Single Action (1998) User Reviews

One of the funniest things I've ever seen!

[Cristian-3 · 1/10 · 14 September 2000]

I can't believe this movie was ever made! It steals *entire pages* of dialogue and action from "A Fistful of Dollars", "A Few Dollars More" and "The Good, The Bad and the Ugly". It's supposed to take place in the present but it's still a Western and the "Hero" carries a single action revolver from the 19th century as his weapon, along with his palmtop computer.

I don't know what they were thinking. I don't know if this was meant to make people laugh or not. There are one or two original ideas (such as using the fat man as a shield) which I guess might have come from Gallardo's association with Robert Rodriguez. But the rest is just a way of ripping off Leone. Director/Star Gallardo's "Amigo" (that's his name) apes Clint Eastwood but is nowhere even close as much fun or authentic. He's not a bad actor in other things, but unfortunately he has not paid attention to Eastwood's comment of "A man's gotta know his limitations". ;-) And for one thing, Ennio Morricone is sorely missed! I didn't think Gallardo was as bad as the villain, though. The villain was a ham and he was terrible! His pale imitation of Gian Maria Volonte was embarassing to watch and a lesson that one should never just copy something. The other problem was the video editing. It was shot on film but edited on video like a cheap mexican soap opera. It's full of terrible transitions which have a totally different look from the finished product.

Amazing that this even got made. I strongly suggest anyone who has seen the who Leone trilogy lately should watch this with friends to laugh at it. As a comedy for those in the know I would give it a 7, as a serious self contained movie, I'd have to give it a negative 1000000 in originality.

The Single Action Trivia

[carlosbandido · 10/10 · 6 December 2006]

This movie was dedicated to SERGIO LEONE. The Film is based on actual Political events of Mexico, but the Film language had to be rural. Being a Sergio fan, we decided to make something fast. we were creating something to tell, not something original. That's it. Very Simple. This Movie was shot in 11 days, with a budget of $11,OOO.OO dollars. It's the only movie in Existence that followed our "EL MARIACHI" production tricks, shot in the same town, using the same sets. This was just another example that films like "EL MARIACHI" can be done For a Few Dollars More. This Film was shot on 16MM. The 35MM print had a cost of almost $90,000.00 dollars. The reason for the print was because Germany and japan wanted the film for the cinemas. In reality I made this very clear from the beginning. "We are making this film for the video market and nothing else". To My surprise the sales at AFM were over my expectations and a 35MM print needed to be delivered. In the summer of 1997 "SINGLE ACTION" broke the records of YORK ENTERTAINMENT, making the company grow. KINGSIZE ENTERTAINMENT'S job was only on the Post-production, and the EXECUTIVE PRODUCER'S credit was given to them because we finished the film in their facilities and with their contacts help. That's it. That's the Single Trivia.

Once Before a Time in Mexico

[winner55 · 9/10 · 29 June 2006]

A direct remake of Sergio Leone's For a Few Dollars More, but with a heavy dose of post-modernism and Mexican politics. The post-modernism gives the film a sense of humor that defines it as a film unique to its time, the politics defines it as unique to its place.

The acting is intentionally flat. This is a film that is visually about icons and iconoclasm. It is meant to raise the question, can Mexico rid itself of its 19th century ethics and enter the 21st century? The film acknowledges that there is a certain nobility to those 19th century ethics, but, unfortunately, a great deal of corruption as well.

This is remarked in the title, which is a reference to the pistol the undercover cop carries, a pistol salvaged from obscurity by Sergio Leone. Hollywood westerns had long presented the gunfighters of the old West as carrying standard-barrel double-action colts - pulling the trigger both cocks the hammer and springs it down onto the shell to ignite the powder that sends the actual bullet to its destination. What Leone discovered, in researching A Few Dollars More was that most gunslingers actually carried long-barreled single-action revolvers, since, having been issued to officers in the Civil War, these were widely and cheaply available. This means that to get the hammer in position to strike the shell, one first had to cock it manually with one's thumb or with one's free hand. That's why in Leone's Westerns, when a pistol has to be fired several times in quick succession, the shooter has to fan the hammer with his free hand. The one mythic element that Leone retained from the old Hollywood Westerns was that pistols back then could be fired with deadly accuracy. Actually, they had virtually no accuracy at all. At the famous shoot-out at the OK Corrall between the Earps and the Clantons, Every shooter involved in the battle could - and needed to - empty their pistols and reload; in most film versions of it, the battle lasts about five minutes; actually it lasted the better part of an hour. Only three Clantons were killed, and two Earps wounded. So much for accuracy! And if this tells us anything, by analogy, about Mexican history and politics, it tells us they are in a bit of a mess.

To take this issue and turn it into a metaphor for the history and politics of Mexico is clearly a risky business, since so few people even know about such matters, so how are they to read the metaphor? That helps explain one reason this film was not popular.

The other reason of course is Gallardo's decision to abandon any effort at giving the film a professional gloss. Since Gallardo had some resources to draw on to give it some such gloss, the lack of it has to have been intentional; and the crude nature of some of the imagery, and most of the acting, give to the film a distinctly raw, "third-world" feel that separates it decisively from any film produced in the US, even low-budget independent films. Gallardo is taking a cue from El Mariachi - a cue Robert Roderiguez missed - and is trying to define a Mexican cinematic aesthetic different from any equivalent found north of the border. Frankly, I think that to a large extent he succeeded; and even where the effort completely fails, the effort is noble, and the result of the experiment fascinating to watch.

Also, I should point out that Roderiguez ripped this movie off for ideas in the making of "Once Upon a Time in Mexico."