"Ironside" Camera... Action... Murder! (TV Episode 1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Oddly flat with depressing killings and abrupt ending without explanation
TopekaBob21 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
In this Ironside Officer Fran Belding gets the Eve Whitfield treatment, in which she falls in love immediately with someone who is a chief suspect for murder. But at least in this case it's an interesting guy, played by Joe Don Baker.

This is kind of a depressing episode because basically we get to see three "snuff films" - the killer films himself killing three young women. They even show the bullet hitting one of the women. It's pretty awful. And yet they don't seem overly concerned, at least not any more than any other case. Can you imagine the bedlam and sensationalism if someone really was sending police videos of murders?

The strangest part of the episode is that it never explains why (SPOILER) the lawyer is the killer. They say the killer is killing the other girls (and Fran?) to cover up the killing of the one he wanted to kill, but why? My guess is that it was some elaborate plot by the lawyer to get rid of his trustees of the estate he was executor for and was so convoluted of a motive that they just gave up explaining it. This would happen in the old Perry Mason's, of course, where sometimes one had no idea why the murderer killed someone. But it's kind of jarring to see it in Ironside. Unlike Perry Mason, Ironside often went with the "psychotic" angle to explain murders, which in the 1970's was pretty valid! (and still is).

Fun to see Mark in police academy outfit. Already carrying a gun! He works fast! Although he skips a day at the academy to work on the case, which I'm not sure is how the police academy works.

The big star before he was a star here is Joe Don Baker, later to be Buford Pusser in Walking Tall.

And, Ironside continues to drive himself around!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
After the fact, the motive is clear -- albeit unstated
amorehl7 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The reasoning for the murders which we would expect to have explained at the end never comes. That's frustrating. I believe the problem can be laid at the door of those who edit these episodes to fit in the same one-hour space they fit in originally. Only, now, there are 3 or 4 times the commercials that ran in 1972. So scenes get cut, and we re left to speculate as to what got taken out. I wish some network would start making the running time longer (like 75 minutes), perhaps pair it with another newly full-length 75-minute old show and run the episodes as they originally ran, yet with space for all their extra commercials.

Anyway, in hindsight, the motive is actually pretty straight-forward. Ironside explains part of it, that only one victim is the actual target. The rest are there to mislead the police. Here, the lawyer is the executor of the estate of 2 young people: the murdered girl and her eccentric brother who likes to film people. The lawyer kills the girl, and a couple of random other women, and sets up the brother as the "psychotic" killer. He also targets Fran because the brother had made her acquaintance. Presumably, if his plan had succeeded, he would have had all the estate's money for his own use. Not a bad plan, I've certainly seen worse.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Shoots them with a gun, shoots them with a camera
bkoganbing8 July 2017
After watching this Ironside episode I'm still not sure what the point of it all was.

The Ironside team is assigned to a string of seemingly random killings of women. Each one has no connection to the other and the all look a whole lot like Elizabeth Baur.

The suspects range from former combat photographer Joe Don Baker to a disturbed young man Elliott Street who has gotten into shooting slices of life with his hand held 8 millimeter camera. Of course Elizabeth Baur is in harm's way continually.

In the end I really didn't understand what it was all about. They were losing their creative juices with this one.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed