I always have to be careful evaluating silents. I don't want to fall into the trap of overrating something because it's "good for its time" but I also don't want to overcompensate for that just to prove a point. I just try to be honest, and really I didn't think this was very good at all, no matter what time it's from. This is my first experience with this story, and although I loathe Andrew Lloyd Webber, I have to imagine that even his version is more nuanced than this. Barebones storytelling with zero intriguing developments and drearily dull characters. I couldn't give a damn what happened to Christine (whose reaction to the phantom is no more sophisticated than "eww gross") or her generic lover. Even Lon Chaney is just a boring bogeyman with a cool makeup job. There are a few striking images and a handful of funhouse tricks at the climax, but nothing terribly exciting. Yawn.
Review of The Phantom of the Opera
