After reading the comments, I needed to add something. It is hard to watch and it is meant to be that way. Of course as some people write we, as a willingly audience are part of the abuser but not the way Pasolini did in salo or more recently with squid game.
Here we are also part of those who have been chocked! And it is interesting to see how the bored people looking fro exotic sex didn't want her because she was crying... they were looking for consent and not rape.
That is also a point. And when I read that after ten minute the director made his point I'm puzzled. This woman, who let her country unwillingly which was not in the movie has been abused but also they made part of it, by make her believe that this was acting! And a. Most remarkable moment was when the British actress try to defend her by highlighting this fact : that is to say is acting about exhibition?
At what point can we talk about acting or else... This was one of the major abuse which has been crowned by the insulting behavior of one of the most important professor of that time.
So in that regard maybe some people should look a second time.
Here we are also part of those who have been chocked! And it is interesting to see how the bored people looking fro exotic sex didn't want her because she was crying... they were looking for consent and not rape.
That is also a point. And when I read that after ten minute the director made his point I'm puzzled. This woman, who let her country unwillingly which was not in the movie has been abused but also they made part of it, by make her believe that this was acting! And a. Most remarkable moment was when the British actress try to defend her by highlighting this fact : that is to say is acting about exhibition?
At what point can we talk about acting or else... This was one of the major abuse which has been crowned by the insulting behavior of one of the most important professor of that time.
So in that regard maybe some people should look a second time.