When I had heard first about Paolini and his "great" book, I thought it could not be successful. But it has been... I don't understand that. Because of it's success there must be a movie based on the book. "Great"! The story was boring and contained several schemes. The young boy who are the chosen? No! Not again!!! I think Eragon is the mixture of Frodo and Luke Skywalker - mixture of their worst attributes. Sapphira? Oh, yeah! A Dragon who mustn't be killed. Such an individual mark of this bad film. Jeremy Irons and Malkovich could have saved this movie but their acting were as poor as the other freak and amateur actors. I think because of the director's poverty. When will the movie-maker guys be able to understand that making a copy of other movies not a sin. But that's it when they can't sell it as an exciting film and they cannot bring any own idea in it. That's the problem with Eragon. And I'm not talking about only the movie... 4/10, because it's not an Uwe Boll-movie.
