Disappointing sequel - don't bother
22 July 2003
I was disappointed. The first movie had some purpose - a reason for the excessive nudity. Nothing against excessive nudity, but this movie's storyline was so incredibly unbelievable (yes, I know that's redundant - that was the point). Also, the camera work in the first movie was much better. All things considered, I would not bother watching this one again. Had I known then what I know now, I would not have bothered watching it the first time.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed