This is not a well laid out story. The narrative follows a few cases and doesn't really make a case for showing what they seem to be trying to show.
I think the interviews as shown jump around to much and before any closure is made around the conviction they are on to the next case to show a similar thing happening.
Unlike journalism, the criminal court system relies on evidence and testimony. When interviews outline a series of events, and then subsequent questions change those events ... it becomes difficult to find out what really happened. This is made even more difficult when videos are around that do not show a forced situation or corroborate with what the victim says happened.
This makes it difficult for the court to find a person guilty of rape. As the court has its own rules to follow when it comes to taking away someone's freedom.
Why the victims would change their testimony to willing admit they made things up ... the viewer will never know. There is no real evidence her aside from self confession of false claims. These people should have talked to an attorney when being questioned by the police.
The show itself is a mess in how it was edited together. The rookie journalist really needs to learn how to weave a story together that approaches this subject from a third person point of view. To outline what took a case from situation victim to situation suspect. In this she failed to do this in a compelling manner.
I think the interviews as shown jump around to much and before any closure is made around the conviction they are on to the next case to show a similar thing happening.
Unlike journalism, the criminal court system relies on evidence and testimony. When interviews outline a series of events, and then subsequent questions change those events ... it becomes difficult to find out what really happened. This is made even more difficult when videos are around that do not show a forced situation or corroborate with what the victim says happened.
This makes it difficult for the court to find a person guilty of rape. As the court has its own rules to follow when it comes to taking away someone's freedom.
Why the victims would change their testimony to willing admit they made things up ... the viewer will never know. There is no real evidence her aside from self confession of false claims. These people should have talked to an attorney when being questioned by the police.
The show itself is a mess in how it was edited together. The rookie journalist really needs to learn how to weave a story together that approaches this subject from a third person point of view. To outline what took a case from situation victim to situation suspect. In this she failed to do this in a compelling manner.