Greetings from Lithuania.
"Jurassic Park III" (2001) has to be one of the most shortest running blockbusters i have ever seen. While it was fun movie overall, i couldn't believed my eyes when the credits started to roll - nevertheless at running time 1 h 22 min. it delivered what it promised, sort of. Parts III was always in my opinion then a 2nd movie, which was pretty bad overall, with exception of action sequences and stunning special effects, even S.Spielberg has admit it. III-rd movie of the second hand was much more better paced. While it didn't have that "WOW" factor, it still was a pretty fun adventure.
Overall, "Jurassic Park III" isn't really great adventure, but its far better then "Lost World". It has great special effects, some new dinosaurs and fun adventures. Pretty OK movie overall.
"Jurassic Park III" (2001) has to be one of the most shortest running blockbusters i have ever seen. While it was fun movie overall, i couldn't believed my eyes when the credits started to roll - nevertheless at running time 1 h 22 min. it delivered what it promised, sort of. Parts III was always in my opinion then a 2nd movie, which was pretty bad overall, with exception of action sequences and stunning special effects, even S.Spielberg has admit it. III-rd movie of the second hand was much more better paced. While it didn't have that "WOW" factor, it still was a pretty fun adventure.
Overall, "Jurassic Park III" isn't really great adventure, but its far better then "Lost World". It has great special effects, some new dinosaurs and fun adventures. Pretty OK movie overall.