(TV Series)

(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Familiar Theme Could Have been Handled Better
wdavidreynolds2 July 2021
Will Hackett has been released from prison after serving ten years for a failed train robbery attempt. Upon his release, he travels to a farm where Quentin Sargent lives. Sargent, who went by the name Skylar at one time, was also involved in the train robbery, but when he encountered some lawmen inside a train car, he ran. Sargent managed to escape. He eventually settled on the farm outside Dodge City. He is now married to a woman named Geneva.

Hackett makes it clear he despises Sargent. He resents Sargent because he ran away from the robbery and managed to escape any prison time for his part in the crime. Hackett bullies Sargent into going into Dodge to get three horses and some dynamite and related supplies needed for attempting another train robbery. While Sargent is away, Hackett attempts to force himself on Geneva. Hackett is sadistic and enjoys terrorizing the Sargents. He attempts to goad Quentin into a gunfight, but Sargent knows he is no match for Hackett's gun.

The episode becomes a cat-and-mouse game with Hackett's cruelty and criminal plans juxtaposed with Sargent's desperation and resolve.

Other reviewers have noted the casting choices made in this episode. Earl Holliman plays the sadistic Will Hackett character. Holliman appeared in three different Gunsmoke episodes and portrayed men on the wrong side of the law in each. He is sufficiently sinister and convincing as Hackett.

The most interesting casting choice is having Morgan Woodward play the part of Quentin Sargent. Woodward was known for playing either quiet, stoic men, or raving maniac characters. It is odd seeing him play a man who is terrified by his nemesis. He appeared in eighteen different Gunsmoke episodes playing everything from men of wealth and power to mountain men to gang members to completely insane lunatics.

Jennifer West is the naïve Geneva Sargent character in this story. Geneva has a bubbly sort of personality, and she tends to think the best of Hackett until he makes it painfully clear he is not her friend. This was Ms. West's only Gunsmoke appearance. Her career primarily consisted of bit parts in television shows. This role looks to be her last in episodic television.

The bully versus victim story is old as time. The biggest problem with this version is Quentin Sargent's cowardly refusal to attempt to protect himself and Geneva from Hackett. The Sargents would have no business living isolated on the prairie without a shotgun, and a timely shotgun blast could have easily solved their problems. Sargent *allows* his fear to consume him and Hackett to terrorize him. It is exasperating from the perspective of the viewer.

There were even less violent options available. Sargent could have simply gone to Dodge and explained the situation to anyone available in the Marshal's office. It was unlikely a judge would have sentenced Sargent to prison time for a 10-year-old botched robbery from which he ran away. The statute of limitations had likely expired for the crime, anyway.

There are numerous ways this familiar type of story could have been improved, but I did not find it as unpleasant as some other reviewers.

(Footnote: There is an outstanding scene early in the episode where Hackett visits the Long Branch Saloon just as Sam Noonan and Kitty Russell are closing for the night. This scene should not be missed. It is as captivating and tense as any Gunsmoke has ever featured.)
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A triumph of playing "against type"
gary-646592 February 2020
The advantages of casting against type here are obvious with all three principals -- Earl Holliman, Morgan Woodward, and unknown Jennifer West -- giving excellent performances. The drama is heightened to overcome a somewhat cliched story, especially in Holliman's character Hackett, a homicidal maniac whose brain has been additionally addled by 10 years in prison. Unaccountably, this was Jennifer West's last role, aged 30, after 12 years of playing bit parts. She does very well as an obviously intelligent actress playing a really stupid woman. One glaring lapse in the script (unconvincingly inserted to show how stupid she is supposed to be) is when she refers to the just-hired hand Hackett as a "friend". Only on a couple of occasions do her lines stick in her throat, her expression giving it away.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
They get worse than this ... but not much
midnight_raider20018 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This ghastly episode is way up on the list of reasons I wouldn't hire William Kelley or Earl Wallace to write a script for me even if I could afford to pay them and they worked for union scale. Kelley is the culprit here, turning in some mind-bogglingly bad situations in the story of a vengeful ex-con who bullies his way around Dodge to torment a former partner who ran out on him during a robbery for which he spent a long prison sentence. At one point, Hackett (Earl Holliman) grabs the Long Branch's shotgun and shoves it right into bartender Sam Noonan's gut, fully intending to blow him in half. Sam says the weapon isn't loaded (he had just cleaned it), but Hackett pulls the triggers anyway. Click. Click. If Matt Dillon had been around, he would have punched Hackett right into next week; instead Hackett leaves and keeps on stalking his quarry (Morgan Woodward), who's now a farmer. Neither Holliman nor Woodward look the least bit comfortable in their roles (Woodward's character is a sniveling coward; Holliman's is the schoolyard bully who acts about 12 years old; he even talks soprano at a few points when he taunts other characters). When Hackett is finally caught, it's because the farmer tackled him around the legs as if trying to kiss his ... well, you know. It's a toss-up as to whether Holliman is worse here or in "Gunsmoke: Return to Dodge" (1987), but it's not worth three hours of viewing to find out.
6 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This episode never had a chance
kfo949419 June 2012
This episode is so poorly cast that at times if becomes laughable.

Morgan Woodward (Quentin Sargent), who always does well when playing the rough, is cast as a humble coward that spends his time meek and mild even when another character, Hackett, is after his wife. Earl Holliman (Hackett) plays a 30 something brat that runs around trying to be tough but acting like a 15 year old child. Jennifer West (wife of Quentin) tries to play a country farmer's wife but comes across as someone that escape from a mental institution. So no matter how good the script could have been, it was doomed from the start. And the final result will be a episode that is forgettable.

Hackett has just been released from prison after serving ten year term for train robbery. Seems that Quentin was also part of the gang but fled during the robbery and was never captured.

Hackett finds Quentin, who is now a farmer, and runs around the farm causing nothing be trouble. Quentin cowards down so Hackett takes everything he wants including his wife. And the episode plays out with the conflict between the ex-con and the coward.

This episode never had a chance. Even though they had some nice actors, the acting was poor. Blame this one on the casting.
6 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
a colorless rehash of an oft-told tale
grizzledgeezer17 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The conflict that's supposed to drive the basic story is... When will the beleaguered hero's testosterone rise to a level that enables him to "stand up and be a man"? In this version, it never really does.

The casting is certainly questionable. It appears someone had the bright idea of going "against type". But Earl Holliman has such a friendly, folksy voice that no amount to trying to twist it into something ugly can succeed. And Morgan Woodward, who usually portrays emotionally strong, decisive men, is reduced to a wuss.

Few actors can play any-and-every role, so it's unfair and unkind to blame this episode's failure on bad casting. The fault lies with the script. One of the basic rules of screen writing is that the viewer should empathize with the principal characters. That doesn't mean they should be likable, but rather that we should understand their motivations.

On a simpler level, you might say we should know /why/ we're supposed to be interested in these characters. * Instead, what we get is a bunch of stereotypes thrown into a situation we've seen many times before -- as if simply populating a clichéd story outline is enough to engage our attention. (The wife, who initially comes across as a silly airhead, is particularly annoying. Unfortunately, "annoyance" does not equal "interest".)

The script's serious weaknesses might be partly forgiven, /if/ the audience got what it longs for -- Woodward killing or seriously injuring Holliman. (Had this been a Meston script, that's what we would have had. ** But those CBS executives were so /worried/ about protecting the youth of America from violence.) Though Woodward goes after Holliman with a sickle (whose cutting edge could have done great harm), he manages to completely miss him. Woodward finally comes to the rescue by /tackling/ Holliman. (This was so /exciting/ I had to take a couple of blood-pressure pills to keep from blowing out a vessel.)

At least we get to see Robert Totten with his beard on.

* A classic example of the failure to do this is "Support Your Local Gunfighter". The film falls flat from the first scene and never gets up. James Garner's character starts a cipher, and remains one.

** In "The Cabin", Matt offs a villain with a pitchfork, in both the radio and TV versions.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bad casting in this one
marmac27686 February 2023
The biggest problem with this episode is the two main characters, Morgan Woodward as Sargent and Earl Holliman as Hackett. The two parts should have been casted with each actor playing the role of the other. Morgan Woodward has always been best as "the heavy", the bad, ruthless bad guy. His casting as a cowardly milquetoast farmer was just all wrong. There is no way that Woodward, as good an actor as he was, could play this part and do it well.

Holliman, on the other hand, could have played the Sargent part if he had been offered it. I think of Holliman part in "The Sons Of Katie Elder" where Holliman played one of the "sons". Out of all of "The Sons Of Katie Elder", he was the only one that showed no backbone and was a milquetoast himself. He could have just played that part in this episode. The "background" bad guys are also just put in for no reason and they add nothing to the plot. One of the weaker Gunsmoke eps.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed