A film that takes its title from the 20th Article of the People's Republic of China's Criminal Law, which pertains to the legal provision of self-defense. I watched this movie specifically on Valentine's Day and was deeply moved by its compelling narrative and satisfying resolution. The film successfully emphasizes the principle that "law should not yield to illegality" while educating its audience about the relevant legal knowledge.
Despite the gratifying outcome, I found myself feeling heavy and oppressed after the movie. The film explores three cases - a bus driver case, a village bully case, and a school bullying case. All of which led me to ponder three questions: Is justice still justice if it comes late? Why is the price for achieving fairness and justice borne by the victim? And how can one wield the weapon of law to best protect oneself and those around them?
The film suggests that "Law must be believed in, or else it is as good as non-existent." But how can the law be believed in? It must resonate with the most fundamental emotional expectations of the public, and it should be a law that is engraved in the hearts of citizens. When it comes to specific cases, especially criminal cases involving crime and punishment, the authorities should not merely rely on experience. They should "get involved personally," viewing the case from the perspectives of the suspect, the victim, and the general public. If the law is applied and executed mechanically, it will become increasingly out of touch and distant from the public.
The film is grounded in reality, with a rigorous plot and clear storyline. The casting is appropriate, and the performances are on point.
Despite the gratifying outcome, I found myself feeling heavy and oppressed after the movie. The film explores three cases - a bus driver case, a village bully case, and a school bullying case. All of which led me to ponder three questions: Is justice still justice if it comes late? Why is the price for achieving fairness and justice borne by the victim? And how can one wield the weapon of law to best protect oneself and those around them?
The film suggests that "Law must be believed in, or else it is as good as non-existent." But how can the law be believed in? It must resonate with the most fundamental emotional expectations of the public, and it should be a law that is engraved in the hearts of citizens. When it comes to specific cases, especially criminal cases involving crime and punishment, the authorities should not merely rely on experience. They should "get involved personally," viewing the case from the perspectives of the suspect, the victim, and the general public. If the law is applied and executed mechanically, it will become increasingly out of touch and distant from the public.
The film is grounded in reality, with a rigorous plot and clear storyline. The casting is appropriate, and the performances are on point.