I think IMDb need to verify the authenticity of the reviewers because there is no way this pathetic movie deserves a rating above 5. I can only presume that the reviewers on the first page were all paid shills.
And why are they all on the first page? Presumably as soon as the film appeared on IMDb they all got to work to fill the first page up with great reviews. So here is the truth - it's rubbish, pathetic rubbish. I watched the first 10 minutes and decided to come here to find out if it really was as bad as I thought it was. I actually read the reviews on the first page and decided to give it a bit longer, hoping it would improve. After 45 minutes I'd had enough.
The rating here is fake. Just like fake news, IMDb is being used to promote bad films by a few "reviewers" that are in fact shills. It's very worrying because it means we cannot believe IMDb's ratings any more.
Shame.
So if you watch this film, you have been warned.
And why are they all on the first page? Presumably as soon as the film appeared on IMDb they all got to work to fill the first page up with great reviews. So here is the truth - it's rubbish, pathetic rubbish. I watched the first 10 minutes and decided to come here to find out if it really was as bad as I thought it was. I actually read the reviews on the first page and decided to give it a bit longer, hoping it would improve. After 45 minutes I'd had enough.
The rating here is fake. Just like fake news, IMDb is being used to promote bad films by a few "reviewers" that are in fact shills. It's very worrying because it means we cannot believe IMDb's ratings any more.
Shame.
So if you watch this film, you have been warned.