"Doctor Who" The Mark of the Rani: Part One (TV Episode 1985) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Three Time Lords for the Price of One
boblipton15 August 2010
"The Mark of the Rani" is a good two-parter from the weakest period of DOCTOR WHO -- I don't find Colin Baker's performance engaging, nor is he aided by the particolored outfit that producer John Nathan-Turner saddled him with. Bolstered by a lot of on-site shooting, Anthony Ainley as the Master and Kate O'Mara in a dynamite debut as renegade Time Lady 'The Rani', this comes off as a good one, led by one-shot WHO director Sarah Hellings and a well-researched, if under-written script by Pip and Jane Baker.

Although nominally set at a conference of now-eminent British scientists and engineers about 1820, only George Stephenson, the developer of an early steam-powered locomotive, figures prominently, although some Luddites show up to suggest the chaos of the era. Most of the script concerns itself with the conflict between the Doctor and the bickering duo of the Master and the Rani.

In terms of performance, I find the Doctor and the Master a little monotonous as they slang each other in the same disdainful tone of voice. O'Mara's outright contempt for the boys is a welcome relief, and the script suggests, without delving into the subject, the societal conflicts between the Doctor's humanism, the Master's hunger for power and the Rani's soulless scientist that might have reflected the concerns of the era. Perhaps a longer serial, linking the social crisis and the conflict between the Time Lords might have made this a better pair of episodes but, given the general poverty of the era, this is, nonetheless, exciting: more than good-enough fun.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Doctor battles Luddites, The Master and The Rani
Sleepin_Dragon29 August 2015
Part 1 sees the Doctor and Peri land in the mining village of Killingworth in the 19th Century, they've been manoeuvred off course as the intended destination was Kew Gardens. They arrive at a particularly turbulent period in history as Luddites destroy machinery, but these men are more savage then normal. The Doctor discovers a group of geniuses are gathering, including George Stephenson and Humphry Davy. The Doctor has more then just the Luddites to deal with, The Master is about, so too is fellow renegade Timelord The Rani, he discovers the reason for her presence on Earth and soon tries manipulating the situation to destroy the Doctor. The Rani needs to extract a tiny amount of fluid from the human brain, she does so by luring men into the bath house and rendering them unconscious. The Doctor deduced that all the victims were clean, and had therefore had a bath, he ventures to the Bath House, where The Rani discovers him.....

This is one of my favourite Colin Baker stories, I can understand why it's a period not to everyone's taste, but I like Colin. Had he been given a different costume, and some better story lines things would have been a lot different, however this was a highlight.

Definitely benefiting from its setting, the production values naturally look fantastic, the Ironbridge works look so good. The costumes are great, apart from the Doctor's revolting clothes and Peri's stomach turning dress, what were they thinking????

Standout performance is undoubtedly Kate O'Mara, she made a seriously impressive debut, she definitely made her stamp. The Master was a little one dimensional simply feuding with The Doctor, she had lots more layers, purposeful, intelligent, seeing both The Doctor and The Master as a mere inconvenience. The Rani needs to return one day!

Overall a very interesting story, great music, some very good performances (Kate O'Mara) and lots for the Doctor to deal with, a fun cliffhanger, sadly Peri is rather obsolete in Part 1. 8/10
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"If this place gives you the creeps lets get out of it." Pretty good Colin Baker story.
poolandrews18 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Doctor Who: The Mark of the Rani: Part 1 starts as the Doctor (Colin Baker) & Peri (Nicola Bryant) are due to arrive at Kew Gardens, however the TARDIS instead materialises in England in Killingworth near Newcastle during the 19th Century. The Doctor's instruments sense another Time Lord nearby & he decides to investigate, the Doctor & Peri stumble across a mining pit which according to it's owner Lord Ravensworth (Terence Alexander) has suffered from outbursts of violence amongst it's workers. Intrigued the Doctor investigates further & discovers that an evil female Time Lord called the Rani (Kate O'Mara) has been taking fluid from people's brains for her experiments & to add to his problems the Master (Anthony Ainley) is in fact alive & wants revenge...

This Doctor Who adventure was episode 5 from season 22 that originally aired here in the UK during early 1985 & was Colin Baker's third story as the Doctor, directed by Sarah Hellings this is a good story during a time when the show was on a bit of a downward spiral. The script by Pip & Jane Baker is a rarity amongst many 70's & 80's Doctor Who stories in that it takes place in a genuine historical setting & it marks the first time the show makes reference to a real life historical figure in the inventor of the steam engine George Stevenson since William Hartnell met Wyatt Earp among other's at the gunfight at the OK Corral during The Gunfighters (1966). The best aspect of Mark of the Rani is the fun & often quite amusing banter & dialogue between the three Time Lords (even though it never explains how the Master comes back from the dead after his last appearance in Planet of Fire (1984) where he was supposedly killed) on show as they try to out-insult other other & the Doctor & Peri don't argue much during this one which helps. This was a story from when Doctor Who changed it's format from four 25 minute episodes to two 45 minute episodes & it works pretty well here, it moves along at a nice pace, it never bores & there's a great cliffhanger at the end of this episode. The one thing which isn't too great is the actual basic story, it's maybe a touch simplistic, it's a little lacking in ideas & not that exciting either.

Mark of the Rani was actually shot at a living museum, the Blists Hill Open Air Museum in Ironbridge which means everything looks pretty authentic & the studio bound sets are also impressive. There hasn't really been any special effects in this episode & there's no monsters either, the costumes are good as well but what on earth is Peri wearing? The pink high heels are fine but that horrible yellow dress looks ridiculous. The acting is a bit suspicious as are some of the accents but that adds to the fun, it's amazing some of the extras who appear in these things & Terence Alexander of Bergerac (1981 - 1991) fame turns up here as does Kate O'Mara before she starred in Dynasty (1986) in the first Doctor Who story to feature the Rani.

Mark of the Rani isn't the greatest Doctor Who story ever but it's still good fun & provides enough entertainment to satisfy, a must for fans & those looking for some sci-fi fun.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Time Lord Trouble in the Industrial Revolution
zotwot15 June 2014
I really enjoyed this story, more so than I expected. The Rani is a really good character a renegade Time Lord who has better things to do than constantly hassle the Doctor. A female villain was long overdue (I'm not sure if there are any female villains up to this point?) and Kate O'Mara portrays her brilliantly. It also worked well having the Master present- it adds to the story and makes the Rani appear more powerful as in many ways she is the Master's superior.

The setting was a really good one too. I think the early Industrial Revolution is probably my favourite period in history. I loved that George Stephenson was present and the Luddites were well used. The extensive location filming brought the setting to life too.

Perhaps the best thing about this story is how different it is from most in its era. It feels almost like a light Fourth Doctor story. A setting in the past is unusual here, there is no messages about society and politics and nothing gruesome at all- hardly any one dies and they turn into trees, which is by no means the worst way to go. Also the Sixth Doctor is much more Doctor-ish here than he has been at any point so far.

Three Time Lords for the price of one! All in all, rather good.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Mark of Disappointment
A_Kind_Of_CineMagic20 July 2019
Review for both parts:

This two-parter is another weak story during one of the poorest seasons of the show's history. There are a few positives but a lot of negatives.

The positives include the music which is nice and appropriate for the story and also the period setting is a nice idea whilst not entirely correctly represented. The new villain The Rani is a good addition to the show with Kate O'Mara very charismatic in the role. It is interesting to get a new Time Lord/Lady and another TARDIS. The character is interesting too because she is not 1 dimensional, she is intelligent and pursues science without much conscience but without being a pure evil villain. Her disdainful interaction with the Master adds another dynamic as well as her clash with the Doctor. Unfortunately this promising scenario is largely wasted due to the silliness of the story and the largely lame dialogue. Anthony Ainley hams it up as the Master and with the Rani similarly turned into a panto villain by various unimpressive scenes and nonsensical plot points it all falls apart.

Colin Baker continues to be a very disappointing characterisation of the Doctor. He at least shows moments of compassion here but mostly is still egotistical, rude and conceited. Having a hero who is neither heroic nor in any way endearing is a real minus. Peri is an extremely weak companion with poor acting and an annoying personality which alongside the grating brashness of the 6th Doctor means there is little to hook me into the underwhelming story.

On top of all that the production overall has an embarrassingly pantomime feel with some dodgy acting, cringeworthy, shoddy effects such as the tree person and the dinosaur and some bad fight scenes and set pieces. The supposed exciting action scenes include the Docot hanging down an old mineshaft while being whacked with polystyrene logs and whizzing down a hill while strapped to a trolley. It is pretty pathetic sadly.

A couple of charming guest performances such as Terence Alexander and Gawn Grainger as well as the 3 timelord dynamic, the industrial revolution period setting and the nice music are highlights amongst the mostly unimpressive adventure.

Episode 1 - 5/10, Episode 2 - 3.5/10, Overall - 4.25/10
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Doctor Who and Trouble at t'Pit
JamesHitchcock9 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Doctor Who loses control of his TARDIS yet again, and ends up in the early 19th century. And there's trouble at t'mill. Or rather at t'pit. The peace of the Northumberland mining village of Killingworth is being disturbed by a series of Luddite riots. Those with knowledge of social history might point out that Ludditism was much more widespread in the textile industry than in coal mining, but this is not a goof by the scriptwriters. These particular riots have been fomented- for their own nefarious purposes- by two renegade Time Lords who have arrived in Killingworth, quite independently of one another. (Exactly what their nefarious purposes are would take too long to explain).

One is the Doctor's old enemy, The Master who, like the Doctor, possesses the power to regenerate himself. All The Doctor's many incarnations have been quite different, both in appearance and in personality, from their predecessors, but Anthony Ainley's Master is, with his goatee beard, deliberately similar in appearance to the character played by Roger Delgado in the early seventies, and in personality is just as villainous.

The other renegade is a new character making her first appearance, the female Time Lord (or Time Lady?) known as The Rani. Although both renegades are evil and join forces to fight The Doctor and his companion Peri, their alliance is an uneasy one because of their differing personalities. Unlike The Master, The Rani is not obsessed with power for its own sake, but is a gifted scientist obsessed with scientific knowledge who will do anything, however immoral, to attain it. It was originally intended that Kate O'Mara's character should, like The Master, be a recurring character in the series, but she only appeared in one more serial, "Time and the Rani", before the series temporarily came to an end in 1989.

Although a number of adventures over the years had been set in the Earth's past, this was the first story since the days of the First Doctor to feature genuine historical characters, in this case the engineer and inventor George Stephenson and Lord Ravensworth, a landowner, industrialist and politician and a patron of science and learning. Part of the Master's scheme involves kidnapping Stephenson and other leading scientists and engineers of the time, such as Michael Faraday and Thomas Telford, who have been invited by Ravensworth to a scientific conference. (His ultimate ambition is to force them to work for him, thus giving The Master the power to control Earth's Industrial Revolution from its inception).

Colin Baker's mop of blond hair gave him a youthful appearance, but his Doctor did not really have the same boyish enthusiasm and manner as his predecessor, Peter Davidson. (I always assumed the two actors were around the same age, but in fact Baker was older by several years). His Sixth Doctor could be rather grumpy and irascible and could have something of a superior air about him, lacking the Fifth Doctor's often refreshing humility. One thing that connected the Sixth Doctor with most of his predecessors was an eccentric dress sense; he always wore a brightly coloured coat which made him look like a refugee from a production of "Joseph and His Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat". Nicola Bryant's Peri was probably the best companion of the eighties, certainly better than her predecessor Nyssa, with a feisty and determined personality which recalled Louise Jameson's Leela from the seventies, although the two women were supposed to come from very different backgrounds. Although Nicola was British, she always played Peri as an American. (Was this a deliberate attempt by the producers to increase the series' popularity in America?)

This serial was originally broadcast in February 1985, during the 1984- 85 British miners' strike, so its theme of industrial unrest in the mining industry must have seemed very topical at the time. It is sometimes said that during the late eighties the "Doctor Who" scriptwriters tried to smuggle left-wing, anti-Thatcherite messages into their scripts, but "The Mark of The Rani" seems to have, if anything, a conservative political slant, with its sympathetic portrayal of Ravensworth as a benevolent, enlightened employer, its enthusiastic advocacy of new technology and its critical assessment of the Luddite movement. (The only miners in the story who support machine-breaking are those who have fallen under The Rani's evil influence). During this period "Luddite" was often used as a term of abuse by the political right, especially against trade unionists, although Left-wing historians sometimes tried to rehabilitate the original Luddites, whom they saw as hard-working men driven to desperation by grasping employers.

One commonly quoted received idea about "Doctor Who" is that the series went sharply downhill in the eighties after Tom Baker left the role in 1981. Although there certainly were some feeble episodes during this period, the decade was by no means a period of continuous decline and there were some good adventures, of which "The Mark of The Rani" was one. Certainly, it has its weaknesses, regardless of what one may think of its politics. The idea of a land-mine which turns people into trees rather than blowing them up is more like something from a surreal fantasy than from serious sci-fi, and there is a massive plot hole in the Master's grand scheme. (Why would a Time Lord, a member of a race whose technology far exceeds even that of twentieth century humans, want to kidnap a group of nineteenth-century engineers for their scientific knowledge?) Overall, however, the story is a good one. The early industrial setting (shot on location at the Ironbridge Gorge museum) gives the serial a very distinctive visual look, and O'Mara's Rani was a brilliant addition to the series. It is a pity that more use could not have been made of her.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Music
bengreen-5852418 May 2024
What grabbed me from the beginning of the first episode was the music. Lush, atmospheric, just gorgeous and suitable for the concert hall. So of course a collossal fail as movie music which is meant to enhance the script but not draw attention to itself.

I searched for the composer, Jonathan Gibbs, so I actually could listen to his concert music, but could find no references other than to Doctor Who. Disappointing.

PS The site is refusing my review because it's too brief. Well, that's a new one! I'm used to being cut off. I still need sixty, fifty, forty, thirty, twenty, ten characters...done!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Acceptable but nothing great
Leofwine_draca21 April 2015
Review of the Complete Story:

THE MARK OF THE RANI is a mid-level entry in the run of Dr Who star Colin Baker. It's notable for starring the well-remembered Kate O'Mara as the titular Time Lord, a ruthless woman out for her own ends (what else?) who teams up with Anthony Ainley's Master to give the Doctor and Peri a run for their money, but other than a decent set-up nothing much really happens in this one.

I liked the novelty of the show filming at the Ironbridge open air museum in Shropshire, although the story is set in the north. We're in the 19th century, where the Doctor must contend with a group of Luddites intent on mayhem, alongside the Rani who is busy harvesting brain fluid from unfortunate souls. Inevitably, the Master is along for the ride and just wants to kill the Doctor.

The script is what lets this down, as the story is filled with trite dialogue that goes nowhere. Half the running time just seems to consist of the Master and the Rani bickering. I like Ainley in the role but he has very little to do here other than wander around and bump redshirts off. Baker feels wooden and uninvolved and Peri's even less important, with Nicola Bryant reduced to wandering around in an awful dress. BERGERAC actor Terence Alexander appears as an ally and there's a cameo from George Stephenson, but that's about it.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Morality
Theo Robertson17 February 2014
Arriving in the town of Killingworth in the early 19th Century The Doctor and Peri find social unrest as the Luddites , workers opposed to new technology , riot and destroy machinery . As things turn out these Luddites are under the control of The Master and another renegade from the Time Lords who calls herself the Rani

This is the first DOCTOR WHO script from the husband and wife team of Pip and Jane Baker . The Bakers are considered the worst writers to have ever written for the classic series which is slightly unfair . Certainly they wouldn't be confused with Nigel Kneale but in their defence their stories were often written in a hurry . This story does tend to show up their flaws - one of very unnatural sounding dialogue . This is a failing of season 22 which really suffers from some dreadful dialogue which is probably the fault of script editor Eric Saward It's not helped by the cast either . You can expect Anthony Ainley to camp it up no end and here he does . Kate O'Mara before she relocated to America to star in DYNASTY does bring a feline menace to her character but is let down by all too obvious moralising dialogue . I believe the term is " sententious " and you can't criticise the characters for being monosyllabic . Terence Alexander appears in a supporting role and by this stage in the show's history relatively big name character actors would never be much more than workman like in their roles . We also get an appearance from a real life character George Stephenson the first time in 20 years a real life character had appeared in a pseudo historical and wouldn't be the last time in this season this plot device would be used

The plot itself is very vague and just seems used to set up scenes for characters to spout moral relativism . I quite enjoyed the historical type stories from the Davison era but now that Colin Baker is in the lead there's something missing in these type of tales . The Mark Of The Rani isn't a bad story but if this was a Davison story it would be far more likable
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Mark of the Rani: Part One
Prismark106 April 2024
Pip & Jane Baker make their Doctor Who writing debut. The Rani (Kate O'Mara) makes her villainess time lord introduction. There is location filming in Blists Hill Victorian Town and the Coalport China Museum in Shropshire. The result is a slight above average Doctor Who story.

The Tardis lands in the 19th century mining community in the north east of England. The Rani, an amoral scientist is using a bathhouse to gas miners so she can extract fluids from their brains. It turns them into aggressive thugs.

The Master is also there observing the Rani and he wants to meddle with the development of the Industrial Revolution. The Master wants to take on the Doctor and wants the Rani as an ally.

The Doctor teams up with Lord Ravensworth (Terence Alexander) to find out why the mild mannered miners are turning into angry luddites.

It looks good, there is just not enough story in the first episode. The best bit was the bickering between the Rani and the Master. Although I noticed each time the Rani waved something in front of the Master, he manage to grab it off her.

The acting was iffy. Vengeance on Varos had two hammy extras acting as cannibals. Here some of the miners almost match them, when they become yobs. It verged on silliness.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed