"Law & Order" Thinking Makes It So (TV Episode 2006) Poster

(TV Series)

(2006)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Persuasive force
TheLittleSongbird18 August 2022
Will admit to not being crazy about "Thinking Makes it So" on first watch. Just didn't buy how Fontana got away with his actions so easily and Borgia's (actually liked her character and much preferred her over Southerlyn, who did nothing for me) attitude also turned me off. There are episodes of the franchise though that didn't impress me on first watch but fared much better on rewatch and turned out to be good and more.

"Thinking Makes it So" is one of those episodes. While not quite a 'Law and Order' high point, to me it is one of the most memorable and best episodes of Season 16 and Fontana's behaviour and why the other characters don't challenge it as much (though it's hardly ignored) are much more understandable. It is also the episode that improved the most on rewatch. My thoughts on Borgia in "Thinking Makes it So" remains the same having said that.

Borgia's character writing is the one thing that didn't work for me in "Thinking Makes it So". Actually liked her (at least she had some personality and was professional, unlike Southerlyn) and always did feel that she didn't get enough of a chance to completely shine or develop, but here she comes over as very opinionated and stubborn in a way that she was not before. She always did have strong views expressed strongly, but not like this.

Everything else isn't a problem. That is including Fontana's actions and the attitude towards it. The reactions were extreme, but it was spur on the moment anger when seeing how dangerous the perpetrator really was. What he does is nothing compared to the level of unprofessionalism seen in latter seasons 'Special Victims Unit' (which included confidentiality breaching, beating up suspects in prison and male bias).

Coming onto individual elements, the production values are solid and the intimacy of the photography doesn't get static or too filmed play-like. The music when used is not too over-emphatic and has a melancholic edge that is quite haunting. The direction is sympathetic enough without being leaden. The script is tight and thoughtful, raising some interesting questions in the legal portions, and the policing and legal scenes are equally good. The arrest in partiicular has a good deal of tension with the policing.

Performances are all strong and the perpetrator is one of the season's most despicable and creepily played.

In summary, great and so much better than remembered. 9/10.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Most persuasive
bkoganbing21 December 2015
Peter Jacobson returns for his final appearance as defense attorney Randolph Dworkin whose clownish borscht belt shtick in court belies a razor sharp mind. I do so hope SVU brings him back on one of their episodes.

He's got a real sleazy client this time, a con artist in Stephen Schnetzler. Con artists aren't lovable tricksters going after the very rich. This guy and his son have a deadly scheme.

They probably had Michael Countryman's movements down real good. Schnetzler during a small window of opportunity when Countryman's little girl is alone. She's snatched and Schnetzler's son contacts the victim and asks him to assist in a bank robbery for ransom. The FBI says there were two other such incidents where the kids were found dead and the other never found though there's no link to anyone.

When Dennis Farina and Jesse Martin figure it out it's Farina who goes out to the Hamptons where Schnetzler has a pair of ex-wives he bilked. He has to be most persuasive in getting the whereabouts of the child out of Schnetzler.

It's the technicalities that Jacobson pins his hopes on getting the case dismissed. Truth be told Farina crossed the line in a good cause. They have quite a battle of wits on the stand. And Sam Waterston as well is evenly matched with Jacobson and he knows it.

If there was ever an episode that justified a little torture this was it.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I think that the constitution should be used less as a shield for the guilty and more as a sword for their innocent victims
Mrpalli7713 January 2018
A man, bank employee, left a bag full of money to a guy who had just got into the bank. After another employee shouting some money went missing, a gunfight occurred and the guy was shot dead. What's the reason in doing that? His only daughter was kidnapped by the killed robber. He was a waiter at a French restaurant who came from a rich family (his father made a lot of money from mergers and acquisitions, a con man well dressed). After having enough proofs against his father, Fontana used unconventional methods (like trying to drown him in the wc) to let him talk. The case was closed and the little girl found safe and sound in a boat. The point is the way Fontana behaved: an abuse of power by a police officer.

A real problem for the lawyers: should a violence be used for the greater good? I don't think so. There are laws to follow. Mainly if McCoy has to deal with the freak defense attorney Randy Dworkin (Peter Jacobson), a regularly character in Law & Order series.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Episode
hiltonsmithjr15 May 2020
Fontana is a HERO. The Creep kidnapped an 8yr old girl. Borgia can Kiss My Conservative Backside!! A LITTLE, INNOCENT, Girl!!! Fontana Got The Job DONE!!! Period.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed