Jeff Bridges is one of my favorite actors; Tim Blake Nelson, Joe Pants, and Glenn Headley, while not my 'faves', are nonetheless always a good supporting cast, sturdy character actors. Anyway, I was predisposed to like this movie, and I kinda did. It wasn't a great movie, which was a surprise and a disappointment. It was sort of dim, and had--- not a darkness, exactly--- but a kind of a threadbare-ness, a shabbiness about it. It wasn't just that the characters portrayed were low-lifes, poor, uneducated, and mostly losers (albeit kindly ones). The dimness went deeper than that. Maybe the film was blurred, or the lighting wasn't crisp--- dunno. But SOMETHING was 'off', like milk on the last day of its shelf life. You keep asking yourself--- has this gone bad? But then, you keep drinking it.
And the studio changed the movie's name. I saw it in Wales (in the UK), months ago. Evidently the advance buzz was pretty bad. So they changed it from 'The Moguls' to 'The Amateurs'. A sure sign of desperation. But, alas, that's not going to save it.
Jeff Bridges plays lovable, 'ordinary' guys that are extra solid, and extra real. He plays characters that are very easy for a man (I'm about his age, and coincidentally lived in Santa Barbara, his town, for years) to relate to. At least I do. It appears, based on his wide appeal, that women like him too. I also admire him for eschewing the Red Carpet, paparazzi-chasing kind of celebrity grab that so many other actors have fallen prey to (IMHO: Brad Pitt, Ben Afflect, Julia Roberts, to name but a few). Unfortunately, the tone set here was either missed, or set too low. Bridge's characters, and the supporting cast's characters, are just too loser-y, too dim, too depressing.
This movie also reminded me of 'The Big Lebowski'--- another Jeff Bridges movie, and another dark-ish movie about low-lifes, but one that was much, much better done than 'The Moguls' (now known as 'The Amateurs'). The derivativeness kind of rankled with me a bit.
This movie could have been brighter, funnier, and stronger. It could have been better. It has a few things to admire, though, so if you've seen everything else at your theater, or nothing else strikes your fancy, try this one. And, let's all hope meanwhile that Jeff Bridges' next movie will be more like his usual great work.
And the studio changed the movie's name. I saw it in Wales (in the UK), months ago. Evidently the advance buzz was pretty bad. So they changed it from 'The Moguls' to 'The Amateurs'. A sure sign of desperation. But, alas, that's not going to save it.
Jeff Bridges plays lovable, 'ordinary' guys that are extra solid, and extra real. He plays characters that are very easy for a man (I'm about his age, and coincidentally lived in Santa Barbara, his town, for years) to relate to. At least I do. It appears, based on his wide appeal, that women like him too. I also admire him for eschewing the Red Carpet, paparazzi-chasing kind of celebrity grab that so many other actors have fallen prey to (IMHO: Brad Pitt, Ben Afflect, Julia Roberts, to name but a few). Unfortunately, the tone set here was either missed, or set too low. Bridge's characters, and the supporting cast's characters, are just too loser-y, too dim, too depressing.
This movie also reminded me of 'The Big Lebowski'--- another Jeff Bridges movie, and another dark-ish movie about low-lifes, but one that was much, much better done than 'The Moguls' (now known as 'The Amateurs'). The derivativeness kind of rankled with me a bit.
This movie could have been brighter, funnier, and stronger. It could have been better. It has a few things to admire, though, so if you've seen everything else at your theater, or nothing else strikes your fancy, try this one. And, let's all hope meanwhile that Jeff Bridges' next movie will be more like his usual great work.