The Children in the House (1916) User Reviews

Generic Early Talmadge

[Cineanalyst · 5/10 · 12 December 2009]

This is an early feature-length film starring Norma Talmadge; reportedly, it's the earliest that survives. By the following year, her marriage to movie mogul Joseph Schenck and the formation of her own production company would lift her to major stardom. In "Children in the House", however, Talmadge is undistinguished from the rest of the cast. She plays the suffering wife, with an adulterer husband who never shares a scene with her, and she regrets not having married her childhood sweetheart. One of the picture's more interesting sequences informs us of the situation early on in the form of an allegorical fairytale, which Norma's childhood sweetheart tells some children.

From there, the film grows rather uneven and recycles some clichés and generic formulas. It's mostly melodrama, with a bank robbery and a car chase replete with one car crashing off a cliff and a last-minute rescue from a burning building to pick up the action in the climax. The editing becomes fast-paced by the end, and there's a fair amount of cutting back and forth between plots throughout the film. Overall, "Children in the House" is competently made for its time, which is expected from a Fine Arts production: a couple overhead angle shots of passengers in cars standout. Yet, there isn't much of interest here. The motive for the film's second part and climax: the adulterer husband stealing from his father's bank to, apparently, pay for gowns for his girl on the side seems especially unconvincing.

(Note: The Grapevine DVD has a very dark picture.)

Starring Norma Talmadge

[drednm · 23 September 2006]

Interesting melodrama with Norma Talmadge unhappily married. Her husband (Eugene Palette) is in the grasp of a nightclub dancer (Jewel Carmen) who has ties to bank robbers. Talmadge pines for her former boy friend (William Hinckley) but is stoic about dealing with her unhappy life. But then the bank robbers use Palette to gain entry to the bank owned by his father. The blame falls on Hinckley (a bank clerk) who refuses to say he was with Talmadge when the bank was robbed. Having no alibi he is condemned.

But then some children stumble on the bank thieves in an old shack. One escapes and brings help but he too is subdued by the robbers. As they make their getaway, one thug sets fire to the shack. The child is able to summon help just as the escaping robbers (and duped husband) go over a cliff in a wild police chase.

Maybe the most interesting segment of this otherwise standard melodrama is a dream sequence with Hinckly as a "mortal" and Talmadge as a "fairy" and how they are able to cement their love. This was likely the color-tinted scene in the original version and has Talmadge flying over a pond to meet the mortal. Pretty good for 1916, and worth a look to see Norma Talmadge.

The Children in the House review

[JoeytheBrit · 7/10 · 29 June 2020]

Mother-of-two Norma Talmadge is trapped in a loveless marriage to a slimline Eugene Pallette who is infatuated with the exotically named Jewel Carmen, a dancer with connections to the underworld in this briskly paced melodrama from Fine Arts. The situations, which were probably stereotypical even in 1916, eventually relegate Talmadge to the sidelines, but it's pulled off with such energy by the Franklin Brothers - particularly a breathless finale involving a high-speed car chase and a burning shack. Notable also for a short fantasy sequence which relates the key characters' back stories in the form of a fairy tale told to Talmadge's children by her would-be lover (William Hinckley).

A small acorn of a film

[kekseksa · 10 November 2017]

A lot of silly nonsense but a really rather cunningly woven bit of nonsense by the Franklin brothers. They had been encouraged by Griffith (boss at Fine Arts) to make "kiddypics", in fact they had been very specifically hired for the task, having made a film called The Rivals with three child-stars for the Komic Pictures Company. So they got together n expanded collection of tiny tots and a veritable stream of such kiddypics poured forth from the various companies controlled by Griffith, first Majestic/Reliant, then Fine Arts.

With the demise of Fine Arts, the Franklins took their whole brood with them to Fox where they continued the process (the tots now actually billed as The Fox Kiddies). Jack and the Beanstalk 1917 is a typical example.

While still at Fine Srts, they developed another speciality in parallel - Norma Talmadge whom they directed in such films as Going Straight (1916) and Forbidden City (1918). At some point they were bound to have the notion of combining the two. They had already enlisted Bessie Love (fresh from her unforgettable performance as the fish-blower in John Emerson's Mystery of the Leaping Fish) to play in at least one film with their kiddies (Sister of Six 1916), so nothing more natural that they should also make a film that is half-Talmadge half-kiddypic which is exactly what we have here.

More than one reviewer has referred to the "story" within the film, a fairy tale where the actors of the film - Talmadge, Hinckley and a still relatively svelte Eugene Palette all reappear along with the kids who play cupids and dwarfs. This is not quite the first occurrence of such a scene that I know of (there is a rather similar scene in the 1915 Alas and Alack directed by Joe De Grasse for Universal and starring Lon Chaney but this is a rather more elaborate example. And in 1919 the idea really takes wings when it is used by Cecil B. DeMille for the famous Babylonian fantasy scenes in his bizarre version of James Barrie's The Admirable Crichton, Male and Female and reused yet again in 1921 for the Cinderella sequences in Forbidden Fruit.

By which time the idea goes international, because, far off in Austria, an admirer both of DeMille and Griffith by the name of Mihály Kertész (the future Michael Curtiz) who will use the idea in an even more elaborate fashion (combining it with the idea of parallel stories used by Griffith in Intolerance)for his 1922 epic Sodom and Gomorrah. Not to be outdone, DeMille and Jeannie MacPherson borrowed back the idea as adapted by Kertész (two parallel timescales) for The Ten Commandments in 1923 and Kertész reclaimed the idea again in 1928, shortly after his arrival in the US, for his Noah's Ark. From small acorns.....

There is another curious aspect of the film that has not been remarked upon and that is the way the children (and the viewer) are mad accomplice to what might be described as "justified adultery" - adultery in thought if not quite in deed - on the part of the neglected wife and her former lover. It is I think symptomatic of a subtly changing morality with respect to marriage, a change in which the cinema played a vital role, and which would accelerate in the twenties with the arrival of Lubitsch, Murnau and other European directors and of Greta Garbo and other major European stars.