Blairzo-2 Reviews

Munich (2005)

a drab somewhat slow moving account

[5/10 · 28 December 2005]

...of what I'm sure is a good adaptation of events that occurred specifically after this horrific event. So in that sense, I'm sure our famous director deserves praise for his efforts in bringing "Munich" all together in realistic fashion and with no "embroidery" to it's content. I just found there was not enough dramatics, suspense or excitement in the aftermath plan, to hold me in my seat with anticipation of things to come. The men involved certainly wern't technical marvels nor did they appear overly confident in following through their mission..all which lost the spark for me in recreating the events. I guess one goes in to these pictures thinking the way Hollywood makes spy and intrigue movies with all it's special effects, huge dramatic action sequences twists and turns etc. etc. You won't find a lot of this in Munich...nor probably should you. It's an interpretation of events that took place after wards..and I'm sure this is realistically how it was. Just don't go in to the movie expecting a "Black Hawk Down" or "Mission Impossible III". You'll be quite disappointed. If it moved a bit quicker and, was 30 - 40 minutes shorter, I'd of given it a higher score than 5.

Closer (I) (2004)

negative and disturbing

[3/10 · 29 December 2004]

if you're into movies that concentrate on the intricacies of infidelity, guilt manipulation, human fealty, disrespect for and lack of commitment in a marriage...then this film is for you. I found the whole theme very negative and disturbing, promoting infidelity and lack of respect and commitment in marriages..just what we need to view more of in our current era and generation of high divorce rates and adultery. Just about everyone reaction around me was negative upon the movies conclusion..one woman commenting that the only good thing about the whole film was the soundtrack. The acting overall was pretty good and as bizarre as the story plot was...each of the four were very believable in how they would describe their emotions. However, if I had known ahead of time that the entire content of this story revolved around cheating and guilt manipulation...I would have passed. You certainly won't leave the theatre uplifted. many I'm sure, leave filling a lot of guilt of their own..which maybe was the intent of it all.

School of Rock (2003)

Jack Black Rocks!!!!

[9/10 · 19 October 2003]

just great entertainment!! If you're from that era when good hard rock was king (70's early 80's)...you'll love the reminising!! Not to mention the "passion" that Jack Black puts into this role! He's a rock and roll maniac! Reminds me of a part I could imagine Jim Carry in...Black is that good and that wild and crazy! A definite 9 out of 10...for shear fun, laughs and entertainment

Narc (2002)

powerful but......

[5/10 · 29 July 2003]

slow moving and rather boring story...which has been done a ton of times before. However...if you like powerful acting it's worth a see. I gave it a 5 rating...but I'm critical and it's probably worth a bit more.

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)

A Total Blast!!

[9/10 · 5 July 2003]

This film will blow you away; the sound, the effects...total action plus a bit of comic relief here and there, make for a fabulous sci-fi movie experience..even if you haven't seen Terminator 1 or 2. Highly recommended..kids and adults alike (or those that can get into this sort of thing). I rate it a 9 out of 10

The Truth About Charlie (2002)

The truth is.....this movie SUCKS!!!

[1/10 · 22 April 2003]

Absolutely awful..can't even remotely be compared to the original movie "Charade"` which had poise, class, and most importantly..DECENT ACTING! Don't waste your time with this mess! I gave up on it after 60 minutes.

Blood Work (2002)

wake me when it's over.........(yawn)

[5/10 · 28 December 2002]

this movie just plodded along. A snooze fest. Very slow and boring plot which never truly took off for me. I was quite disappointed overall and yet I'm a great Clint Eastwood fan. Glad I didn't waste the full price at the theatre on this one however..it's "passes" as an average time waster video rental. I'm generous in giving it a vote of 5 really.

Murder by Numbers (2002)

Murder by "Boredom"

[5/10 · 6 October 2002]

slowest moving film I've seen in a long time. Include this with the fact it's basically boring (especially Sandra Bullock) throughout, and you've got a film that starts out with lot's of potential, but drags along with plot holes that are so evident...it's a "crime" in itself. The two boys in the film do a great job though..and make up for Sandra Bullock's obviously "over the top" acting as the "tough guy" female detective. If it wasn't for the two adolesent plotters...this movie wouldn't of even attained the 5 rating I gave it.

Panic Room (2002)

Mostly disappointing

[6/10 · 22 September 2002]

the script is just awful and with the exception of Whittiker, the other two bad guys terribly overact!! This is a video rental and time waster at best. I'm glad I just rented it now, and didn't spend the $10.00 at the theatre. Had its moments of suspence but overall..things didn't get much better until Foster was "out" of the room.

John Q (2002)

barely half decent as a "time waster"

[3/10 · 26 July 2002]

a great collection of fine actors is wasted in this mostly contrived effort, about a Dad going to the next level in securing the help of a hospital to save his son. The script is totally awful too. Disappointing overall, except Denzel pulls off his usual fine effort. It's amazing, so many high profile actors were all hired on simutanelously for this film when other than Denzel, their characters were so poorly developed and scripted..it's almost an insult to their abilities. Don't believe me??.....rent it and see

Spy Game (2001)

wake me up when it's over

[3/10 · 23 June 2002]

a snooze fest, as far as I'm concerned. Barely worth the price of the rental...but I was so glad I didn't pay at the theatre! Redford fans will admire his performance..even though all the clips back in time to Vietnam et al....never looks like either he nor Brad Pitt ever age much! That could have been done alot better.

The Last Castle (2001)

excessive patriotism is sickening!

[5/10 · 8 March 2002]

need one say more? You've got to be an over zealous American to take all this in. Reading most of the other comments seems to mirror these sentiments. If just once, American's wouldn't come off so smuggly as more patriotic than anyone one else on the planet..I'm sure more of the world would give this picture a fairer shake.

Ali (2001)

good, but not great

[6/10 · 28 December 2001]

first off....too long. Period. 40 minutes should be taken off to bring it in at an even 2 hours. As pragmatic a person (and star) as Ali was...the ongoing saga of his life between the years 1964 to 1974..often left me bored, waiting for and wanting some adrenalin to set in. It just couldn't hold my interest throughout...which is why I thought it would be more entertaining if it was 2 hours long and not 2 hr. 40 minutes. That being said..I thought Will Smith did a good job in the role, although at times I found it hard to imagine him on screen, as the character he was portraying.

Attraction (2000)

just when you think it's safe to take a chance on a rental!

[1/10 · 5 August 2001]

an absolute piece of "drivel"...and BORRRINGGG!...yikes! No wonder this film went straight to video. Somebody must of suspected something. Total waste of time and money (even with video's being cheaper) A "1" vote is being generous here. Believe me...take a chance on something else and leave this mess at the video store,

Get Carter (2000)

Get (Lost) Carter

[4/10 · 17 February 2001]

abysmal, boring, lousy...take your choice of adjectives. Thank heavens...I wasted only $4.00 on the video, instead of double that at the theatre! I wouldn't even put this one on a list of choices when you're bored and don't know what to choose at the video store! Bad script, bad acting....Stallone at his "cheesiest" best, just all add up to a real stinker. I gave it a 3 out of 10...which really, is too generous.

Any Given Sunday (1999)

On any given Sunday....there's got to be film better than this!

[6/10 · 8 October 2000]

I found the whole premise of this movie to be somewhat predictable and contrived, from the get-go. I also did not find Pacino looking very comfortable in this role as a head coach. Although (as he always does), he demonstrates his usual "intensity" into the part..it just wasn't convincing for me. Cameron Diaz as the owner??...come on! Overall...I gave this movie a 6, which in hindsight is overly generous.

Where Eagles Dare (1968)

"Unrealistc"

[6/10 · 18 March 2000]

Frankly....other than the fabulous on location shooting of this film, I found the whole thing to be overly long and slow moving and with somewhat of a weak script (considering the acting talent of those involved). Most of all though for a war/espionage type movie it just didn't come across as very convincing or realistic to me. It all looked too easy or staged. I'd rate this a 6...at the VERY most

The Sixth Sense (1999)

good...but not great

[8 August 1999]

Overall, I found this film to be slow moving throughout. However, the plot is intriging and the film has a most definite "errie" feeling and this was telegraphed well to the audience. Perhaps my expectations were higher than the delivered product. That being said though, the ending is a good one; quite surprising and thought provoking, which saved my vote from being any lower. I gave this movie 7 votes.

The Thin Red Line (1998)

"Saving Private Ryan" it isn't!

[6/10 · 15 January 1999]

Great scenery and some decent battle scenes (albeit, somewhat long and drawn out ones)...I gave this film a "6" I found the movie overall, too long and draggy, with so many useless cameo appearances by some decent actors...why even bother! I mean, one scene for George Clooney in a nearly 3 hour film?? It simply can't compare to Saving Private Ryan in any department...too bad, I had hoped for so much more but instead...found myself on 2 or 3 occasions nearly falling asleep!

Ronin (1998)

a 6 out of 10

[6/10 · 2 October 1998]

I thought this movie had a lot of potential, especially through the first hour. Some great action sequences and excellent "on location" filming and photography. The plot however I found to be somewhat muddled and meadering throughout, especially through the second half of the picture. If I hadn't read a thorough "promo" of the film prior to viewing, I doubt I could have made alot of sense of exactly what was transpiring.