Review of Gog

Gog (1954)
5/10
Slow-moving and talky sci-fi mystery
17 October 2019
Something, or someone, is killing people at a super-secret, deep-underground, atomic-powered military research base that is overseen by 'Nuclear Operative Variable Automatic Computer' (NOVAC), a powerful electronic brain, and its hench-robots Gog and Magog (names of complex Biblical/Talmudic origins). This is the third of Ivan Tor's 'hard-science' OSI (Office of Scientific Investigation) series (preceded by 'The Magnetic Monster' (1953) and 'Riders to the Stars' (1954)). Typical of Tor's SF films, 'Gog' is very talky, as OSI agent David Sheppard (Richard Egan) is toured around the base and all the various gadgets carefully explained, but despite the po-faced attempts at technical credibility, most of the 'science' on display, as well as the story's resolution, makes little sense. The cast, like the script, is earnest and boring, and other then the cranky Dr. Zeitman (John Wengraff), none of the characters are very interesting. The film starts well, with the deaths-by-ultrafreezing of a scientist and (surprisingly) his pretty assistant, but bogs down as the investigation progresses. A number of scenes go on too long, notably the unconvincing simulated reduced-gravity demonstration and the endless stock-footage of jet fighters pursuing a mysterious high-altitude rocket plane. Most of the special effects are simplistic and unconvincing but the robots are refreshingly machine-like, rather than the clanking metal humanoids common in the genre at the time (although why, since they are designed to service the atomic reactor, they are equipped with flame-throwers, is a head-scratcher). The film is very much a product of its times, with a 'We need to get there first' attitude to space exploration - the epilogue is ludicrous. Tors deserves credit for trying to make 'real science fiction' movies, rather than just more giant bug or alien invasion flics, but unfortunately, 'real' usually isn't very interesting and does not stand the test of time as well as the less credible, but far more entertaining, monster movies. Why the film is named for one of the robots, who are relatively bit players, is puzzling.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed