda.
CHARACTER
Po gets way more development in this movie than in the last movie.
In this movie he goes through self discovery not knowing who he is and were he came from but manages to pull himself together and become a more stronger man afterwards.
VILLAIN
Shen was also a pretty good villain.
He wasn't as good as Tai Lung but they manage to do the same with him as they did to Tau lung to make him an acceptable villain.
He dosent show his strength but he manages to be a good plot device for Pos development and he has a bit of a backstory himself to give him a little bit more depth.
ACTION
The action was yet again amazing and awesomely choreographed.
The different shots and creative techniques they use will definitely get you hooked.
VERDICT
Awesome movie and really a worthy sequel.
I really wonder what they will do in Kung fu panda 3
Kung Fu Panda (2008)
KADUSH!
Kung fu panda is a enjoyable movie.
CHARACTERS
Po is a decent character.
He goes trough a decent character arc.
He is first a man who is a fan of the furious five but then gets choosen to be a dragon warrior. He believes that he isn't the Dragon warrior and dosent fit in until something happens that makes him believe that he is the Dragon warrior and he saves the day.
Shifu is also a good character with a little development.
After Oogway died he Was the guy who needs to take the mantel and lead his students to become the greatest Dragon warriors they can be. He dosent believe in Po first but he felt obligated to lead him the right way when Oogway died and he learned an important lesson.
The side characters were alright.
VILLAIN
Tai Lung was actually a good villain.
He is cool and they managed to set up how much of a threat he is to the Heroes and he has an alright backstory that gives the villain a tiny bit of depth.
ACTION
The action is pretty amazing.
How they choreographed the action scenes and the different camera movements to make us really see and grasp the action is all well.
VERDICT
It's a pretty good movie 8/10
The Hunger Games (2012)
The battle royale before BATTLE ROYALE!!!!!!
The movie is decent.
CHARACTER
Katniss is a decent enough character.
She does her part in the movie but her as a character is pretty weak.
There is no depth nor development to her which makes her a pretty weak character.
Peetah is also an alright character, you get more depth with him than Katniss but it's pretty short and don't really amount to anything really important to the movie.
I just want to say this.
Haymitch was supposed to give Katniss and Peetah tips to get sponsors but he refuses cause he is drunk and he thinks it's pointless but then Haymitch later gives advice on how to get more sponsors that's a bit of a contradiction but ok.
Rue is also an alright character even though things got a bit rushed with her they managed to finish her story in a satisfying way
WORLDBUILDING
The worldbuilding is splendid and they really manage to capture the tone of the world by just a few scenes.
The contrast with the districts and Panem really expands the world and the political themes of the story to enrichen the world really males you hooked but I would like to see more of the other people's reactions to hunger games and how they are affected by 8t a little bit more in detail but other than that it did its job well.
VERDICT
The movie has problems (which are nitpicks) but other than that it's a decent movie and I would give it a 7/10
Men in Black II (2002)
What an Oofie sequel
MiB 2 isn't as bad as other people say but it's not that good either.
CHARACTERS
I actually think that J is a better character in this movie than in the last movie.
For the first they developed him so that he is a professional good agent in MiB 2 and they also made him more humane by making him not whipe the memory of Laura giving him a little development.
K isn't as good though.
They could have focused on developed the plot about K getting his memory whiped but they just made that a conflict and it got easily resolved.
VILLAIN
The villain is pretty boring.
She has a basic motivation similar motivation for the Villain in MiB 2 but the difference is that the one in the first movie was actually funny but she is just pretty bland.
COMEDY
The comedy was lacklustre in this one.
A few repeated jokes a few new unfunny ones it didn't make me laugh that much.
VERDICT
I kinda get why people don't like this movie.
It's similar to the first one and it has some holes in logic for example.
1. People saw an alien in the first scene of the movie but they didn't memory whipped and even if they did it would be impossible for all of them to be memory whipped (they solved it later but even that's stupid).
2. Why didn't the citizen react scared to what was just happening.
3. They whipped agent T's memory but isn't that suit exclusive to MiB
4. How did James know how many people were in the subway is he some super genius cause he has done some stupid stuff.
5. The flushing system is stupid and it will make people pay attention and sceptical of what's actually going on.
6. K got his memory back but he needed to know how to fight of the aliens even if he worked on MiB longer than J.
7. They didn't care to solve the problem with big worm staying on the subway they just let him kill civilians.
8. If they whipe the whole cities memory won't memory whipe some people from the MiB.
That's actually alot of holes in logic, you know what? MiB is pretty bad so I'll give it a 4/10.
Men in Black (1997)
It was cool
Men in Black was good but I didn't enjoy it as much as other people did.
COMEDY
The comedy was alright.
It had some smart jokes here and there but it wasn't really anything that would make me die laughing at.
CHARACTERS
The real reason to why I didn't enjoy it asmuch as others was cause of the characters.
it's interesting how they didn't give these characters much character depth or development and people still love this movie so I asked a question to myself "Why do people think that this movie is good" And I found three answers to that question.
1. The humor
2. The dialogue
3. The world building
I will go through two of those answers (cause I already went through the humor) in a bit but first I will go through the characters of this movie.
Edward isn't a good protagonist and I will stand by that.
Edward gets good lines that are funny and make me chuckle or laugh but other than that he is just a character with no depth which weirdly enough made me more interested in him for some reason.
And I really think the point of the protagonist isn't to give him any depth I really think the point of this movie isn't even about the characters.
Edward joins MiB cause he wants to, there is no other reason than that. We don't anything about his family life we know very little about his background.
But I really wanna know the answer to why Agent K whipped Edwards memory cause he was gonna get Edward to join MiB anyway.
Agent K was decent he had really good lines and he got some character development which was executed really well in the end.
DIALOGUE
Know the reason why people like this movie so much is cause of the engaging dialogue.
The dialogue is related to the humor which makes the dialogue engaging and funny.
Even I was engaged in the dialogue.
For example when Agent K and Edward talked at the bench about MiB, really interesting thoughts were conveyed in that small scene about what Humans think they know and that us one of the examples of why people loved the movie so much.
WORLDBUILDING
When we go through the plot of this movie the writers made so that we saw how the world works with aliens and humans on MiB which made the world more alive.
Examples are when an alien was gonna be born or how MiB works when it comes to people knowing that aliens exist.
Moments like that makes the world more lively.
VERDICT
I fought MiB was good but I didn't like it that
much so I will give it 7/10
Pacific Rim (2013)
Live action Darling in the franXX
Pacific Rim is good but not great.
CHARACTERS
The reason this movie is good is because of the characters, but it's also a reason for why it's not great.
Raleigh is a pretty bland protagonist that has a conflict which never ever gets explored and gets ignored through out the movie which makes him really bland and the acting of that protagonist isn't really that amazing either.
Mako is the only one who is even a decent character cause they manage to give her conflict and a backstory in a subtle way which gives the viewer enough information to know what's going on with her character but also wanting more from her backstory (they showed that greatly with the scene of her as a kid) and doing that they can actually make sequels, novels, comics etc explaining her backstory so they can get extra cash by expanding the lore of Pacific rim (which they did).
But how they finished mako's character arc was bad.
When they used the gipsy (I think) for the first time it didn't go well for mako and mako couldn't control the gipsy with Raleigh which would be a good way to develop her character but they just ignore and for the second time the use gipsy they did very well ignoring the conflict that was set up.
Chuc Hansen is a very bad character.
The reason I bring him up is cause they rushed his character arc and executed it very poorly.
They broke the rule with show don't tell and Stacker just said every problem Chuc Hansen had which could potentially be used to develop Hansen. One of those problems were daddy issues which the movie never shown that Chuc had so we never knew it until Stacker said it.
CGI
the CGI was really good and they manage to blend in the location the robot and the Kaiju really well.
ACTION
The action was bland it was basically a robot hitting a monster in the most blandest way possible.
It was just a bunch of basic moves you see used in many movies.
And the weird thing is that when Raleigh was fighting Makos candidates the fighting style there is very very different from what we see in the movie.
In real life they use a certain fighting style that's pretty well choreographed but when they fight in the robot that fighting style gets thrown out the window and they just use basic fighting techniques.
FINAL ACT
The final act was great and put me on edge managing to finalize a bit of Makos arc and they manage to set the stakes pretty high which is a good feat cause this movie has those "the end of the world" stakes that can often go bad.
VERDICT
I heard there was a sequel to this movie which I wonder how that's even possible since they won and they prevented the Kaiju from arriving in their world.
They will probably do a bs explanation to why the Kaiju can still arrive at their world.
6/10 it's fun.
Avengers: Infinity War (2018)
Should have gone for the head
Avengers infinity war is great.
I will keep it short cause the reasons why I like this movie people have already said in a better way than I could ever do
CHARACTERS
Thanos is the best villain in the entire MCU and a great protagonist.
We can understand his goal for wanting to whipe out half of the people In this galaxy and there is alot of sacrifice conflict and sympathy for what he is doing to achieve this goal which makes his motivation more personal.
He kills Gamora so that he could succeed in his goal to get an infinity stone and that makes him suffer.
His planet got destroyed cause of over population and Gamoras planet became great because of Thanos whipping out half of the people in that planet and that makes us understand Thanos even more.
If he could have saved people by killing half of the population in that planet why can't he do the same everywhere else?
And that's what makes his motivation so great. Understandable but flawed.
He could have also used his mighty power (I.e. when he gets all the infinity stones) to give resources to people so there was no need to kill of half of the people in the galaxy but because he is a flawed person he dosent see that (and his character gets better in endgame) he is an imperfect character with great development depth and arc and the fact that he won makes the movie even better when you see the last scene of him in his farm.
OTHER STUFF
The structure was really good and everyone acted in character and I think Peter Quill and Tony stark were the best characters of the heroes who were fighting Thanos.
Peter Quill being emotional over the conflict of Gamora and that makes him act irrational.
And Tony stark dealing Great consequences for what he has done (and it gets better in endgame) And the action is really amazing specially in the Titan fighting scene were every thing was so well choreographed. this movie is one of the best MCU movies.
VERDICT
This movie is really good.
Avengers: Endgame (2019)
The Best MCU movie
CHARACTERS
Avengers end game is the best MCU movie to ever be created imo.
Some of the characters (like Tony and Rogers) were greatly developed
Ronin went from something terrible happening to him and that changed him as a person and after he decided to have hope another conflict ensued on him.
Ronin was developed good but they could have done way more.
Like him being easily convinced to save everyone was not that cool and he really should have had more conflict to make him a better character.
Tony has had the greatest character arc in this whole entire Franchise.
Going to not caring about lives to trying to save every single one of them and his death is great.
Steve Rogers the virtuous guy who has gone through alot decided on a decision that changed him and made him learn. And him lifting the hammer was amazing.
Heck even Nebula had a great character arc.
She went from trying to kill Gotg to actually trying to save the world and it's pretty compelling actually
Thor is comedy gold but the character arc he had could have been way better but it wasn't
Hulk is also pretty funny but he never got used that much.
Captain Marvel felt a bit like a Deus ex machine and it got pretty annoying but I'm glad she wasn't in the movie that much.
VILLAIN
Thanos was actually a good villain as well.
He wanted to make half of the people disappear but he knew that it wouldn't work so he changed his ideology to destroy and rebuild and it shows how greatly compelling he is and he is one of the greatest MCU villains.
TIMELINE
The timeline was handled recentely but I have one question I just want to be answerd cause it makes me really confused.
So after the Thanos snap the movie is played in the year 2023 and then everyone that died in 2018 comes back alive in 2023.
I can understand that they look the same age as when they died in the movie but my problem is shouldn't Ned and Peter be out of high school since Peter came back alive in the year 2023.
That's the only thing that confuses me when it comes to this movie and I want an answer. (I know the answer now but I won't delete this cause I want you guys to see my stupidity)
VERDICT
The ending was truly great and I th8nk the MCU should have just stopped at Endgame bit sadly 20 more movies has to be made.
But nothing I tell you will top endgame cause imo it feels like the most Marvel comicy movie out of all the 21 movies.
Doctor Strange (2016)
Got it from Inception
I really liked this movie actually.
CHARACTERS
Steven Strange is a well fleshed out character with a really good character arc.
We get to se him being an a hole to slowly developing into being a true hero.
You could say that the story is formulaic and all but i didn't really mind it that much (and yes it's a minor flaw that it's formulaic) and they managed to also make a few other characters interesting.
Ancient one is a interesting character.
I though she would be that flawless person that dies near the end of the movie but they showed that she has flaws and that nobody is perfect which is a great addition which strengthens the movie.
And the other guy with sword (i forgot his name) was also an interesting character who left Strange and Wong in the end which was an interesting scene.
VILLAIN
The villain was terrible one of the worst marvel villain to be ever created and that's why i gave this movie an 8/10 instead of a 9/10.
ACTION
I lacked how they had interesting areas to do the fight scenes even though they weren't that amazingly well choreographed.
FINAL ACT
The final act was underwhelming.
They had an interesting place to do an action scene but because of the mediocre choreography the action wasn't really that interesting and it ended pretty short.
VERDICT
I really like the movie.
FINAL WORD
I promised myself to watch as many marvel movies and review them so i will be prepared for endgame.
I'll probably watch.
Civil war.
Infinity war (i'll definetely watch that movie)
Ant man and the wasp
Gotg 2
Iron man 3 has no effect on the Mcu and noone cares about captain marvel but i will watch those two after endgame (if i manage to get a ticket for it)
Shazam! (2019)
Best DCEU movie
Shazam is pretty good actually.
CHARACTER
Billy Batson is a great protagonist with great development.
He starts of as this orphan who gets superpowers and use them for his own enjoyment but then learns what a real super hero is and uses his power for good.
This movie is about growing up the become a true hero its about what it means to be a hero and Billy Batson is learning that threw this movie.
There is not much I can say about this movie either than it's good it has good humor and good characters.
This movie is a must watch.
VILLAIN
The villain is meh they manage to set him up good but then later he just becomes bland.
FINAL ACT
The final act dragged for a bit and was a bit nonsensical like when all of the kids got the powers of Shazam and easily learned how to use their skills during a battle.
And a 9 year old managing to easily save lives is pretty stupid.
ONE MAJOR FLAW
Idk If this is an actual flaw or not but I think it is.
There is this whole Side plot about Freddy being Friends with Shazam but that whole Side plot could have easily been solved.
First you could actually see Freddys face during a recording of Shazam testing his powers and you could also hear his voice countless of times in the videos he shown.
So if Freddy just showed the videos of Shazam testing his powers then the side plot would have easily been solved.
VERDICT
This movie is really good nonetheless.
But I don't believe that DC will manage to continue producing good movies.
I hope they do but I don't believe that.
But who knows maybe I'm wrong.
Iron Man 2 (2010)
The disappointing sequel
Iron man 2 had potential to be great actually but there are problems with this movie that prevents it from being so good.
CHARACTER
How they handled Tony stark was great... in the beginning but then they rushed his character arc and executed it so poorly that Tony stark just becomes this meh character.
The scene were Tony fought Rhodes was great way to give Tony a character arc (but what happens after kinda dosen't make sense) but then the character arc gets completed by Nick fury coming out of nowhere and giving Tony stuff Howard Stark owned how convenient.
VILLAINS
The villains are really bad.
Justin Hammer is this buisness guy (like we haven't seen that before) and he dose what he dose because of money and nothing more.
Ivan does what he odse cause Stark killed his father or something and none of these characters get fleshed out and they have such an anti climactic end.
VERDICT
Iron man 2 isn't a bad movie but they make a bunch of missteps that makes Iron man 2 lose it's potential it had
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018)
All i could ask for
Spider-Man into the Spider-Verse is really good actually one of the if not the best Spider-Man movie.
It was funny exciting and a well written movie
CHARACTER
I think the reasons people like this movie is cause of Miles Morales.
He is a character not ready to take the responsebility as Spider-Man and not only that he has a goal to stop the world from ending cause he made a promis to Peter Parker.
I think he couldn't control his power cause Miles wasn't ready to be Spider-Man yet cause he didn't want to accept the responsibility and i think him turning invinsible is a subtle way to show that.
And Miles uncle and how they handled him is a great way to add conflict and it further develops Miles into being the person he is.
But i wanted them to explain why he did what he did.
He is a well developed character.
Peter Parker is a meh character with decent development that don't get as focused on.
He has problems with Mary Jane so he acts all negative but being with Miles makes him slowly change and he pulls himself together and becomes a better man being able to change who he is.
The rest of the Spidey people are underdeveloped.
VILLAIN
The villain was actually not bad.
King pin hade a motivation and he wasn't this all bland Villain.
Even though the backstory was messy you could still understand his motives and why he is doing this.
VERDICT
Great Movie to watch.
But where did the radioactive Spider come from?
Iron Man (2008)
The Start of a bunch of mediocrity (jk but Marvel is a bit overrated)
Iron man is really good.
CHARACTERS
Tony Stark is a great Character that develops through out the story.
The weapons he build caused consequences and Tony gets to see tha and that sparks a change to do better and improve himself.
DIALOGUE
The dialogue is sharp managing to show the personality of Tony and they manage to have witty lines.
VILLAIN
The villain is bland and he could have been better.
and how did those guys manage to rebuild Mark 1 when it has been shown that they don't know how to build things and rely on others to do it for them (e.g. their weapons are all from Stark industries and they captured Tony stark so he could make Jericho).
Anyways the Villain in this movie is just this bland buisnessman who is money hungry.
VERDICT
Great movie
Man of Steel (2013)
SuperBland
This movie was not that great.
BEGINNING
It started out really bad with generic lame dialogue and action with no emotion to it, piss poor acting and a generic af score.
CHARACTER
At least they tried to make Clark kent a good character but they failed.
I would believe that the Theme of this movie is purpose.
What's Clark kent's purpose in this world but they executed that Theme really poorly.
They show flashbacks of Clark kent having conflict of who he is and that develops Clark kent into becoming a pretty interesting character but they threw all that out of the window cause they needed Big CGI action for an hour straight.
Clark finds his purpose because he conveniently and without explanation worked at a place with Lois Lane and found a ship or a place that's from Krypton.
His dad arrives and explains his purpose and Clark kent's development is over.
It's over in the 40 minute mark and the rest is bland and boring action.
ACTION
The action has no stakes in it.
It's basically Super man has to save the world.
Which is high stakes really early in the first DCEU movie and the first Superman movie in the DCEU.
The stakes dosen't build up it just happen out of the blue (maybe if they didn't have an hour of action then they could have build up the stakes of this movie)
RELATIONSHIP
Lois Lane is a really bland character but the relationship with Clark is really terrible.
First she revealed that there was a being more powerful than man which risks the livelyhood of Clark kent but then Cöark being as virtuos as he is forgives her and makes love with her.
And the kissing scene when they destroyed that big thing destroying the city i would have cut that out cause i believe that the movie would be a bit better if that wasn't there cause they have no reason to love each other.
VILLAIN
The villain is not that good.
His motivations are understandable but he is so generic that he becomes a bad villain.
And Clark killing Zod was stupid the family had room to escape but they didn't escape and Super man could have made so that Zod didn't shoot at the family.
VERDICT
This movie is not good at all and is just another failure.
Guardians of the Galaxy (2014)
Bring back James gunn
This is a solid movie.
CHARACTERS
All the characters are fairly well setup.
Peter quill is a great character who has a fair amount of depth and a character that could get explored way more in the next movies.
Rocket Racoon is also a good character and they put some care into setting up his backstory and giving him some depth into his character.
Draxx is a meh character.
He has a basic Background story and he gets a mediocre character arc.
Gamora is fine and the manage to set up and develop her pretty good.
Groot isn't anything special but his death scene was a pretty touching moment.
They manage to set up and give fair character arc to all of these people and i hope that they improve on that in the sequel cause i felt that the characters weren't as strongly handled as i hoped they would be.
VILLAIN
The villain is just nonsensical and stupid.
He has a weak motivation and i don't know how he rose to power.
I mean how could he have thought that it was a smart idea to try to kill Thanos the guy who managed to do everything the Guardians of the Galaxy were fighting against the guy who could defeat Hulk using the power stone (and Hulk is really strong) i just don't like this villain.
SOUND
I have never ever critiqued Sound when it comes to music cause i'm not good that doing it but i will tell you the music in Gotg is great.
Using old school music to convey a certain emotion or theme and when they don't use old school music it's still great and manage to execute the tone it's trying to convey expertely.
CGI
The cgi is amazing and it manages to set the tone for the enviorment and through visuals they manage to show the state and tone of the planets which is always good when you make a movie with a big world that needs worldbuilding.
And btw there are alot of humans in those galaxies shouldn't it be more aliens or strange creatures you know to diversify the world so that it dosen't feel to bland
VERDICT
Solid movie but could have been better with stronger developed characters and a better villain.
Spider-Man 3 (2007)
Good riddance
It isn't that bad but it isn't that good either it's just meh.
CHARACTERS
Peter Parker in the beggining was the character we all loved and they were trying to give him something to make him develop which was good but his character arc was a mess.
He becomes Edgy Peter parker for a few seconds reverts back because Aunt May said some stuff reverts back again after what Harry did and then he starts to dance and then it becomes a short pointless petty love triangle in that one scene were Peter slaps MJ and then he reverts back again.
They are trying to convey this one Theme but it's such a mess that they don't manage to execute it well enough.
Harry was an alright character who was a bit weird.
He lost his memory and regained it after looking at a picture of Norman Osborn (which is stupid but fine) he becomes this "intimidating" villain who want's Mary Jane to do something that ever gets further executed.
He wantäs MJ to brake up with Pete and then he admits to Pete that it was him who made that plan and it was never explained what the purpose of the plan was.
And Bernard or Bernie whatever his name was he should have said that Norman killed himself a long time ago and how the hell did he know that?
You could have said that Spider-Man told the cops but then Harry would know so it's only Spider-Man and this Butler who knows about the death of Norman and the Butler wasn't even there (makes no sense).
VILLAIN
Venom was a terrible villain.
He should have been set-up for Spider-Man 4 cause Eddy Brock is there doing shady stuff later want's to kill Peter Parker and then becomes Venom in a stupid way.
If he knew that stuff was falling down (cause symbiote was falling on his jacket) he would have moved but nope he stood there and just let it all consume him.
And he want's to be bad cause he likes it which is a terrible motivation.
Sandman was an actually decent villain but he should have had way more screen time than he got.
VERDICT
It could have been great but sadly it's meh.
It had the right ideas but the problem was the execution of those ideas.
Spider-Man 2 (2004)
Pizza Time
Spider-Man too is so god damn great. and it is one of the greatest Spider man movie (Spider-Man 3 takes the spot lol jk).
CHARACTERS
Peter Parker is such a great protagonist and i sat for awhile to think why that was the case.
And it's because he is a so called underdog and we care about him so much.
First everything goes wrong in his life and he never seems to catch a break.
In that scene were Peter is going with JJ Jameson they setup as many subtle inconveniences as possible and then Harry stops being friends with Peter MJ dislikes Peter and she is getting married.
And when Peter saves that girl from the fire someone else died in that fire.
In the beggining he loses his job as said again the relationship with harry is at stake he disappointed MJ he loses his power he needs to pay rent and so much more.
And during all that struggle Peter never gives up and sucks it up instead of being a massive cry baby and we respect him more for that.
And all the resons the inconvenience happens is cause he is Spider-Man and with the loss of his Power he quits being Spider-Man not realising his responsibility until the end of the movie giving him a slight character development.
There is a better video explaining all this just search filmento Spider-Man.
Harry Osborn is an alright character as well and i like the conflict that is between them cause it adds to Harry's character.
MJ is just and alright Damsel in distress.
VILLAIN
The villain isn't that great but he has a cool character arc which i can respect.
ACTION
The action is so much fun and creative and it manages to set the stakes greatly.
First action scene between Spider-Man and Doc Ok set the stakes greatly by having Doc ok capturing Aunt May about to kill her.
The train fight scene did that as well by setting all the civilians in the train at risk for being killed.
VERDICT
Spider-Man 2 is a great film which manages to have a great protagonist
Spider-Man (2002)
Thanksgiving scene was a masterpiece lol
What a great movie this is.
It might corny and filled with the cheese but that's a part of what makes this movie so good.
CHARACTER
Toby maguire is an excellent Peter parker.
They gave him a short but great character arc in the beginning of the movie but even after that they managed to make Peter parker a great loving character and you can see that with the dialogue that is being provided.
For example the first time Mary Jane and Peter parker are having a real discussion and when Peter parker talks to Mary jane after graduating college all these dialogues show how great and loving of a character Peter is.
