I loathe "Blue Velvet", so I should have known better, but due to Ebert's strong review (BTW he panned "Blue Velvet" too, so I thought there may be some salvation fo Lynch here) I gave it a shot. Never again. You suckered me for the last time Lynch. For the record: bizareness does not equal creativity. Something inscrutable does not mean it is intelligent. There is a such a thing as being too obscure and when one has to look at the credits to see if the same actress played two different characters you have failed the viewer.
I will say that unlike "Velevet" this did have a couple of entertaining scenes: The inept hit man and the reading for the part in a film.
I will say that unlike "Velevet" this did have a couple of entertaining scenes: The inept hit man and the reading for the part in a film.