2/10
Eww!!!
19 November 2005
I really don't get why this movie got an 8.2 out of ten. There is so many awful things to say I don't even know where to start! First of all, the whole thing seemed rushed, although it was better than the previous ones, but there was still something about it that seemed like they were trying to get through it all in time. This also made it seem like it took place in a really short amount of time, much less than a year. But if that was the case? Why did they have so many extra bits? Like the graveyard dream? Or the AWFUL scene where the Beauxbatons and Durmstrang people came into the hall, or the whole flying all over Hogwarts fighting the badly done dragon scene. And they cut so many good parts, like Rita being an Animagus. Plus, they seemed to want to save money by cutting Dobby, the Dursleys, and Mrs. Weasley from the movie Another thing was the LOTR-esquire scene with the music and everything. Oh, and the hero- ifying harry. JK Rowling does that enough in the books. Like having Harry be the only witness to the dark mark? It just seems like they're making him into an even more wonderful, wildly talented saintly person then he really is. Having said all that, I really liked Robert Pattinson as Cedric Diggory, and I adored Ron and the Weasley twins (of course). And this was, hands down, the best HP movie, which says a lot about the other three (what I thought of them, anyway).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed