"Law & Order" Mammon (TV Episode 2023) Poster

(TV Series)

(2023)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A solid episode, close to the original
bpete3333 February 2023
Is this episode perfect? No. Are the writers still struggling to find the spark the show had in it original run? Absolutely. But this episode had a lot of good/interesting things in it. There was good tension between the two cop partners, who I really like. I'm not a fan of the lawyer played by Hugh Dancy. I find him incredibly dull and stiff and like it better when they focus on the female ADA, which they don't here. Everytime the focus is on him it's a snoozefest. That's my only issue.

At this point I don't know why people insist on trashing this new incarnation of the original Law & Order. Either you except it's flaws and roll with it or watch something else.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mammon
bobcobb3016 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This episode gave us some good twists and turns and some unexpected elements, and also some intriguing legal and moral questions about whether men in cloth (or clergymen as Jack McCoy weirdly pronounced it multiple times) should be compelled to testify.

But the story itself had some holes and flaws within it. I feel like this would have been good to tie in to the Law and Order: Organized Crime premise they recently had.

A step in the right direction though. I know some people will just criticize and never accept this reboot but I feel like they are doing as good as you can expect given the limitations around broadcast TV these days.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent writing
pflans-9887015 February 2023
This is excellent writing on the very touchy issue of the Gospel of prosperity and its impact to those who could be caught up in it.. The Gospel of Prosperity is nothing but evil exploitation of faithful congregants as they donate their money and emotions to a church in the belief that any positive change in their lives can be ascribed to the church. This episode dealt squarely with the many sides of this issue. I can only hope that it struck a cord with watchers who may be caught up in this religious reign of terror. The clergy benefits of the believers donations includes aircraft, expensive and exotic cars, scandalously expensive housing, and on and on. All of these things are given without taxation to the pastors and the churches. This episode details just how far this merciless and evil religious theory can possibly go.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Still a Cheap Knock Off of the Original Show
bkkaz3 February 2023
Could the new Law and Order finally be stumbling - like a drunk wearing a blindfold in an unlit alley during a solar eclipse -- closer to the greatness of the original series? Eh.

This episode is better than some in the reboot, but that's like saying being run over by a motorcycle is better than being run over by a taxi cab. The beats are sorta like those at the end of the classic era, so there's that. This one has some banter among characters rather than the plodding, paint-by-numbers dialogue of so many others.

In this episode, Derp and Lurch continue to show why people - especially Black people - are afraid of the police. In some ways, this is closer to the original series, though neither one seems to have the finesse of those cops. Instead, they intimidate and strong arm anyone they come in contact with to get what they want. In one moment, a suspect who is not under arrest and told them he doesn't want to talk to them nonetheless is bullied to the point he finally pushes Derp away.

And, of course, that's what Derp and Lurch want, since now he's technically assaulted a police officer. But he didn't have to talk to them in the first place. Not being under arrest and having informed them in straightforward terms he had nothing else to say, they're obligated to leave and not just escalate. But escalate they do.

This is more realistic, and on some level, I applaud the show for staggering if only marginally closer to being a procedural based in reality again. The problem is this version of Law and Order never wants to go all in. It wants to remain like its mind-numbing cousin, SVU, in some strange fictional realm where all the main characters are always right, despite their performative angst and constant bending of the rules while pontificating that they're always in the moral right.

The Garden Gnome continued to overact - he reminds me of the scene chewing and therefore intensely annoying Raphael Barba on SVU - and I think the show would grow by leaps and bounds if they got rid of him and promoted AOC to his position. So far, she's the best thing about the Law and Order reboot, even if they keep having to do that irritating thing SVU does, which is getting lots of disapproving reaction shots from her because, you know, the audience wouldn't understand by context what they must be feeling. I honestly think she's a far better actress than the reboot deserves, and if the writers and directors could stop thinking they're making General Hospital episodes, she could shine.

The Law and Order franchise now has all the subtlety of Olivia Benson trying to find the chemistry with her son, which is to say none. It's also getting tired. The last few episodes have explained elementary legal concepts - you know, like a confession being privileged - as though the audience has never seen such things before. As a result, the actual mystery and ensuring trial here seem more like an eight grade lesson in the justice system than the taut procedural that it could have been.

Those who are fans of hackneyed acting will be pleased to see the automatons playing judges and defense attorneys continue to be wooden and amateurish. Remember when Law and Order seemed so realistic it was hard to accept they were acting? Not anymore. NOT ANYMORE, PAL. Do they roll up to a Home Depot each morning and ask if anyone hanging around wants to play a judge? Was the budget cut, too? Courtroom scenes routinely empty of extras, for example - where does that money go?

That's a more interesting mystery than what is in the actual episode.
2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Magic Mike
safenoe21 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Lyriq Bent plays Pastor Mike Butler in Mammon, which takes a look at a prosperity church and the Pastor who takes liberties with more than one of the Ten Commandments. No Christian is perfect, but somehow this episode kind of lacked the nuance that perhaps the original version of Law and Order could have tackled with more sensitivity.

Joy Lane directed this episode Mammon. It just happens a 2005 episode of Law and Order was called Mammon, directed by the son of Jane Alexander.

Anyway, I'm hoping that maybe Chris Noth or S. Epatha Merkerson can make cameo appearances in future episodes to help out.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed