4/10
Sadly, has not aged well
24 April 1999
I can understand how this film would have been so well-received back when it first came out, but quite simply, time has not been kind to this movie. In my opinion, this film is far too slow-moving and simplistic to be considered a masterpiece, much like most of the early films that are considered classics today. This film was far too tame to have an impact on me, and I must confess that I found it to be frequently boring as well. I can certainly appreciate the effort that was put forth, and I can recognize that a great deal of talent worked on this film, but by today's standards, this movie just doesn't measure up.
16 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed