Someone posted that Dog is not a legal bounty hunter. He posted all the details BUT, reading literacy is a big deal when quoting something that they think would pertain to their case. Now, if Dog was sworn in as a bounty hunter the year 2000 or later (as stated in his post) then yes, Dog would not be legal. But Dog has been in the bounty hunter business for decades and before the year 2000. Waaaay before 2000. So, him being a convicted felon doesn't apply to him as stated in the facts you posted. Shame... dismissing one's character simply because you failed to read!! I will have you know that Before Dog was on TV, he was already one of the best bounty hunters in the country. He was discovered by another A&E's series about strange/unusual jobs.
Review of Dog the Bounty Hunter
Dog the Bounty Hunter
(2003–2012)
If only people would research before posting something as fact...
8 November 2019