Code of Honor (2016)
1/10
Steven Seagals cheapest looking movie to date!
9 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
According to IMDb, this movie had a budget of 8 million dollars. Steven Seagal must have gotten a large sum of that, because this is his cheapest looking movie to date.

1: At many places the dialog is looped very poorly, I don't even think that it is the actual actors voices that they used, and if it is it is done very poorly. (Fun Fact: I many Steven Seagal movies it is his voiced that is often looped, but not this time)

2: This doesn't feel like a movie! It looks like a TV movie, but with boobs. Poorly shot and edited.

3: Almost no squibs or blank shots! 99% of the time a gun is fired, it is poorly CGI and the blood effects are also horrible. The actors are not even trying to make it look like there is a recoil. And when they die it looks so silly. CLearly they were not given direction on how to fall down.

4: Plot twist: This must be the only Steven Seagal movie with a plot twist. But at the end you are just confused whether or not it is true or not. And not in a good David Lynch type of way.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed