First of all: bad acting, bad acting, bad acting.
Need I say more?
OK then... let's see.
A movie that lasts barely 90 minutes which has a 10 minutes title opening.
Got the picture?
Nothing mind shattering is happening during the opening. Just a lot of bla-bla delivered as badly as these actors (and actresses) ever could.
The director must have had "Dune" in mind, since this picture opens with a female narrator and goes on and on about a story that those ho ever watched the original one well remember.
It was probably done for those affected by Alzheimer's disease (poor sods...).
The rest is not even close to a sequel. Just a lot of "macho" acting, some stupid giggling around for no reason and a story line (if one can call it that) that is as confused as the rest of this movie.
I believe the writers of this homunculus of a movie must have sniffed too much cocaine, or meth, and have just read comics, instead of true literature.
I am aware that there are some around here and elsewhere, who have praised the sequel as "solid". I don't know where they were while watching this, or what kind of other distraction may have confused their minds, but they apparently never really watched a truly well made movie, and I do not mean a blockbuster movie - just a well directed and acted one - there are some low budget movies that have astonished me in my own lifetime, but not this one.
This is simply trash, despite the presence of Kevin Sorbo and Lee Horsley (who also starred in the original one).
Sorry to disappoint you all with my own view, but if I had had the money, I would certainly have produced a much better and more inventive movie than this one.
So, in short, if you want to watch it go on and do it. If you like it, the better for you.
My copy landed in the trash bin and into oblivion as it should have been when produced...
Need I say more?
OK then... let's see.
A movie that lasts barely 90 minutes which has a 10 minutes title opening.
Got the picture?
Nothing mind shattering is happening during the opening. Just a lot of bla-bla delivered as badly as these actors (and actresses) ever could.
The director must have had "Dune" in mind, since this picture opens with a female narrator and goes on and on about a story that those ho ever watched the original one well remember.
It was probably done for those affected by Alzheimer's disease (poor sods...).
The rest is not even close to a sequel. Just a lot of "macho" acting, some stupid giggling around for no reason and a story line (if one can call it that) that is as confused as the rest of this movie.
I believe the writers of this homunculus of a movie must have sniffed too much cocaine, or meth, and have just read comics, instead of true literature.
I am aware that there are some around here and elsewhere, who have praised the sequel as "solid". I don't know where they were while watching this, or what kind of other distraction may have confused their minds, but they apparently never really watched a truly well made movie, and I do not mean a blockbuster movie - just a well directed and acted one - there are some low budget movies that have astonished me in my own lifetime, but not this one.
This is simply trash, despite the presence of Kevin Sorbo and Lee Horsley (who also starred in the original one).
Sorry to disappoint you all with my own view, but if I had had the money, I would certainly have produced a much better and more inventive movie than this one.
So, in short, if you want to watch it go on and do it. If you like it, the better for you.
My copy landed in the trash bin and into oblivion as it should have been when produced...