Harry is a decent character who is affected by his father not being there for him and it shows there is more to come.
Mary Jane was damsel in distress and was a pretty meh character.
VILLAIN
I would call Green goblin one of the greatest generic villains i have ever seen.
He might be generic but i still love him (Maybe cause of Willem Dafoe's performance) But at least he faced a challenge for Peter.
SPIDER-MAN
Toby maguire isn't that good of a Spider-Man cause he dosen't speak alot or make any jokes.
THANKSGIVING
The thanksgiving scene was amazing.
This were all gets bad.
Osborn figures out Peter's secret and Henry and MJ arent in such a good terms when Norman says some rude stuff.
It was a great set-up to the end and i know there is a greater reson to why this scene is so great but i cant come up with it (i'll edit this later when i do)
VERDICT
A quick review can't wait to watch the sequel.
Thor: Ragnarok (2017)
Dissapointment
Second time doing this review god damn it.
COMEDY
Comedy was alright it was the reason i gave it a 6/10 but it minimized the stakes of the movie which is not a big flaw i had cause even though they decreased the comedy so that the stakes were shown we still wouldn't care.
This movie would have been called one of the worst Thor movies if it wasn't funny to be honest.
CHARACTER
We had a strong female character who was bad cause she had no development and just wanted to join the team because it was really convenient and they didn't have any better way to make her join and when she is with them they instantly become good comrads.
Hulk was alright but they could have done more to make him better like showing how it is to be Hulk and the struggles or some stuff like that.
I like how they depowered Thor but they could have used that as character development.
Thor struggles with not having the hammer and then Odin comes and Thor developes and the movie might be better.
Loki is the best character not good but the best at least cause of the previous movies.
VILLAIN
Hela is a bad villain who had an alright motivation but was bland cause lack of screen time.
CGI
Cgi was bad just watch Thor vs Hulk to see the worst part of the cgi.
ACTION
Action was meh nothing special just a bunch of fast cuts to hide the fact that these people can't fight.
Jason bourne could do way better fast cuts like that cause those fast cuts were an artistic choice not a way to hide how the characters couldn't fight.
VERDICT
Overrated movie.
What happened to the guy who ruled the garbage planet they just ignored him.
Star Wars: Episode VIII - The Last Jedi (2017)
Ben swolo
One of the worst Star wars movies to exist very much.
I'll admit my Tfa review was wasted potential and this review will probably just repeat the same point as countless of others but i don't really care.
CHARACTERS
Luke is really bad.
He first says that he can't go against the first order cause they are too powerful even though he has defeated the empire.
One counter argument can be that he is old and grumpy and that what Ben solo did had an affect but then later R2D2 shows a clip of Leia saying "Obi wan you are our only hope" (fan pandering very much) and Luke immedieately changes his mind which is stupid.
Let me just go over to the training stuff which makes no sense
TRAINING
Rey trains to control the force but wait... isn't it established that you don't need to train to use the force but maybe they are training to make Rey's the force stronger but then is already really good at using the force and we never get to see her train for real we just get all this stuff happening in the temple cause it is convenient and later in the movie Rey can use the force really well.
CHARACTERS (CONT'D)
So Luke "trains" Rey and alll that stuff happens and Yoda out of nowhere explodes a place with Jedi stuff and luke dies being a bad character im done talking about luke
EXPLOSIONS
People don't die by explosions when they should.
DEATH
Leia should have died it's stupid that she didn't
Snoke shouldn't have died its stupid that he did.
CHARACTERS (CONT'D)
Rey was bland as ever and more Mary sue than ever.
Ok so her parents were nobodies then how did she learn how to use the melee weapon and how did she learn to fix ships and fly them so well maybe her parents new about ships i didnt listen that well (i'll edit this review if im right or wrong) and she could use the force extremely good making her training pointless.
Finn was bad and bland and Rose was just wasted they should have cut the scene with Paige.
Kylo Ren was the best part and his conflict with Luke and the dark side was cool but they expo dumped his back story.
and they never explain why Rey and Kylo have connection but maybe next movie
VERDICT
I think this was all i wanted to say but this movie is bad.
Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015)
It's a worse New hope
This movie is complete trash.
SIMILARITY
It's really similar to a new hope there is nothing new with it.
The beginning were Kylo ren kills a lot of people is similar to the beginning of a new hope.
Ray lives in a dessert planet with no family members is similar to luke but the only difference is that look had family who lived with them but they died later.
Han solo getting killed is similar to Ben kenobi getting killed.
i could be here all day explaining why it's similar but you can just check any other reviewer for that answer.
CHARACTERS
Fin is a garbage character.
He has mental breakdown for some people then later killing a stormtrooper with a lightsaber and he is fine he has no development and he is to virtuous for my
taste.
Rey is a bad character she is not a mary sue but pretty clo0se to being one (if you wanna see a true mary sue watch wonder women) but she is an underdeveloped character with no personality whatsoever.
Kylo ren is a annoying cry baby that destroys everything as soon as stuff don't go his way.
And Han solo is uninteresting and his death was a pretty bad one cause i had no emotional interest in him.
FINAL ACT
It was a mess bad action and the ending didn't really make sense.
yeah sure Kylo ren was hurt so that's why Rey could defeat him but Kylo is a better force user and i think it was said that you could use the force to enhance strength and Kylo could do just that but anyways maybe i'm talking crap.
VERDICT
Hey at lest it's better than phantom menace
Safe (2012)
It's about a chinese plot device
This movie is not good at all.
ACTION
Before we say the bad stuff let me say the good stuff.
The action was great, not amazing but great and they used the shaky cam or fast cut right.
CHARACTERS
Mei is a plot device.
She is this smart girl and they give her a quick showcase of who she is but she is still a plot device.
All she is, is a smart girl who has numbers in her head and she is a bad actor as well.
What i wanted them to do is give her character more depth and improve the relationship with Luke and Mei.
Luke is also bad.
He has this hero complex and that's it no more depth.
But things never get hard for Luke he never gets to face any challenges or conflict in this movie which makes him boring and bland.
the chinese man who was gonna be Mei's father was a character with potential they just wasted.
He wanted to be a good dad for Mei for some reason so it gave him ore layers and that everything isn't black and white or something but they killed him off to use one of the worst villains i have ever seen in movies.
VILLAIN
He has so little screen time that he shouldn't even be called a villain but because he was in the climax he is instantly a villain and he is bad.
he arrives near the end of the movie and kills the chinese staels Mei drives somewhere does the stupid decision of fist fighting Luke and when things were seeming interesting Mei shots him on the leg and Luke kills the villain.
VERY ANTI-CLIMACTIC.
VERDICT
This movie is bad it's a disappointment i couldn't even enjoy it.
4/10 no-one likes chinese plot devices.
Power Rangers (2017)
wE ShOUlD BuILd a bANd
This movie is a complete mess.
DIALOGUE
The dialogue has a bunch of cringy one liners and it's not good at all.
They have a tendency to explain everything to us instead of showing us which is stupid.
CHARACTERS
It feels like they tried to give the characters depth but during the production they just ignored it.
Jason has daddy issues and that gets ignored through the rest of the movie, Zack has a dying mother and that gets ignored as well, Trini has strict parents and that gets ignored, and the pink ranger has some school drama and that gets ignored (probably for the better).
None of them have true desires and motives and they dont change and grow and how they got together was stupid.
Jason protected black boy and pink ranger conveniently swam in that place were black boy explode stuff and Zack is just conveniently sitting somewhere and star power shows up from nowhere.
There was this scene were trini ran away from the others for no reason and i was confused.
VILLAIN
The villain wants gold and she is stupid
first she has no real motive than to get kristalls cause of power which is really bland.
And also she is stupid.
She attacks Star power for no reason and explains were she is headed and then leaves her and dosen't even kill her which is very stupid.
And once they found the villain cause she explained were she was to Star power then they all go there get captured and then the villain explains her freaking plan which is really cliche and stupid.
ACTION
The action is bland and there is nothing special to it and the final act was worse than black panthers final act.
How could they now that the megazord had wings that could be used as daggers when they have never even seen how the megazord looks? I'ts stupid.
VERDICT
This movie is a cliche mess that should have never existed.
There is already tons of power rangers series and movies why make another? Oh right i know, money.