It's 1968 and America is in turmoil. Martin Luther King has been shot, riots have broken out across the country, the Vietnam War is faltering, Robert Kennedy has been assassinated and Richard Nixon is campaigning for President.
The American Broadcasting Corporation also has its troubles. As the third (or fourth) network of three, it is struggling. To improve their ratings during the two political presidential conventions, they come up with an idea that will change TV forever. That idea is to put together William F Buckley, arch-conservative interviewer and writer with Gore Vidal, the Oscar Wilde like infant terrible of the political and literary scene as convention commentators.
There's one small problem. Both men loath and detest each other. Yet despite their earlier clashes, they agree to work with each other for the ten days covering both conventions.
This is the basis for the documentary, Best of Enemies which covers the debates between Vidal and Buckley. Both men had clashed before but this was the first time they would be withing arm's length of each other. And what results is electrifying and ultimately disappointing.
Two intellectual giants trade brilliant insults and swap clever put downs. But at no time is there any meeting of minds. In fact the debate created an unbroken animosity between the two men.
Best of Enemies is fascinating : a super sugar hit for a political junkie with an unfortunate climb down. Scarily, the commentary offered on the politics of the day still is relevant now, despite the change in word and phrase as well as manners over the years. Sadly, too, the dynamic of pitting two protagonists, neither of whom will listen to the other, is now the basis of present media political commentary. Finally, this dynamic has resulted in a fragmentation of media coverage (both mainstream and new). Now the media no longer provides multiple points of view for multiple audiences, it now provides what people want to hear. Which began with Vidal versus Buckley.
Best of Enemies is an enjoyable, extremely well put together but ultimately dis quietening documentary.
The American Broadcasting Corporation also has its troubles. As the third (or fourth) network of three, it is struggling. To improve their ratings during the two political presidential conventions, they come up with an idea that will change TV forever. That idea is to put together William F Buckley, arch-conservative interviewer and writer with Gore Vidal, the Oscar Wilde like infant terrible of the political and literary scene as convention commentators.
There's one small problem. Both men loath and detest each other. Yet despite their earlier clashes, they agree to work with each other for the ten days covering both conventions.
This is the basis for the documentary, Best of Enemies which covers the debates between Vidal and Buckley. Both men had clashed before but this was the first time they would be withing arm's length of each other. And what results is electrifying and ultimately disappointing.
Two intellectual giants trade brilliant insults and swap clever put downs. But at no time is there any meeting of minds. In fact the debate created an unbroken animosity between the two men.
Best of Enemies is fascinating : a super sugar hit for a political junkie with an unfortunate climb down. Scarily, the commentary offered on the politics of the day still is relevant now, despite the change in word and phrase as well as manners over the years. Sadly, too, the dynamic of pitting two protagonists, neither of whom will listen to the other, is now the basis of present media political commentary. Finally, this dynamic has resulted in a fragmentation of media coverage (both mainstream and new). Now the media no longer provides multiple points of view for multiple audiences, it now provides what people want to hear. Which began with Vidal versus Buckley.
Best of Enemies is an enjoyable, extremely well put together but ultimately dis quietening documentary.