An underappreciated movie
4 December 2002
Sure, it's a bit corny and "preachy" by today's standards, but when I watched it for the first time, I was somewhat impressed. When taken in the context of it's time (the early fifties), it stands up fairly well. Ronald Reagan was a better actor than he is given credit for by many people.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed